RetroVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2025
- Messages
- 1,134
- Likes
- 4,355
Some prognosticators have already weighed in on other threads, but thought it might be fun to pull together some wild and crazies here. So if you've made a prediction and want to put it where it can easily be found later
, here's your chance! I'll start it off. I gave [Codex, 5.5, Extra-High] the roster and this prompt:
(And, for those interested, this took up 1% of my weekly allowance under OpenAI's $20/month plan.)
Everything from here on is Codex:
Very rough shooting projection using prior Caldwell-system results
I tried to keep this conservative. The basic idea was to look at players who were new to Kim Caldwell's system, including the 2023-24 Marshall team as first-year Caldwell players, and compare them to their prior season. For Marshall returners, that meant using their 2022-23 Marshall numbers as the baseline.
At a high level, the refined conservative read was:
+4 to +6 points on 2P%
+2 to +3 points on 3P%
small bump at the FT line
For this projection, I used the low end:
+4.0 on 2P%
+2.0 on 3P%
+1.0 on FT%
This is not a prediction. It is just: "What would the roster look like if the low-end Caldwell-system improvement pattern held?"
* = very small or non-college sample, so treat with extra caution.
Bottom line: even using the conservative low-end version of the Caldwell bump, this does not look like a roster that should be projected to shoot worse because of the system. The safer read is that the system has generally raised 2P efficiency, given a modest lift to 3P percentage, and produced mixed-but-slightly-positive FT results.
Here is the roster for next year's Lady Vols basketball team. Assuming that these young women improve their shooting percentages -2 point, 3-point, and FTs - in line with what previous players who transferred into a Kim Caldwell coached team, project their shooting percentages for next season.
(And, for those interested, this took up 1% of my weekly allowance under OpenAI's $20/month plan.)
Everything from here on is Codex:
Very rough shooting projection using prior Caldwell-system results
I tried to keep this conservative. The basic idea was to look at players who were new to Kim Caldwell's system, including the 2023-24 Marshall team as first-year Caldwell players, and compare them to their prior season. For Marshall returners, that meant using their 2022-23 Marshall numbers as the baseline.
At a high level, the refined conservative read was:
+4 to +6 points on 2P%
+2 to +3 points on 3P%
small bump at the FT line
For this projection, I used the low end:
+4.0 on 2P%
+2.0 on 3P%
+1.0 on FT%
This is not a prediction. It is just: "What would the roster look like if the low-end Caldwell-system improvement pattern held?"
| Player | Projected 2P% | Projected 3P% | Projected FT% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gabby Minus | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Avery Mills | 47.1 | 44.7 | 86.1 |
| Naomi White | 45.3 | 39.2 | 80.1 |
| Harper Peterson | 29.0* | 39.5* | N/A |
| Zhen Craft | 50.9 | N/A | 63.0 |
| Rylie Theuerkauf | 49.7 | 42.6 | 87.2 |
| Irene Oboavwoduo | 57.8* | 27.0* | 77.2* |
| Harissoum Coulibaly | 48.9 | 52.0* | 56.0 |
| Fatmata Janneh | 52.8 | 35.0 | 84.8 |
| Kaylene Smikle | 52.7 | 36.7 | 83.4 |
| Shaelyn Steele | 38.1 | 11.5 | 76.0 |
| Jada Eads | 44.2 | 31.4 | 79.0 |
| Aaliyah Moore | 53.5 | N/A | 72.4 |
| Kennedy Fauntleroy | 48.0 | 32.8 | 73.5 |
| Riley Makalusky | 47.5 | 45.2 | 81.8 |
* = very small or non-college sample, so treat with extra caution.
Bottom line: even using the conservative low-end version of the Caldwell bump, this does not look like a roster that should be projected to shoot worse because of the system. The safer read is that the system has generally raised 2P efficiency, given a modest lift to 3P percentage, and produced mixed-but-slightly-positive FT results.

