wmcovol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2012
- Messages
- 18,579
- Likes
- 33,489
Yep, it's funny when we beat Duke in the tourney Bilas was saying UT was playing football on the hardwood. Duke plays aggressive D and mucks it up this year and all of sudden its brilliant.If you read ESPN it was due to Duke’s defense, not AL’s 3 point ineptitude. Of course if it was TN winning it was due to the other team having an off night.![]()
Certainly Duke was the better team. To be fair though, Oats’ style of play is to drive and/or shoot 3’s. Very little in between. Take those away (as we also did) and it’s a lot harder for Bama. Duke made it hard to do either one and Bama/Oats had no answer. No adjustments available because Bama can’t play any other way. So to me, their style of play played a part in the loss along with Duke’s superior talent.I agree with y'all but at the same time, Duke has the better team.
They didn't lose this game because of Oats or his style of play.
I agree with y'all but at the same time, Duke has the better team.
They didn't lose this game because of Oats or his style of play.
Thank you. As pointed out earlier by another, that was my original point. Oats has only 1 plan & it’s the same every game. Barnes has won the last 4 vs him even though Bama was at least equal, maybe better, in talent. Duke used the same plan Barnes uses, push them off the 3 line & beat them in the 2 pt game.Certainly Duke was the better team. To be fair though, Oats’ style of play is to drive and/or shoot 3’s. Very little in between. Take those away (as we also did) and it’s a lot harder for Bama. Duke made it hard to do either one and Bama/Oats had no answer. No adjustments available because Bama can’t play any other way. So to me, their style of play played a part in the loss along with Duke’s superior talent.
Certainly Duke was the better team. To be fair though, Oats’ style of play is to drive and/or shoot 3’s. Very little in between. Take those away (as we also did) and it’s a lot harder for Bama. Duke made it hard to do either one and Bama/Oats had no answer. No adjustments available because Bama can’t play any other way. So to me, their style of play played a part in the loss along with Duke’s superior talent.
I agree with y'all but at the same time, Duke has the better team.
They didn't lose this game because of Oats or his style of play.
It wasn't a coaching embarrassment. It was a player embarrassment. They got schooled because Duke has better players all over the court. Whatever Oats tried to minimize the talent difference didn't work. Oats' style might need some modifications, but you can't make big time changes to your style this late in the tournament, AND after blowing out BYU. If Bama would have made more shots, it would have been much closer. I guess I could agree that style could lead to an embarrassment against a team that is top ten on D and OIf his team can run & get open shots, especially 3, they’re tough. Get him in a rock fight & he might as well sit on fraternity row.
Duke coach embarassed him tonite.