Recent content by BeardedVol

JFC...counterattacking on the territory of the country that invaded you, is not an aggressive invasion of that nation, when they are still actively conducting an invasion of your country. Again, North Korea invaded the South, it doesn't even really matter when China became involved, they were...

Seriously, where are you getting this nonsense? France was in overall command of allied forces at the time of Germany's invasion of Belgium in 1940. It was the French general Gamelin, who committed the bulk of allied forces to Belgium north of the Ardennes, because he erroneously believed that...

I'm not surprised at their ridiculous takes. Unfortunately for them, an embargo, is not an act of war under international law, so their entire premise is as ridiculous as their justification of Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

The treaty was already signed, Germany attacked Poland before it was ratified. You are literally the only person I've ever talked to that believes France was an 'aggressor' in World War 2.

Aiding a country that is actively being invaded, is not "attacking without provocation" in any sense of the word or concept of what "warmongering" entails. By your bizarre definition, NATO article 5 would make every country not directly attacked, an "aggressive warmonger" for aiding the member...

The Kasprzycki–Gamelin Convention, signed in May of 1939, and ratified 4 days after Germany invaded Poland.

It's not. The literal definition of 'warmongering', is supporting "aggression". Ukraine the victim of Russian aggression, cannot be expected to not defend itself from Russia's aggression, nor can any country that aids them in expelling the Russian invaders be considered 'warmongers', since...

Supporting Ukraine in defense of their nation by an invader is not "warmongering", not even by the broadest and loosest definition.

No.

An ironic statement coming from a person who was taken in by Patrick Lancaster's staged "reports".

Why again is it that we should care about what the DPRK put out in press releases?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1993/06/03/ukraine-could-seize-control-over-nuclear-arms/52d7e14b-a2b1-4973-b26b-abd6533ba2ca/

Your ignorance is palpable. https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/Ukraine-Nuclear-Weapons

"Tactical nuke" is a misnomer. Any use of nuclear weapons in Europe, low-yield or otherwise, by Russia would trigger a nuclear response from the UK, France, and the United States.

This is definitely in the top 3 posts that highlight your abject ignorance of both history, and warfare as it pertains to the United States.