1942 SEC Championship: why wasn’t it Tennessee?

#1

NighthawkVol

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2007
Messages
13,346
Likes
47,276
#1
I asked this question last year. Got no answer. I’ll try again.

In the 1941-42 season, Tennessee had the best record in the SEC. Yet, Kentucky was named the SEC champion (with the 3rd best record after Alabama). Kentucky then won the SEC Tournament, to win both the regular season championship and the tournament championship.

Why was Kentucky named the regular season champion with the 3rd best record? Here’s a link to the standings.

 
  • Like
Reactions: adam.vol
#2
#2
I asked this question last year. Got no answer. I’ll try again.

In the 1941-42 season, Tennessee had the best record in the SEC. Yet, Kentucky was named the SEC champion (with the 3rd best record after Alabama). Kentucky then won the SEC Tournament, to win both the regular season championship and the tournament championship.

Why was Kentucky named the regular season champion with the 3rd best record? Here’s a link to the standings.


This was Tennessee’s schedule. Split with Kentucky, winning by 6 in Knoxville and losing by 3 in Lexington.
 
#6
#6
Good question. Tennessee was 7-1, Kentucky was 6-2, and Alabama was 13-4 in conference play. Why did Alabama play 17 conference games vs 8? Makes no sense.
 

VN Store



Back
Top