a vol n tears
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2012
- Messages
- 1,532
- Likes
- 1,715
After watching how the NIL football has evolved and what appears to be the most successful teams. I am seeing a progression towards small market colleges and large market colleges. The bigger populated schools are beginning to show their financial ability to raise money vs the mid and lower schools. A Texas, aTm, tOSU, Mich, PSU, as examples. The other is an Oregon which has Knight and greatly wants them to succeed in football. Then you have mid tier. Ala, Aub, Tenn, LSU, Miss, Miami, FSU as examples. The Smaller schools invest in basketball or baseball. Such as U Conn, Duke, Kansas, Ky and such. They can’t have enough alumni / fans to support the bigger sports. This appears to be the future and they will expand the playoffs to make the mid tier appear to have a chance. The money schools make from TV have nothing to do with building competative teams if the money is split equally and it goes back to how much more can they raise.
As a side note, I as a Tenn fan, am more than happy spending money to keep the baseball and basketball in the top 5-10 every year, and football has 7-9 wins each year. I know football is the supposed money maker but apparently the Kentuckys, Kansas’ U Conn etc are doing enough to have their teams competing for NCs each year.
Now my question. Why is it still important for a college football team to have 85 players. The NFL has about 43 or 45 on the active roster.
As a side note, I as a Tenn fan, am more than happy spending money to keep the baseball and basketball in the top 5-10 every year, and football has 7-9 wins each year. I know football is the supposed money maker but apparently the Kentuckys, Kansas’ U Conn etc are doing enough to have their teams competing for NCs each year.
Now my question. Why is it still important for a college football team to have 85 players. The NFL has about 43 or 45 on the active roster.