dduncan4163
Have at it Hoss
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2006
- Messages
- 24,285
- Likes
- 55,064
Heupel won't name a QB until close to opening day but what those guys were discussing is media chatter, not fan speculation, that G-Mac was performing below expectations.Based on what? I don’t recall spring ending with FB being named the starter or being noticeably better than GM. Since spring concluded what would be the basis for him being awarded the job other than just media/fan speculation? I suspect we will enter fall camp with a QB competition, the starter being named at the earliest 2 weeks before the first game.
Those guys have to make a living, too. All they're really doing is reporting hearsay from anonymous source(s) that are said to be in a position to know. Nobody will remember it if they turn out to be wrong. And if anyone does, they'll just say they were reporting what they were told. It's weak journalism, IMO.Chris Low and Trey Wallace don't seem like guys who would just throw that out, but I sure wouldn't have thought Faizon would have it all but wrapped up before summer starts.
Praytell, what's "strong journalism" to you? Scheduling an interview for Heupel to tell them exactly nothing about the QB situation, which is what will happen if they do?Those guys have to make a living, too. All they're really doing is reporting hearsay from anonymous source(s) that are said to be in a position to know. Nobody will remember it if they turn out to be wrong. And if anyone does, they'll just say they were reporting what they were told. It's weak journalism, IMO.
The only thing outlawed on VN is thread titles with only a players nameI thought we outlawed off season speculation on starting QB's? IMO...in late May it way too early to know who will start at QB. If i'm being judgement day honest...both QB's will get serious playing time. I know...two QB's rotating then you have zero starting QB's...but its been done (occasionally successfully) by really good programs before. Otherwise...we have no clue yet. JMO
I see what you're saying and I share your cynicism. However, I do think an interview with someone associated with the team (the head coach, using your example) is better journalism than a rumor from an anonymous source. But that's just my crazy ol' opinion!Praytell, what's "strong journalism" to you? Scheduling an interview for Heupel to tell them exactly nothing about the QB situation, which is what will happen if they do?
What could a journalist POSSIBLY do other than be a mouthpiece for whatever the school officially releases if they don't have anonymous sources?
They’ve never been above spreading sourceless rumors. If you can’t report the source, then it isn’t coming from the horse’s mouth - which means it is subjective to change and no one would be going back on their word in doing so.Those guys have to make a living, too. All they're really doing is reporting hearsay from anonymous source(s) that are said to be in a position to know. Nobody will remember it if they turn out to be wrong. And if anyone does, they'll just say they were reporting what they were told. It's weak journalism, IMO.
If you ask me, true journalism is firsthand witness and sources who agree to go on the record. Anything else may as well be fantasy.Praytell, what's "strong journalism" to you? Scheduling an interview for Heupel to tell them exactly nothing about the QB situation, which is what will happen if they do?
What could a journalist POSSIBLY do other than be a mouthpiece for whatever the school officially releases if they don't have anonymous sources?
That's called being a mouthpiece for "The Man" or program or whoever. Why read on the news what the school or government or corporation releases? There's no need for the First Amendment if all you expect from a journalist is to read what they're told by "The Man" they can say.If you ask me, true journalism is firsthand witness and sources who agree to go on the record. Anything else may as well be fantasy.
I agree. But this is football. And as we have seen in the past, "getting hurt" is one play away. Just based upon what I read, what I hear, and what I feel, I hope Faizon Brandon proves to be solid gold. Or if George MacIntyre takes the field? I hope HE is solid gold. Hell it might be Ryan Staub. I will be surprised, but not shocked if they put in Mason Phillips. But no matter who is the starter? You are one bad play away from asking "Who's next". And then whoever the answer is? He will then be one MORE bad play away.Unless he gets hurt Faizon will be the starter
