Volman365's Takeaways From Game

#1

Volman365

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2018
Messages
555
Likes
388
#1
1. Ty Chandler is a Heisman ability back but our staff is enamored with "spreading" the ball around to other backs throughout the game. It is very frustrating as he can and will be a stud in the league. Think Kamara on steroids.
2. 79 plays in a modern football game is not much for a defense to play. Its not ideal but definitely not a ridiculous number and not an excuse to give up 50.
3. From a pure physiological standpoint, KC is much better equipped to take the beating that our Oline allows our QBs to take.
4. We can and will beat Vandy if Ty is featured almost exclusively, the others are simply mop up type players.
5. There is NO way Missiouri has a night and day better roster of talent with the last 4 or 5 classes they have brought in, simply NO WAY.
6. We will win 10 next year if we play Shrout and feature Chandler.
 
#2
#2
1. Ty Chandler is a Heisman ability back but our staff is enamored with "spreading" the ball around to other backs throughout the game. It is very frustrating as he can and will be a stud in the league. Think Kamara on steroids.
2. 79 plays in a modern football game is not much for a defense to play. Its not ideal but definitely not a ridiculous number and not an excuse to give up 50.
3. From a pure physiological standpoint, KC is much better equipped to take the beating that our Oline allows our QBs to take.
4. We can and will beat Vandy of Ty is featured almost exclusively, the others are simply mop up type players.
5. There is NO way Missiouri has a night and day better roster of talent with the last 4 or 5 classes they have brought in, simply NO WAY.
6. We will win 10 next year if we play Shrout and feature Chandler.

You lost me on “think Kamara on Steroids” in regards to Chandler.... lol

If you think Ty Chandler is anywhere near the back that Alvin Kamara was and is, there is simply something wrong with you.
 
#3
#3
You lost me on “think Kamara on Steroids” in regards to Chandler.... lol

If you think Ty Chandler is anywhere near the back that Alvin Kamara was and is, there is simply something wrong with you.
You know this because outside of the Texas A&M game, Alvin put up ridiculously good numbers right??? 🙄
 
  • Like
Reactions: swampfoxfan
#5
#5
Technically... the defense gave up 36. Not that that should make anything better.

And what does it mean to be physiologically better able to take a beating?
 
#6
#6
1. Ty Chandler is a Heisman ability back but our staff is enamored with "spreading" the ball around to other backs throughout the game. It is very frustrating as he can and will be a stud in the league. Think Kamara on steroids.
2. 79 plays in a modern football game is not much for a defense to play. Its not ideal but definitely not a ridiculous number and not an excuse to give up 50.
3. From a pure physiological standpoint, KC is much better equipped to take the beating that our Oline allows our QBs to take.
4. We can and will beat Vandy if Ty is featured almost exclusively, the others are simply mop up type players.
5. There is NO way Missiouri has a night and day better roster of talent with the last 4 or 5 classes they have brought in, simply NO WAY.
6. We will win 10 next year if we play Shrout and feature Chandler.
#6 just destroyed any credibility you may have had.....
 
#9
#9
Technically... the defense gave up 36. Not that that should make anything better.

And what does it mean to be physiologically better able to take a beating?

He is much more physical in natural stature. JG is tough, but he has narrow shoulders and hips, he will always get injured.
 
#10
#10
He is much more physical in natural stature. JG is tough, but he has narrow shoulders and hips, he will always get injured.
Chryst is a bigger guy, but I don't think we want to test out that knee of his.
 
#17
#17
ler Chryst take beatings all year before you declare him physiologically more able to take a beating.
 
#20
#20
1. Ty Chandler is a Heisman ability back but our staff is enamored with "spreading" the ball around to other backs throughout the game. It is very frustrating as he can and will be a stud in the league. Think Kamara on steroids.
2. 79 plays in a modern football game is not much for a defense to play. Its not ideal but definitely not a ridiculous number and not an excuse to give up 50.
3. From a pure physiological standpoint, KC is much better equipped to take the beating that our Oline allows our QBs to take.
4. We can and will beat Vandy if Ty is featured almost exclusively, the others are simply mop up type players.
5. There is NO way Missiouri has a night and day better roster of talent with the last 4 or 5 classes they have brought in, simply NO WAY.
6. We will win 10 next year if we play Shrout and feature Chandler.

WHERE did you sit?
 
  • Like
Reactions: WhitewaterVol
#21
#21
They are several problem areas on the team. All of them however pale to the pathetic play of the OL. QB play has not been a major problem on the team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: alaVOL
#22
#22
1. Ty Chandler is a Heisman ability back but our staff is enamored with "spreading" the ball around to other backs throughout the game. It is very frustrating as he can and will be a stud in the league. Think Kamara on steroids.
2. 79 plays in a modern football game is not much for a defense to play. Its not ideal but definitely not a ridiculous number and not an excuse to give up 50.
3. From a pure physiological standpoint, KC is much better equipped to take the beating that our Oline allows our QBs to take.
4. We can and will beat Vandy if Ty is featured almost exclusively, the others are simply mop up type players.
5. There is NO way Missiouri has a night and day better roster of talent with the last 4 or 5 classes they have brought in, simply NO WAY.
6. We will win 10 next year if we play Shrout and feature Chandler.
Leave the post-game take aways for DG. This was terrible.
 

VN Store



Back
Top