2024 Presidential Race

So you want people to vote based on your legit reasons. What if someone believes your reasons aren't legit? Hopefully you respect their views and don't vote
I’m talking about legit reasons that make this country better, whatever that may be.

And I’m the one that shouldn’t vote….got it.


Imagine saying, “I can’t vote for Trump, he’s not a female”

Or

“I’m voting Trump because we don’t need a female president”

The amount of times I’ve seen that all across different social media platforms is sickening.
 
The United States was never involved in the slave trade, so I don't even see how its possible. Now something the U.S. has done was compensate the Japanese Americans for what happen to them during WWII i.e. camps. This is somewhat logical.

Under this logic shouldn't descendants of the people that fought in the Civil War get reparations?

Legally and logically there is nothing that is owed to these people, if anything they owe the U.S.
I Agree no reparations, but the sale or purchase does constitute some involvement in the trade. American Brokers
 
God I can’t wait to watch Trump skulldrag Camel Toe in the debates. Just to stick to policy and a referendum on her lowest VP approval rating in history.
The problem is that Trump can't articulate any of his policies with details

He isn't going to debate her. It would be stupid. If he can dial down the negative discourse, he should win easily.
 
I’m talking about legit reasons that make this country better, whatever that may be.

And I’m the one that shouldn’t vote….got it.
Sure but you're basing their legitimacy on your own personal reasons. If someone feels a female potus would make a difference then why is that illegitimate? If someone views based on an issue that should be left to the states is that legitimate? Is being a single issue voter a legitimate stance? Do you view a vote based on political party to be legit?

Define what makes the country better without it being a personal opinion. Can people disagree on that and still cast a legit vote?
 
Sure but you're basing their legitimacy on your own personal reasons. If someone feels a female potus would make a difference then why is that illegitimate? If someone views based on an issue that should be left to the states is that legitimate? Is being a single issue voter a legitimate stance? Do you view a vote based on political party to be legit?

My personal reasons being making the country better, however that is. I don’t care how that is.

If someone votes because of the reasons I posted, they don’t deserve to vote. This isn’t a popularity contest, this isn’t to save your feelings. This is about the United States.

I’ll post the examples again.

“I’m not voting Trump because he’s mean”

Or

“I’m voting Trump we don’t need a female president”



The amount of times I’ve seen this across all social media platforms, sickening. Don’t vote if that’s your reason. Those have nothing to do with our country.
 
Last edited:
A Fox Business guest shocked the network's audience when he referred to vice-president Kamala Harris as the 'original Hawk Tuah' girl.

Podcaster Alec Lace made the comments on a July 21 appearance where he discussed president Joe Biden's less-than-stellar debate performance against Donald Trump and pondered on the Democratic Party's future.

'Kamala Harris, she is the original Hawk Tuah girl - that's the way she got where she is, and the party is going downhill if it's in her hands,' Lace said.

The provocative right-winger was comparing the Democrat to Hailey Welch, who shot to viral fame after she described spitting as part of a sexual act during an on-street interview.

1721839786323.png

 
I Agree no reparations, but the sale or purchase does constitute some involvement in the trade. American Brokers

The United States as far as I know was never involved in the trade, transport, or purchase of slaves. I think I uncovered where there was a contract a third party used slaves to build U.S. ships and that is about it. Now, there could have been something that was on the fringe of benefit if that but even that is suspect. The United States really wasn't involved in slavery in that form, conscription, yup.

The United States even passed Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves of 1807, which had an effective 1808 date. The United States actually banned the use of U.S. flagged ships in slave trade in 1794.

If they have a beef its with the companies and people that are long since gone with no recourse, of course, they could all go to the African countries as they were the original slave owners from which they were purchased.

Paying descendants of slave owners for slavery seems fairly strange to me.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Sudden Impact
Mocking a disabled person isn't a specific example? Insulting McCain, saying, "I like people who don't get captured", isn't a specific example? The list is pretty long

That Biden has been a complete joke is irrelevant
So words. Not actions. Yes, I already admitted he can be an a!!hole, but what has he actually done that's horrible besides hurt someone's feelings. I keep hearing about feelings. BFD. Over and over we keep hearing, Hitler, threat to democracy, a dictator that will never leave or trying to prevent people from voting. All words with no proof or explanation as to how and why they have come to these conclusions. More and more words is all we hear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
A Fox Business guest shocked the network's audience when he referred to vice-president Kamala Harris as the 'original Hawk Tuah' girl.

Podcaster Alec Lace made the comments on a July 21 appearance where he discussed president Joe Biden's less-than-stellar debate performance against Donald Trump and pondered on the Democratic Party's future.

'Kamala Harris, she is the original Hawk Tuah girl - that's the way she got where she is, and the party is going downhill if it's in her hands,' Lace said.

The provocative right-winger was comparing the Democrat to Hailey Welch, who shot to viral fame after she described spitting as part of a sexual act during an on-street interview.

View attachment 661443

That's bottom of the barrel stuff from Fox
 
The problem is that Trump can't articulate any of his policies with details

He isn't going to debate her. It would be stupid. If he can dial down the negative discourse, he should win easily.
not hard to articulate …abortion back to the states, drill baby drill and lower corporate tax to 15%
 
So words. Not actions. Yes, I already admitted he can be an a!!hole, but what has he actually done that's horrible besides hurt someone's feelings. I keep hearing about feelings. BFD. Over and over we keep hearing, Hitler, threat to democracy, a dictator that will never leave or trying to prevent people from voting. All words with no proof or explanation as to how and why they have come to these conclusions. More and more words is all we hear.
Repeated scripts from MSNBC and Maddow smirking when she talks
 
So words. Not actions. Yes, I already admitted he can be an a!!hole, but what has he actually done that's horrible besides hurt someone's feelings. I keep hearing about feelings. BFD. Over and over we keep hearing, Hitler, threat to democracy, a dictator that will never leave or trying to prevent people from voting. All words with no proof or explanation as to how and why they have come to these conclusions. More and more words is all we hear.
How about nominating a candidate that isn't hypersensitive, thin skinned and extremely insecure? 😉
 
My personal reasons being making the country better, however that is. I don’t care how that is.

If someone votes because of the reasons I posted, they don’t deserve to vote. This isn’t a popularity contest, this isn’t to save your feelings. This is about the United States.

I’ll post the examples again.

“I’m not voting Trump because he’s mean”

Or

“I’m voting Trump we don’t need a female president”



The amount of times I’ve seen this across all social media platforms, sickening. Don’t vote if that’s your reason. Those have nothing to do with our country.
You're sadly mistaken if you think the character of the president makes no difference.
 
Research her and get back to me........she is trumpism......therein lies your answer.
he asked you what YOU don't like. he asked for specifics. but you can only speak in generalities, by telling him to research a third party who isn't directly related to the initial question.
 

VN Store



Back
Top