Another thing we could do in this supposed "negative" situation is wait to see if anybody says they were lied to in the end. Even if things have changed it can be done the right way. Because it does happen, intended or not. You can go to the player and explain what's happening and the player can stiil be upset but that's the right way. So until somebody comes out and says they were lied to, like often happens with Saban, there's nothing to worry about. Then again, nobody knows if there's anything to any of this to start with. Lol
I understand that this type of discussion is why we have message boards. However, this is getting a little silly.
Leb and the other random guy ranting in this thread, here are the 100% facts you have.
1. Dormady committed
2. Jennings committed.
3. Our staff visited Jones.
4. Someone crystal balled Jones to TN
You may be right in your ASSUMPTIONS but that is all they are at this point...assumptions. You may call it deductive reasoning...it is still at best an educated guess. It is unwise and somewhat irresponsible to be so dogmatic/inflammatory about something that is based on very limited information and assumption.
You are right. I apologize. Everyone else on here is speaking strictly based on facts with supporting cites.
What I do know, Jennings and Dormady were both told they are the only qb commits that were to be sought and signed this season if they committed to UT. Now, it has been confirmed a UT coach has visited with a guy that had turned UT down and that guy has now decommitted from UF and says UT is his lead choice at the moment.
People challenged me on what I know. I provided links to the information that supported my thoughts and spelled out where my info was coming from, a Vol friend that is stationed in the area that has been to numerous games and practices and has gotten to know folks directly involved. I do not know what else I can do or say that would make some of you understand I am not just speculating or assuming.
I find it interesting that people that are speculating and assuming themselves are attacking me for speculating and assuming when I've provided backup and they haven't. I also find it funny how a couple on here have absolutely nothing worthwhile to contribute just hang around to stir the pot.
I'll leave it up to all you insiders and experts now. I should have done this sooner but got caught up in the crap. I'll just sit back and watch it play out and hope it works out best for all involved.
Again, I argued with idiots and now I am perceived an idiot. That's my bad. No one else to blame but me.
And again I'm going to reiterate that none of these three IF we take three will find a better competition for being the starter. Jennings will get his shot and if he makes it he will be a QB. QB is the most important position on the field so if he is a good QB he will not be converted IF not he has tremendous upside at S. The kid wins no matter what.MSU is not an upgrade.
So you are saying that Bama, tOSU, and Auburn have told him that they are only recruiting him to play QB for them?
Before answering that... consider that tOSU already has two QB commits with one of them being Gibson. They also have a Fr starter who will be hard to displace even if the other two QB's come back healthy. Alabama has a 5* QB commit who is rated the #1 dual threat in the US... and the #10 player overall according to Rivals. Auburn doesn't have a QB commit right now but they landed good ones in the past two years AND will continue to sign top QB recruits.
Frankly, I'm not sure that tOSU or Bama would take his commit... and Auburn would probably take it on basically the same terms UT supposedly did (QB first but then another position if he doesn't impress).
He is actually blessed in that he doesn't have to make it as a QB to have a very bright future in football.
Hey guys. Pleasant conversation you're having. A couple of thoughts to contribute...
1.) I think Butch is an excellent communicator and evaluator of talent. They rate player performances in practice and in games. I doubt Nate Pete is surprised that so far he has performed poorly at QB for Tennessee. I also doubt the evaluation of his performances haven't been clearly and openly communicated to him. (I wouldn't be surprised if he was asked to make room.)
2.) For the same reasons (communication skills, evaluation skills), I think Butch has communicated the need for depth to his EE QBs. I tend to believe that Jennings and Dormady have already heard from Butch that we are in a tight spot from a depth perspective, and the 3rd QB helps prevent a key injury derailing his 3rd season.
I know there are lots of perceived negatives to this, but I think Butch comes across with a lot of integrity, and open communication about achieving the goal of winning makes this all plausible and attractive to me.
Most of these arguments are all very tired from the 2014 TG fiasco. Let's just see how this plays out...
OK. I'll bite. How do you know that?That is exactly what I am saying, and I don't have to consider anything. All of those schools were most definietly recruiting him at QB.
That may be true and doesn't do a thing to prove that they were recruiting him as a QB.What you need to consider is none of those other guys were committed when JJ pulled the trigger. His final 3 was UT, Auburn, Bama. He committed to us and other schools kept recruiting QB's. That's how the system works! Believe me, in April when he committed, all of those schools would have taken his commitment.
I'm all for us taking 3 RBs, but I do see the problem with taking 3 QBs especially with Kendall coming in next year. Not to mention the offer we have out to the Oden kid. Seems like a waste of scholly's or rather a logjam of scholly's that will be the same year. 1 of the 3 is guaranteed to transfer. Possibly 2.
And again I'm going to reiterate that none of these three IF we take three will find a better competition for being the starter. Jennings will get his shot and if he makes it he will be a QB. QB is the most important position on the field so if he is a good QB he will not be converted IF not he has tremendous upside at S. The kid wins no matter what.
Thousands of examples to choose from, but I'll settle for a recent one. Jake Heaps was regarded by some as the top QB in the 2010 class...picked BYU...started by midseason...played very well and had a bright future. Two transfers later he probably has enough alumni connections to land a well paying jobs...I think he was the only QB in his class.
I'm all for us taking 3 RBs, but I do see the problem with taking 3 QBs especially with Kendall coming in next year. Not to mention the offer we have out to the Oden kid. Seems like a waste of scholly's or rather a logjam of scholly's that will be the same year. 1 of the 3 is guaranteed to transfer. Possibly 2.
I'm not sure what point you were trying to prove to me. That 1 QB isn't enough? I agree. 2 is cool, let them duke it out and eventually redshirting could allow both to play as starters at some point in their career. 3 in one class though? Eh. Think it's a waste, we have other needs.
OK. I'll bite. How do you know that?
That may be true and doesn't do a thing to prove that they were recruiting him as a QB.
Some of you have seen him more than I have. In the limited video I've seen, he looks like an athlete playing QB rather than an athletic QB. I was blessed years ago to see Heath Shuler play in HS. He was definitely a QB who was a great athlete. He could have played college as a WR, DB, or RB... he had that kind of athleticism. But he was definitely a QB.
And again... let's say that CBJ satisfied your sensibilities and those of a couple of others here and stops pursuing Jones. Then let's say that neither of the others work out. Or... let's say Jones goes on to be another Cam Newton type of player. Will you still feel all good and morally superior?
There are costs to whatever decision is made.... and benefits. There's nothing against the rules or immoral here. It is amoral... it is a business transaction. Let's say you apply for one of two open positions at a good paying company and everything from their side is very positive with them fully intending on hiring you. But then let's say that a last moment applicant just blows you out of the water.... you probably aren't getting the job if they can't hire both of you. Similar situation here.
At some point, maybe the NCAA will allow for an August or September signing date for EE's. To me that would make a lot of sense for both the school and recruit. But until then there will be opportunity for conflict between not disappointing a recruit and doing what is best for the program.
PS- some of the departures or potential departures may very well leave the door open for signing all three. We pretty much know if that happens all three will not remain QB's at UT... but it would enable UT to let them play into their position on the roster.
So we should just stack talent as much as we possibly can??
Craziness!!
Of course. :crazy:
i think the kid signs with Ole Miss even though he said TN leads. Ole Miss is a new offer in the past week leading up to his recruitment. I haven't looked at their QB commits but i know based on on the field and current roster they need a QB bad and will prob push more than us
Sheriron Jones has withdrawn his verbal from Florida and says that Tennessee is number one on his list. I am excited for this guy if he chooses Tennessee, he is an excellent dual threat qb and would work fine in this system. Hopefully, come February he'll be signing his name to come to Good Ol Rocky Top.