MAD
Arsenal FC, Detroit Lions
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2006
- Messages
- 48,326
- Likes
- 118,035
Your take describes last night match so well. Love how you have great insight on everything during a game especially the little details. I thought the same thing on the yellow card as well.Not what I had hoped to see, but also, not all that surprising. We were nervous and tight to start, they were pretty confident but I think the first half showed them we came to play. The yellow card on Simmons was a joke. Also, not having our regular keeper in net, keeping our defense in order, really hurt.
As kregman said above "their depth got us." I'll go one step further and say the quality of their depth added greatly to their effectiveness, in the second half especially. Also, we got very little from our midfielders offensively. We didn't put sufficient pressure on their back four and they heavily marked our scorers as a result.
We also really missed Claudia. Do we not have anyone, other than her, than can provide good service on corners? What is it with us and corner kicks?
Our defense was pretty good...until it fell apart late. Their first goal was mostly luck, their second was a minor defensive mistake which they capitalized on, and the third was when our defenders got totally exposed going forward to get more bodies into our attack. Sometimes you get bit in the butt by that strategy but down two nil late in the match what else can you do?
I was very pleased to see our passing greatly improved from the midfield forward. Our back line still as lots of work to do.
All in all, I think we will benefit from the match as we go forward. No doubt it's a big lift to take on one of the top teams in women's soccer, on their pitch, to open the season. Great crowd that was loud and proud, too. As well they should be. North Carolina is a VERY good side. We ain't too bad either.
Onward Ladies!!!
I was thinking the same thing when it got under 10 minutes in the first half, keep a a clean sheet. That goal at around 7 minutes to go was very demoralizing. Tennessee was definitely the better side for the first 30. Looking forward to Sunday.Just back from Chapel Hill, where my friends (UNC grads) and I stayed in the same (nice) hotel as the team. It had been a while since I been to UNC, and it's a very nice campus and college town. Met Claire Rain's parents--a nice couple--on the way to get a couple of brews before the game. The new UNC soccer stadium, named after Anson Dorrance, is a beauty: Seats about 4K, comfortable seat-back seats, big, impressive scoreboard---and a field that looked immaculate. The crowd was also big and impressive on a beautiful night for soccer. It was disappointing to watching the starting lineup be introduced .... and no Romig. I was told she tested for Covid sometime yesterday. That was a blow.
As for the game itself, I disagree with Strange on a couple of points. First, maybe we were a bit nervy in the first minute or two, but I think the Vols actually settled into this game quite nicely and quite quickly--and IMO, we had slightly the better of play in the first 25 minutes or so. We did a good job of defending in the middle of the field and had a few forays into their attacking third. We were extremely competitive--as we should be.
I also (politely) disagree with Strange about our midfield: In fact, our midfield posed most of our attacking threat in this game. Five of our 8 shots on goal came from the midfield, and our best scoring chance was a belter from Fusco earlyish in the second half that forced to the UNC keeper to make a great save. Huff had 4 shots--all on goal. Fusco and Huff played well: At least three of Huffs shots came when she got the ball and was able to drive into some space at the top of the box and shoot. Unfortunately, she didn't really test the keeper on any of them in the way that Fusco did--and given how well Huff can shoot, perhaps she could have done a bit better with her shot placement--but I have to look at the replay to say for sure. She also had another couple of dribbles to the top of the box and, when I thought she had room to shoot, instead laid the ball off....to players who were marked and not open and nothing came of either of them.
Our real problem offensively is that we didn't get enough out of our forwards--George and Thomas. This might be the only game I can remember in which George and Thomas were mostly ineffective. They each struggled to impact the game--though Thomas did have one shot in the second half. and George might have earned one corner, but I wouldn't swear to that. UNC is a good defensive team--maybe even very good. I think Dorrance said a few days ago that he thought this was one of his better defensive teams--and the unc centerbacks were particularly strong last night. Maycee Bell is one of the best CBs in the country--has been for a few years--and after the game Dorrance praised Bell's defensive partner, Tori Hanson, for playing brilliantly and making a lot of key challenges. UNC named Hanson as its player of the game. We tried to get the ball to our forwards in the game--but they were marked tightly and could neither find space with the ball or beat their defenders with the dribble. George ended playing only 57 minutes--which is certainly low for her. Simmonds got 27 minutes of action--and she looks to have the potential to be good: She has nice size, and is athletic. She's already helping this team.
When UNC sent in about 6 subs at the 16' mark, and we sent in, maybe, 3/4, I thought: Let's just get to the half scoreless. But then Grant was left somewhat unmarked on the right wing, lofted the ball toward goal, and it hit the crossbar, bounced down and was kicked in by Gambone and suddenly, after playing a solid first half, we were down a goal.
I thought we started the 2nd half strong as well--the first 10+ minutes or so--but the Hanson header off the UNC corner at the 65' market was huge and a turning point. She simply made a very nice play on the ball with her head to put the Heels up by 2.
I agree that Dipasupil would have helped us with her corner deliveries, had she been available to play. I think Zalusky took most--maybe all but one-of corner kicks, and a couple of her balls were less than good. Zalusky was fairly solid, overall, but certainly Dipasupil may have helped us in run of play as she is an experienced starter--but how much is hard to say. We've simply got to do a better job of converting corners into goals if the Vols want to be the team they think they can be this year. I think we came close on one corner, but that was it.
After the 2nd UNC goal, we started to fade. Whether it was because of the psychological blow of falling two behind, or just fatique, but UNC put a lot of pressure on our goal in the last 20+ minutes, and of course scored a third. It's telling that UNC had 8 shots in the first half and 16 in the second. I do think UNC's quality depth was a factor in this game, and the 'heels are a team that can wear an opponent down--Dorrance said he thought UNC wore down BYU in their last exhibition match--and they probably did the same to us. I don't think our subs played badly at all; indeed, I think Hennessey, Chatterton, Simmonds, Midgley and others can makes a serious contribution to this team---and they HAVE to.
That said, I absolutely think that we lose something defensively when Burdette is not on the field. That is not to criticize Washington, who is apparently our 2nd team defensive midfielder. I'd have to rewatch the game to see how she performed, but we are noticeably less strong defensively when Burdette is getting rest. Washington seems to have the size and athleticism to be an effective defensive midfielder--and she is still young (didn't play at all last year). She's GOT to develop and really start to show her qualities.
One big lesson from this game is that we have to finish games strongly. You never want to struggle in the last 20 minutes. It wasn't an issue last year, so there's no doubt that UNC had something to do with our late-game struggles last night.
I thought Rain and Fusco might have been our two best players last night, overall, and Huff was good. Zazzara, a RS freshman, performed admirably in goal in a very tough spot. Credit to her. It will be interesting to see if we continue to play with a back three going forward. To me, it's a bit of a risky formation when you are playing a team as good as UNC--but it does give you a chance to control the midfield, which we did at times.
We are playing what is said to be a good SMU team on Sunday (ranked preseason #20)--and this is a game where we really want and need to show out. That will be followed by Duke--another powerhouse team that will be another unc-style test. Though the Blue Devils don't play as fast as UNC does, they are very good. We should develop some mettle after these testers.
That one hurt credit the NC player for being there but it hits the top bar drops right to the feet of the only open player in the box. It is one thing to roll in a bunch of players off the bench but quite another when most of them would be starting on other good teams. I thought we came out tight the second half but we came out all guns blazing to start the game. Sunday will tell us a lot. PS. I think Burdette send a little message with that late hard foul.I was thinking the same thing when it got under 10 minutes in the first half, keep a a clean sheet. That goal at around 7 minutes to go was very demoralizing. Tennessee was definitely the better side for the first 30. Looking forward to Sunday.
I enjoyed the detailed look-backs on the UNC game, guys. I still haven't actually seen it, but I almost feel like I did. Soccer wasn't yet a thing in the South when I was growing up and playing multiple sports all year round, so I've had to learn what little I do know as an adult with no experience playing it myself. As someone who learns from doing, it has been an ongoing struggle. I still don't understand offsides!