I mean, in this case "discuss" was just giving some passing disapproval and a "I'll leave it at that".
We're working toward filling up a starting 10, not every transfer get has to be world changing for us. Will we be worse with her than without her? I doubt it. We need perimeter shooting with Tess, Spencer, and Spear gone, after all. Nya will provide that. And will be much more efficient offensively when she focuses on that aspect of her game instead of forcing low-percentage 2s.
If this is our only transfer get, then sure, I get it. But portal season ain't over, and we might still get some impact players. [we should expect it, even] We might even go more than 10 deep — she's had Glenville teams with 12 or even 13 players with more than 10 minutes per game on average. This year I think coach just thought there was a drop-off from players 9 and 10 to players 11 and 12, but if players 11 and 12 hav that dog in em, they play meaningful minutes. [her 2022-23 team was 12-deep of girls playing 10+ minutes; it's possible that she identifies this as a playing role in the year, even! If so, going out and getting depth is much more substantiv in her system than we're used to]
EDIT: Whoops! I got mixed up on what year I was looking at, it wasn't the natty team, it was the team AFTER the natty year that was 12 deep, who made the playoffs but lost in the Final Four to the #1 overall seed and eventual undefeated national champions 37-0 Ashland. The natty year team was almost 11 deep on 10+ minutes: the 11th girl had 9.9 minutes per game.