SNAFU
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2011
- Messages
- 686
- Likes
- 2,406
I have seen him go as late middle second and Sampson in the 6th#15 to the Falcons
”The only concern about Pearce is whether his size (243 pounds) is enough for teams to see him as a true three-down option. If they do, don’t be surprised to see Pearce land closer to the top 10. His ability to win with speed off the edge is nearly unmatched in this class.”
11 to 49ers. They love Vol players#15 to the Falcons
”The only concern about Pearce is whether his size (243 pounds) is enough for teams to see him as a true three-down option. If they do, don’t be surprised to see Pearce land closer to the top 10. His ability to win with speed off the edge is nearly unmatched in this class.”
#15 to the Falcons
”The only concern about Pearce is whether his size (243 pounds) is enough for teams to see him as a true three-down option. If they do, don’t be surprised to see Pearce land closer to the top 10. His ability to win with speed off the edge is nearly unmatched in this class.”
Everyone, in the NFL, has speed. It's a requirement, hence all the emphasis put on their 40 times at the combines.#15 to the Falcons
”The only concern about Pearce is whether his size (243 pounds) is enough for teams to see him as a true three-down option. If they do, don’t be surprised to see Pearce land closer to the top 10. His ability to win with speed off the edge is nearly unmatched in this class.”
Just has more to do with the position he plays in today's NFL game. The days are over where there is a run on top running backs early in the 1st round. I don't get it, but this is the trend and I don't agree with this either. I think you always take the best football player available when picking, unless of course, it is a need that you absolutely don't need.Ok, then. Why is he not projected higher?
Imagine how good he'd be if he wasn't held on nearly every play? All NFL teams need to do is watch the video of him being held. That tells them everything they need to know. A lot of times coaches will tell them to hold and take the gamble on not getting the flag vs getting QB sacked or fumbled and if you play for Alabama you will basically never have holding called on you, so why not do it?
I think we have over valued Sampson just because he’s ours if we’re being honest. He isn’t a “once in a lifetime, generational type back”. Sure he was great for us but he didn’t do anything outlandish. Each NFL team probably already has 1-2 backs on the squad as talented or nearly as talented. Add in that the position isn’t as valued as it once was and he falls to late rounds. He will likely fall to a team and be used along with another 1-2 backs per game. Like most teams are now doing.Just has more to do with the position he plays in today's NFL game. The days are over where there is a run on top running backs early in the 1st round. I don't get it, but this is the trend and I don't agree with this either. I think you always take the best football player available when picking, unless of course, it is a need that you absolutely don't need.
Sampson is a huge prospect and will be able to do a lot in the league. I think he's a franchise type of back. I guess the overall view on running backs is they don't want to give these huge guaranteed contracts to a position that takes so much physical wear and tear?
Better. I didn't seem like Pearce Jr. made a lot of plays but if you watch his highlights it's easy to see that he was the MVP of the Alabama game and did a lot to keep us in the game against Arkansas. I'm afraid we are going to miss him a lot more than we'd all like to imagine.Better or worse than a Darrel “WGWTFA” Taylor?