It goes to record between the 4 teams which look like this in this scenario:
UT: 3-2
Vandy: 3-2
UF: 2-3
Bama: 1-2
That puts florida 4 and bama 5,
UT then goes to tiebreak with vandy, split season series. Next tiebreak is record against top 4 seeds:
UT:3 wins (Fla twice, Vandy)
Vandy:2 wins (Fla, UT)
UT would receive the 2 seed and Vandy the 3.
this would put 4 SEC east teams ahead of every west team... i like this new format. West was complaining and now they don't even get a single bye... beggars can't be choosers i guess.
I don't think that's the proper tie break. It's record among tie teams, then If you get to head to head it's head to head. Then record vs #1 team, then if still tied you go to #2 team record and do forth until the tie is broken or you get to team #12. Then commissioner flips a coin.It goes to record between the 4 teams which look like this in this scenario:
UT: 3-2
Vandy: 3-2
UF: 2-3
Bama: 1-2
That puts florida 4 and bama 5,
UT then goes to tiebreak with vandy, split season series. Next tiebreak is record against top 4 seeds:
UT:3 wins (Fla twice, Vandy)
Vandy:2 wins (Fla, UT)
UT would receive the 2 seed and Vandy the 3.
I'm not seeing why we'd be above Vandy based on that. We'd have the 2 wins over UF, but they'd have 1 win over UF and a win over Bama. I would think we'd still be tied, and the tiebreaker would move on to whoever finishes below all of the 10-6 teams. Of course, they should place Bama below the other 10-6s based on strength of schedule (played all of the former West teams twice).
That said, I'd rather UF win a game this week and finish 2nd, because I'd rather be 3rd and play UF in the semis, while UK plays Vandy. That sounds better than being 2nd and playing Vandy in the semis.
If all 4 are 10-6. Then based on record among tied teams UT and Vandy tied 3-2, Florida 2-3, then Bama 1-2. To break UT Vandy tie, you would go head to head then compare their records to #1 team and on down till you break the tie. H2H- 1-1, vs UK both 0-2, vs Florida UT 2-0, Vandy 1-1. So UT 2nd seed, Vandy 3
This is the correct process.
First things first win Wednesday.
Also, vandy/Florida play tonight, if Florida does win then there's no chance of a 4 way tie so keep tabs on it. If its a 3 way tie with tenn vandy and bama vandy goes 3, we go 4. Iirc
A bama loss is still the best option IMO.
This is the correct process.
First things first win Wednesday.
Also, vandy/Florida play tonight, if Florida does win then there's no chance of a 4 way tie so keep tabs on it. If its a 3 way tie with tenn vandy and bama vandy goes 3, we go 4. Iirc
A bama loss is still the best option IMO.
i really think all of this will be null and void after wed. night. i just don't think we will be l s u. we played awful on the road against s c and came away with a win, but they are a terrible team and l s u is not that bad. it is hard to win down there. i hope i'm wrong and we pull it out, because i think we will beat vandy on sat.
I'm not seeing why we'd be above Vandy based on that. We'd have the 2 wins over UF, but they'd have 1 win over UF and a win over Bama. I would think we'd still be tied, and the tiebreaker would move on to whoever finishes below all of the 10-6 teams. Of course, they should place Bama below the other 10-6s based on strength of schedule (played all of the former West teams twice).
That said, I'd rather UF win a game this week and finish 2nd, because I'd rather be 3rd and play UF in the semis, while UK plays Vandy. That sounds better than being 2nd and playing Vandy in the semis.