WillisWG
I don't like radicals left or right!
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2006
- Messages
- 23,653
- Likes
- 57,755
Many programs are bridging the gap by arranging "above-the-cap" payments to players -- ostensibly endorsement deals between players and boosters or other "associated entities" that function in reality as extra payroll dollars.
Some schools have relied on marketing partners such as Playfly and apparel companies such as Nike or Adidas for some of their above-the-cap payments. Nebraska, for example, revamped its contract with Playfly last December in a deal that would send less money directly to the school if Playfly promised to invest millions of dollars into NIL opportunities for Cornhuskers athletes.
One of the CSC's main functions is to evaluate deals between athletes and any associated entity of their school to decide if they are legitimate endorsement opportunities. In the first case testing that power, an arbitrator ruled that the new enforcement group had appropriately applied the rules and that the Nebraska contracts were "warehousing" deals -- a prohibited type of payment in which a company purchases the rights to use the player's likeness in the future but doesn't provide specific information about how it intends to use those rights.
