This is a legitimate question for anyone who can answer. Has the ncaa totally abandoned the idea of the student-athlete? How do you have guys going to 6 different schools in 5 years? Is ”advancement towards a degree” just removed from scholarship papers and such? I’m a boomer and I remember every year between the end of the season and the bowl game where we would anxiously await to see who was going to be ineligible to play due to grades. Ha. Same for basketball. We always seemed to lose somebody who was ruled ineligible for the spring semester. Are they even going to school? I did hear Mendoza from IU talk about being a graduate student (graduated from Cal) and how he only took classes online now so he had more time. Wow. Wouldn’t you love to see Pavia’s transcript? How many Vandy classes do you think he passed?
The NCAA realized after UNC-Chapel Hill created fake classes, offered those fake classes to anyone, and got caught doing so that even much better than decent academic schools have no shame and will let athletics throw academics under the bus.
UNC academics got some limited probation for the incident, UNC Athletics got no penalty, so it's obvious what matters and UNC-Chapel Hill isn't historically a lousy, who cares school academically.
At that point what is the NCAA supposed to do? The schools will roll over and take it academically if they get caught so that athletics is left alone.
In the UNC case, the NCAA ended up powerless because academics took the hit and the NCAA cannot punish athletes for bogus academics that were available to all students.
Similarly, BTW, Baylor dodged the rape issues there because admins took the position that they didn't just ignore and barely investigate athletes accused of rape, they rarely seriously investigated any campus rape issues. Again, the NCAA was essentially powerless because they can't make a university police the campus for all students better.
It's the admins, really. They will roll completely over to have a winning athletics program.