You mean ESPN would promote an obscure position player over a quarterback who threw for more yards than the previous years heismen winner merely for attention and ratings? Say it isn’t so?
Woodson did have an excellent season ... for a CB. 7 INTs, 246 yards and 3 TDs from scrimmage, 1 ST TD. And the ST TD was the "Heisman moment" that helped Michigan beat OSU which was then and still is the most storied rivalry... especially since UT/Bama have rarely clashed while both at the peak of their success.
Do I think that the national media collaborated to push Woodson to #1 in voting to spite Tennessee? I do, especially given Fowler's comments.
Do I think Woodson deserved it over Manning? Not really.
Did Woodson have an outstanding year not only at CB but an all-around player? Yes.
Was Woodson a major reason his team was undefeated? Yes.
Michigan also had a significantly better 1997 than we did. They beat (at the time) #8 Colorado, 15 Iowa, 15 Mich State, 2 Penn State, 23 Wisconsin, 4 Ohio State. Woodson definitely played a key role in those wins. We lost to #1 Florida (by 13), beat 15 Georgia, 25 Southern Miss and 11 Auburn.
So overall was it just a bad year to go up against a media darling? Yes.
And both guys went on to be HOF players. Woodson is FAR from an "obscure position player".