Trump Executive Order re: college sports

#1

S.C. OrangeMan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
2,010
Likes
1,962
#1
Signed today. It clearly conflicts with the Sherman Antitrust Act. It specifically claims that the antitrust legalities are "debilitating".

Some pundits already say that this order is essentially toothless.

The only people who are happy about this are those who don't understand that Executive Orders can't override federal law, and especially attorneys.

The article title is obvious hyperbole.

 
#11
#11
Signed today. It clearly conflicts with the Sherman Antitrust Act. It specifically claims that the antitrust legalities are "debilitating".

Some pundits already say that this order is essentially toothless.

The only people who are happy about this are those who don't understand that Executive Orders can't override federal law, and especially attorneys.

The article title is obvious hyperbole.

If it’s toothless why should we care
 
  • Like
Reactions: WillisWG
#14
#14
basically trying to kill NIL. I don't think any way this goes through and we continue on as business usual
The Order prohibits third-party, pay-for-play payments to collegiate athletes. This does not apply to legitimate, fair-market-value compensation that a third party provides to an athlete, such as for a brand endorsement.
 
#20
#20
The Order prohibits third-party, pay-for-play payments to collegiate athletes. This does not apply to legitimate, fair-market-value compensation that a third party provides to an athlete, such as for a brand endorsement.
This is what I thought it stated.

My question now is, how does the University disseminate the monetary value to the next guy that wears #16 and the bookstore sells thousands of jerseys with that number?
 
#21
#21
This is what I thought it stated.

My question now is, how does the University disseminate the monetary value to the next guy that wears #16 and the bookstore sells thousands of jerseys with that number?
generic #s jerseys no NIL, it's the customized jerseys with players name that pay
 
#23
#23
1. In a non-election year, Trump would not waste political capital just for headlines (especially with nothing to gain) nor when he has a large, critical agenda he's trying to complete before he possibly loses his party majority in the House.

2. Executive Orders are only good for one year (IIRC), and this one will be surely challenged in court, which will take months.

That indicates to me that this is a delaying tactic, the purpose of which is either to provide time for the real parties to get together and craft a stable solution, or is an emergency tactic to prevent opportunistic (or even agenda-driven) agents from doing something truly destructive to the process or the upcoming college season.

There's no political gain in this for Trump, so it must be to prevent something worse from happening that would negatively effect him.
 
#24
#24
1. In a non-election year, Trump would not waste political capital just for headlines (especially with nothing to gain) nor when he has a large, critical agenda he's trying to complete before he possibly loses his party majority in the House.

2. Executive Orders are only good for one year (IIRC), and this one will be surely challenged in court, which will take months.

That indicates to me that this is a delaying tactic, the purpose of which is either to provide time for the real parties to get together and craft a stable solution, or is an emergency tactic to prevent opportunistic (or even agenda-driven) agents from doing something truly destructive to the process or the upcoming college season.

There's no political gain in this for Trump, so it must be to prevent something worse from happening that would negatively effect him.
Presidential EOs don't have a fixed expiration day unless a sunset clause is included.
 
#25
#25
1. In a non-election year, Trump would not waste political capital just for headlines (especially with nothing to gain) nor when he has a large, critical agenda he's trying to complete before he possibly loses his party majority in the House.

2. Executive Orders are only good for one year (IIRC), and this one will be surely challenged in court, which will take months.

That indicates to me that this is a delaying tactic, the purpose of which is either to provide time for the real parties to get together and craft a stable solution, or is an emergency tactic to prevent opportunistic (or even agenda-driven) agents from doing something truly destructive to the process or the upcoming college season.

There's no political gain in this for Trump, so it must be to prevent something worse from happening that would negatively effect him.
Or an emergency tactic to distract from the Epstein matter.
 

VN Store



Back
Top