SaintLouieVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2007
- Messages
- 271
- Likes
- 485
Many are commenting on this statement made by our new AD in the press conference and most are asserting either: 1) This proves he was the wrong man for the AD job and we overpaid for him, or 2) No way this is true and he is lying to us. I do not believe either of these is the actual case. I take his statement to mean that Josh Heupel is the only person we placed a legal, written, formal job offer contract in front of for their signature of acceptance. This would not be at all unusual for an executive level job search and the HC position at UT is definitely an executive level job, regardless of what anyone thinks of the last few individuals who held the position. He never said that there were not other coaches higher on the “hit list” than CJH. He cannot say that because you don’t want to start the new coach off by telling the world “we settled” even if some believe that to be the case. Everyone including the new coach can surmise that Fleck, Elliot, Campbell, etal. were higher on the list, were fully vetted but were not “formally” handed a contract to sign. Reason being, formal contracts for executive positions only come into play when verbal terms have been reached and there is a 99+ % belief that the contract will be signed, NOT rejected. This is how the “game” is played. You may not like the “game” but this is the world we live in. This DOES mean that within the boundaries that AD White had to operate he could not craft an offer that was “good enough” to convince any of the individuals at the top of the “hit list” to sign. That is more a statement on the current state of UT football than an indictment of the AD’s abilities. And, yes, I am sure he was working within a set of boundaries as to what he could offer/promise. Everyone has a boss, and there is no such thing as a blank check. Some on this site don’t want to accept the reality of this but sometimes reality bites!