Savannahbayvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2018
- Messages
- 1,093
- Likes
- 3,109
Any roster move that improves the team is ON TOPIC.Since we’re better off without him, why bring him up like some jealous ex? And at least spell his name right. He’s Polynesian, not Greek.
What you have realized is a fundamental problem of message boards. Their existence cries out for content, but there is not enough content to justify their existence. You read the board anyway because you are part of a “community,” but you get sick of its repetitive nature, particularly when some noob shows up and starts saying something that everyone already knows. Someone always snaps on the person who posts the same topic yet again even though there are no other “on topic” topics to post about. About 99.9% of the time the discussion changes nothing. The other 00.1% of the time, we prevent the hiring of Greg Schiano, which is kind of like the one good shot you hit on the golf course that keeps you coming back. But in the most general sense, about 1 day after any event, there are no new takes left to spew. And yet people will heed the call of the message board, looking to debate ad nuseum whether Nico’s departure will be good or bad because… well… I’ll leave it to you to answer that one.Any roster move that improves the team is ON TOPIC.
Questioning or assigning emotional motives to an OP whose post links to content about improvement to the roster is what's OFF topic.
Y’all really take this whole message board thing serious, huh?What you have realized is a fundamental problem of message boards. Their existence cries out for content, but there is not enough content to justify their existence. You read the board anyway because you are part of a “community,” but you get sick of its repetitive nature, particularly when some noob shows up and starts saying something that everyone already knows. Someone always snaps on the person who posts the same topic yet again even though there are no other “on topic” topics to post about. About 99.9% of the time the discussion changes nothing. The other 00.1% of the time, we prevent the hiring of Greg Schiano, which is kind of like the one good shot you hit on the golf course that keeps you coming back. But in the most general sense, about 1 day after any event, there are no new takes left to spew. And yet people will heed the call of the message board, looking to debate ad nuseum whether Nico’s departure will be good or bad because… well… I’ll leave it to you to answer that one.
In my personal opinion, people MUST fight about “who cares” and other similar pettiness because it is necessary to fill the void and drive engagement, and engagement drives ad revenue, and making money is the point of the site.
Big 10 don’t play defense like the SEC.We are probably better off without him, honestly, but Nico's potential is very high. I suspect UCLA's offense is simpler than Heupel's, and that may enable him to push his passing stats up.
I think we have one less narcissist, or narcissistic family unit, needing all the oxygen in the program. Makes me wonder how that affected receivers executing last season. Nico's accuracy was not elite last season, but both he and Joe had lots of passes dropped. It seemed like more than normal. His completion percentage was padded by WR screens. Milton's were too.
This is pure genius… bingo!What you have realized is a fundamental problem of message boards. Their existence cries out for content, but there is not enough content to justify their existence. You read the board anyway because you are part of a “community,” but you get sick of its repetitive nature, particularly when some noob shows up and starts saying something that everyone already knows. Someone always snaps on the person who posts the same topic yet again even though there are no other “on topic” topics to post about. About 99.9% of the time the discussion changes nothing. The other 00.1% of the time, we prevent the hiring of Greg Schiano, which is kind of like the one good shot you hit on the golf course that keeps you coming back. But in the most general sense, about 1 day after any event, there are no new takes left to spew. And yet people will heed the call of the message board, looking to debate ad nuseum whether Nico’s departure will be good or bad because… well… I’ll leave it to you to answer that one.
In my personal opinion, people MUST fight about “who cares” and other similar pettiness because it is necessary to fill the void and drive engagement, and engagement drives ad revenue, and making money is the point of the site.