27 Things That Every American Should Know About The National Debt

#1

DEFENDTHISHOUSE

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2006
Messages
28,633
Likes
32,092
#1
27 Things That Every American Should Know About The National Debt

Interesting read.

The following are 27 things that every American should know about the national debt....

#1 It took more than 200 years for the U.S. national debt to reach 1 trillion dollars. In 1986, the U.S. national debt reached 2 trillion dollars. In 1992, the U.S. national debt reached 4 trillion dollars. In 2005, the U.S. national debt doubled again and reached 8 trillion dollars. Now the U.S. national debt is about to cross the 16 trillion dollar mark. How long can this kind of exponential growth go on?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2
#2
It is being projected that the U.S. national debt will surpass 23 trillion dollars in 2015.

Keep printing baby!



Very interesting read.
 
#4
#4
#4 Since Barack Obama entered the White House, the U.S. national debt has increased by an average of more than $64,000 per taxpayer.

#5 Barack Obama will become the first president to run deficits of more than a trillion dollars during each of his first four years in office.


Those two items alone should be the end of Obama's re-election chances.


Edit: not that Obama is the only one to blame, this has been coming since 1913.
 
Last edited:
#5
#5
#4 Since Barack Obama entered the White House, the U.S. national debt has increased by an average of more than $64,000 per taxpayer.

#5 Barack Obama will become the first president to run deficits of more than a trillion dollars during each of his first four years in office.


Those two items alone should be the end of Obama's re-election chances.


Edit: not that Obama is the only one to blame, this has been coming since 1913.

I'm not on Obama fan by any means, but a major part of the trillion dollar increases are the result of the continued borrowing for the wars as a result of the previous administration. So, it's not entirely Obama's doing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#6
#6
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#7
#7
I'm not on Obama fan by any means, but a major part of the trillion dollar increases are the result of the continued borrowing for the wars as a result of the previous administration. So, it's not entirely Obama's doing.

I guess you didn't see my edit.

O is certainly not the only one holding the bag. Yes, Bush's wars did a lot of the damage, funny how i don't see Obama ending any of the wars, wait a second, didn't he bomb libya as well? Has he cut spending? No, he has spent at record levels.
Then you have the fed and qe1, qe2 ect, ect, ect.
 
#8
#8
I guess you didn't see my edit.

O is certainly not the only one holding the bag. Yes, Bush's wars did a lot of the damage, funny how i don't see Obama ending any of the wars, wait a second, didn't he bomb libya as well? Has he cut spending? No, he has spent at record levels.
Then you have the fed and qe1, qe2 ect, ect, ect.

We ended operations in Iraq, didn't we?
 
#11
#11

Yes, and had he ended it when he originally wanted to it would have been a huge mess. There's plenty of blame to go around. Bush has certainly had a role in the deficit continuing to spiral out of control and again what he did during his presidency is still affecting it to this day. Both Obama and Bush have driven this country closer to bankruptcy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#14
#14
The Republican-controlled House refused to provide funding for the closure of Gitmo.

he signed and exec order allowing the indefinite detention of prisoners there and they are now spending $40mil to renovate it. It was an empty promise
 
#15
#15
I'm not on Obama fan by any means, but a major part of the trillion dollar increases are the result of the continued borrowing for the wars as a result of the previous administration. So, it's not entirely Obama's doing.

Iraq and Afghanistan average about $160billion/annually - nothing to sneeze at but even without that spending the deficits would be over a trillion annually for Obama.
 
#20
#20
Just watching the value of our currency dropping like a rock should be enough for most people. But it isnt.
 
#21
#21
Yes, and had he ended it when he originally wanted to it would have been a huge mess. There's plenty of blame to go around. Bush has certainly had a role in the deficit continuing to spiral out of control and again what he did during his presidency is still affecting it to this day. Both Obama and Bush have driven this country closer to bankruptcy.

Good post.
 
#23
#23
I'm not on Obama fan by any means, but a major part of the trillion dollar increases are the result of the continued borrowing for the wars as a result of the previous administration. So, it's not entirely Obama's doing.

How much of the stimulus was spent on war effort?

About exactly ZERO!

Highway_Obama_Shovel_Ready.jpg


67qwxt.jpg


eprb7m.jpg







We ended operations in Iraq, didn't we?

I talked with a friend of mine Monday who was babysitting his grandchildren while his daughter was with her husband who had just been blown up (his second time) in Iraq.

So I would say HELL NO!

114694_600.jpg






he signed and exec order allowing the indefinite detention of prisoners there and they are now spending $40mil to renovate it. It was an empty promise

But just thaink what that will do for the wold of soccer and the hallal resturant business.

Jezz PJ, can't you be postitive about anything?

b46sso.png








+ 10!

And oldie but goodie:

The National Debt | American History Lives at American Heritage

Thomas Jefferson favored “a government rigorously frugal and simple, applying all the possible savings of the public revenue to the discharge of the national debt.” And Andrew Jackson set as a goal for his administration the elimination of the debt, after which “our population will be relieved from a considerable portion of its present burthens, and will find not only new motives to patriotic affection, but additional means for the display of individual enterprise.”
----------------------
(Note, Jackson paid off the national debt within three years after eliminating the central bank.)gs

UNTIL THE MIDDLE of the twentieth century, borrowing to fund war efforts caused the greatest impact on the national debt; the War of 1812, the Civil War, and the two world wars each created mammoth deficits equal to more than half the total government expenditures during those years. The debt reached $127 million as a result of the War of 1812; the Civil War pushed the figure from $90 million to $2.8 billion; and it climbed to $25.5 billion by the end of World War I and to $269.4 billion by the end of World War II.

In the 112 peacetime years between 1791 and 1916, by comparison, there were 82 surpluses, 16 of them so great that revenues exceeded expenditures by more than 50 percent.
-----------------------------

FOR A CENTURY and a half neither good times nor bad substantially influenced economic policy away from the traditional view dating back to Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations , which first appeared in 1776. A balanced budget and limited government activity in peacetime were essential to economic stability. Smith had written that once a nation “foresees the facility of borrowing, it dispenses itself from the duty of saving.” Then, in the depths of the Great Depression, Franklin Roosevelt embraced the theory outlined by the British economist John Maynard Keynes, who held that government has an active economic role to play- indeed, that increased spending, even at the expense of an inflated national debt, stimulates the economy and promotes growth. “I expect the approval of Congress and the public for additional appropriations,” the President said in 1938, “if they become necessary to save thousands of American families from dire need.”
-----------------------------

No doubt the old nineteenth-century fears that a borrowing government could be likened to “rapacious wolves seeking whom they may devour” have subsided. But contemporary economists note that deficits still are associated with “a lack of discipline, with fiscal irresponsibility, with waste and corruption, and even with socialism.” Moreover, the debt becomes increasingly expensive to maintain as interest payments to creditors amount annually to a growing percentage of the gross national product, presently about 3.5 percent. Even more important, most experts agree, deficit spending promotes inflation by adding to the nation’s money supply and boosts interest rates by contributing to increased competition for credit with private investors. As for the current deficit projections, congressional leaders have said that they are “terrifying” and could lead to a “financial collapse.”

210k0ll.jpg
 

VN Store



Back
Top