Did Petrino sabotage Pittman's job?

#4
#4
Probably not directly and probably more so Arkansas donors
They wanted Pittman gone and he was a nice guy.
Pittman was probably dealing with a lot of crap and got tired of it.
The minute that Petrino step on campus he was going to get his job back and it was quite obvious Pittman was ready to retire.
The tell tell was that Petrino fired the Defensive staff.
Undercut 40%, planned 60% is my take on it. It probably was discussed before Petrino arrived and went into effect the day he arrived. Pittman was probably aware of it from day 1.
 
Last edited:
#17
#17
Probably not directly and probably more so Arkansas donors
They wanted Pittman gone and he was a nice guy.
Pittman was probably dealing with a lot of crap and got tired of it.
The minute that Petrino step on campus he was going to get his job back and it was quite obvious Pittman was ready to retire.
The tell tell was that Petrino fired the Defensive staff.
Undercut 40%, planned 60% is my take on it. It probably was discussed before Petrino arrived and went into effect the day he arrived. Pittman was probably aware of it from day 1.

Agree, this sounds more like Arkansas donor interference than actually Petrino himself. Petrino probably tried to work with Pittman.
 
#23
#23
Pittman hired him. You are always responsible for the choices you make. No reason to feel bad for his situation. It was probably as good of a situation as an OL coach could have hoped for in capitalizing on his coaching abilities. If he had stayed at Georgia, It would take him 20 years or more to make what he has made as the HC.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top