3 Areas Of Concern Regarding John McCain

#1

Sudden Impact

Who we are is what We do with what We have!
Joined
Jan 7, 2007
Messages
13,997
Likes
7,333
#1
1) No Friend to the Military Vet Look at Voting Record and the Veteran's Assn Ratings

He has even voted against providing funds for improving veterans hospitals as well as for research into prosthetics for veterans who have have returned home with missing limbs.

• In 2008 McCain opposed the new GI Bill which offers funds for higher education to veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. In a lame explanation for his position, McCain said the prospect of a free college education would prompt many servicemen and women to leave the armed forces and not re-enlist.

• In 1991 McCain voted against an amendment that would have allocated $53 million on prosthetic research for veterans who had lost limbs.

• In 2006 McCain opposed an amendment that would have added $430 million for veterans outpatient services. McCain was one of only 16 senators to vote against the amendment.

• In 2005 McCain voted against an appropriation of $1.9 billion for veterans hospitals so that they could adequately care for soldiers returning from war.

• In 2005 McCain opposed an amendment that would have provided an additional $2.8 billion for veterans medical care.

• In 2006 McCain voted no on a plan to add $1.5 billion to veterans programs with money used by closing some corporate tax loopholes.

• In 2006 McCain opposed a plan that would have automatically increased funding for veterans health programs by indexing the appropriations to inflation. The bill would have automatically indexed spending to rise or fall depending on the number of veterans.

• In 2005 McCain voted against a measure that would have targeted $500 million for veterans mental health programs.

• In 2006 McCain voted against an amendment that would have increased funding for military and veterans hospitals by $19 billion.

• In 2005 McCain voted no on an amendment that would have provided a $10 million increase in the budget for counseling for veterans trying to readjust to civilian life after serving in Afghanistan or Iraq.

• In 2005 McCain opposed an amendment that would have increased funding for the Veterans Affairs Department by nearly $2 billion. The money would have gone to regional health networks for veterans and to increase mental healthcare for returning veterans.

• In 2003 McCain voted against an amendment that would have increased health benefits for veterans by $1.3 billion.

• In 2003 McCain voted no on an amendment that would have provided $20.3 billion over 10 years to give members of the National Guard and reserves greater access to federal healthcare programs.

In 2005 the Disabled American Veterans Association assigned McCain a rating of 25 (on a scale of 0 to 100). Obama received a rating of 92 from the Disabled American Veterans Association.

In 2006 McCain was given a 20 rating by the Disabled American Veterans Association. In contrast, Obama supported the disabled veterans group’s position 80 percent of the time.

The Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans association has tracked more than 300 key votes of concern to veterans since the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It gives John McCain an overall grade of D. Obama was given a rating of B+.

The Vietnam Veterans of America’s legislative scorecard reports that on 19 key votes on veterans issues since Obama came to the Senate, he voted for the position favored by the association on 13 measures. McCain voted for the position favored by the association three times.

There are 24 million veterans in America today. There is an equal number of veterans’ spouses and children of voting age who are deeply concerned about veterans issues and benefits.

2) Aided Rashid Khalidi more than Ayers or Obama. 448,000 dollars

John McCain's 'Trick or Treat'? - Fact Checker

3) Does not understand the Economy. The attachment below is by one of McCain's Economic Advisors. Mark Zandi.

McCain to New York: Drop Dead - The Plank
 
#3
#3
I like that he'll shoot down spending bills

The bottom line is that he believes wholeheartedly that the VA system wastes more money than humanly possible and that any more money poured that direction is good chasing bad. He's exactly right. The VA is a bloated, near worthless piece of garbage with no means of getting better because there are no standards enforced and its patients don't have an alternative.

That broken system needs to be vanquished.
 
#4
#4
To support an unecessary War in Iraq and then not to provide for the soldiers in the aftermath of it is an Oxymoran. If there is a problem then fix it. Instead, you like McCain agree that it is broke which is obvious. He is and has been in a position to fix the problem and has done nothing to do so. Head in the sand on Veteran's Needs.
 
#5
#5
To support an unecessary War in Iraq and then not to provide for the soldiers in the aftermath of it is an Oxymoran. If there is a problem then fix it. Instead, you like McCain agree that it is broke which is obvious. He is and has been in a position to fix the problem and has done nothing to do so. Head in the sand on Veteran's Needs.
How does he fix a bureacracy the nature of the VA without simply withholding funds? He's not in a position to slam the door on the VA, but he doesn't have to be complicit in continuing to fund an amazingly wasteful organization.

I like that he doesn't want to fund the VA medical system.

Who is Oxymoran?
 
#6
#6
To support an unecessary War in Iraq and then not to provide for the soldiers in the aftermath of it is an Oxymoran. If there is a problem then fix it. Instead, you like McCain agree that it is broke which is obvious. He is and has been in a position to fix the problem and has done nothing to do so. Head in the sand on Veteran's Needs.

yes because throwing the money at the VA has always been a good way to fix veteran problems.
 
#7
#7
McCain has explained his voting on this issue many times...but BHO gives ANY reason why he does or doesn't do something and all of the minions just accept it
 
#8
#8
That is right, blame it on the Veterans. It's their fault, John McCain has no say in the matter. It is wasteful spending and if we ignore the problem it will go away. He hasn't done anything to help and his non support or lack of involvement is not his choice. It is obviously the Democrats. When something does not work he is clear and it is the other guy's or other party's fault and when it is going right it is his vision that got us there. McCain politics is ignore the problems and reap the benefits of any successes whether involved in it or not. Stand up and explain yourself (JM) take responsibility of your actions instead of choosing what you will or will not take responsibility for. He has spent more time trying not to lose this election versus developing a set of balls to win it.
 
#10
#10
yes because throwing the money at the VA has always been a good way to fix veteran problems.

You have manage to Deflect the VA Argument. It is called deflective reasoning which ends up blaming the organization or the other party for problem. It like talking to a wall move on to 2 or 3 then and rebuke that.

The facts are there for 1, 2, 3 just argue your way out of it. Its OK.
 
#11
#11
That is right, blame it on the Veterans. It's their fault, John McCain has no say in the matter. It is wasteful spending and if we ignore the problem it will go away. He hasn't done anything to help and his non support or lack of involvement is not his choice. It is obviously the Democrats. When something does not work he is clear and it is the other guy's or other party's fault and when it is going right it is his vision that got us there. McCain politics is ignore the problems and reap the benefits of any successes whether involved in it or not. Stand up and explain yourself (JM) take responsibility of your actions instead of choosing what you will or will not take responsibility for. He has spent more time trying not to lose this election versus developing a set of balls to win it.
He has voiced an opinion very similar to mine on many different occasions. He's not blaming the veterans in the least. He's blaming our idiotic congress for continuing to fund a broken organization.
 
#13
#13
what % of your last year when you were fully capable pay do you receive as a pension? and are you incapable of finding other work?
 
#14
#14
I would say as a disabled veteran of which I am you have no clue.
he might not, but my experience with the process has proven it to be pathetic. I have some very close friends receiving permanent stipends for some very lame crap.

Our vets need to be taken care of and the current VA has no remote interest in handling vet problems. The administration is a bureacracy bent of self perpetuation, more money and lobbying congress. Actual vets are far down the priority list for the slugs running the place.
 
#15
#15
what % of your last year when you were fully capable pay do you receive as a pension? and are you incapable of finding other work?

The rates are on the web site look them up. Not very generous.

I am now a self employed successful Broker.

Generous when it comes to disable veterans and benefits is not the word I would use or you should use.

You are in the "Outside looking in Crew" believing whatever suits your agenda or your candidates agenda to get elected. If it does not directly affect you, you ignore it or make cute statements about it and move on.

"Generous" is not the word to use but you choose it.

Disabled Veterans deserve the best because of the sacrifaces they make without any course of rebuttal.
 
Last edited:
#16
#16
You are in the "Outside looking in Crew" believing whatever suits your agenda or your candidates agenda to get elected. If it does not directly affect you so you ignore it or make cute statements about it and move on.

I'm sure you would never do something like that.
 
#17
#17
he might not, but my experience with the process has proven it to be pathetic. I have some very close friends receiving permanent stipends for some very lame crap.

Our vets need to be taken care of and the current VA has no remote interest in handling vet problems. The administration is a bureacracy bent of self perpetuation, more money and lobbying congress. Actual vets are far down the priority list for the slugs running the place.

You know you should report them or call it into question. Disability is not a privilegde it is a right and should only be given to the deserving. When it is given to the undeserving it screws the ones that really need it. In my case I could receive more money and more benefits than I am receiving but have chosen not too because it drains the system. It is a sacriface that I am making personally.
 
#19
#19
You know you should report them or call it into question. Disability is not a privilegde it is a right and should only be given to the deserving. When it is given to the undeserving it screws the ones that really need it. In my case I could receive more money and more benefits than I am receiving but have chosen not too because it drains the system. It is a sacriface that I am making personally.
they legitimately have the maladies for which they are being paid, but there is no way those maladies are a function of their military service.
 
#20
#20
I like that he'll shoot down spending bills

The bottom line is that he believes wholeheartedly that the VA system wastes more money than humanly possible and that any more money poured that direction is good chasing bad. He's exactly right. The VA is a bloated, near worthless piece of garbage with no means of getting better because there are no standards enforced and its patients don't have an alternative.

That broken system needs to be vanquished.

not supporting funding does not equal fixing the problem.
 
#21
#21
not supporting funding does not equal fixing the problem.
I don't disagree, but I don't know how he fixes the problem as 1 man in a 100 person debating body. I think voting to withhold funds was simply his voicing that more money is only going to make the problem worse.
 
#22
#22
they legitimately have the maladies for which they are being paid, but there is no way those maladies are a function of their military service.

That is sad and it what is wrong with all the disability systems to include welfare and worker compensation etc. Some of this can be blamed on lawyers. LOL. I would hope and would think that J McCain is eligible for Disability and he deserves it. I would think he either does not take it or if he did would give it to a Veteran's type organization......
 
#23
#23
I don't disagree, but I don't know how he fixes the problem as 1 man in a 100 person debating body. I think voting to withhold funds was simply his voicing that more money is only going to make the problem worse.

So why not offer up a solution? Its easy to not fund something and have people assume for their own reasons why he did it, than to say I will not fund this and this is what should be done!
 
#24
#24
not supporting funding does not equal fixing the problem.

I truly understand that, but there is a need for funding to support the facilities of disabled vets. I don't know how many of you have had the experience of going into a Vets hospital and reviewing the services offered or seeing the staffs but it is a serious problem. You would not want to be treated at the facilities nor would you subject any person you loved to it.

Throwing money at the problem does not work and I agree. Putting money into the problem and oversight does begin to fix the problem. Upgrades are needed and have been for close to 20 years. It is a sad state of affairs.
 
#25
#25
So why not offer up a solution? Its easy to not fund something and have people assume for their own reasons why he did it, than to say I will not fund this and this is what should be done!

Because if he did it would bring a lot of criticism from the lobby. For a man who has aspirations for the highest office in the country pissing of the VA admin would be a real problem. I know it's a cop out but that is the nature of politics, the bigger problem in this case IMO.
 

VN Store



Back
Top