Something similar happened in '89. UT beat Auburn. Bama beat UT. Auburn beat Bama.What happens if this happens;
We go 11-1, loss to UGA
Bama, 1 loss, to VOLS
Texas, 1 loss, to UGA
UGA, 1 loss, to Bama
This is CRAZY! Who would go the SECCG and how would all 4 teams be seeded in the playoffs?
That would get us to #3! So you're saying we have to route for everyone we play to win all the rest of their games! Crazytown!In the event of a tie between teams competing for a place in the Conference championship game, the following procedures will be used in descending order until the tie is broken:
1.Head-to-head competition among the tied teams
2.Record versus all common Conference opponents among the tied teams
3.Record against highest (best) placed common Conference opponent in the Conference standings, and proceeding through the Conference standings among the tied teams
4.Cumulative Conference winning percentage of all Conference opponents among the tied teams
5.Capped relative total scoring margin versus all Conference opponents among the tied teams
6.Random draw of the tied teams
It happened more recently than that, with georgia florida and ut all beating each other and tying for the sec east.Something similar happened in '89. UT beat Auburn. Bama beat UT. Auburn beat Bama.
It was a bit more cut & dry as the team that hadn't been to the Sugar Bowl the longest got the nod. In that case it was Bama even though all 3 "won" the SEC.
That scenario guarantees the one loss teams are playoff bound. The loser of the SEC Champ game could be left out, a la GA last season.
Exactly. 1-4 are conf champions and then a G5 school.That scenario guarantees the one loss teams are playoff bound. The loser of the SEC Champ game could be left out, a la GA last season.
The loser of the SEC championship game is definitely in a 12 team playoff.That scenario guarantees the one loss teams are playoff bound. The loser of the SEC Champ game could be left out, a la GA last season.
They haven’t used rankings as a tiebreaker since the CFP rankings began in 2014. And really, they’ll never use rankings as a tiebreaker anymore since they (correctly) realized that would also be using these teams’ out of conference games (and in some cases, how those teams did in another conference) to determine an in-conference champion.Top 2 ranked, perhaps?
For the scenario in the OP, I think it gets decided by number 4. UGA would likely be number 1 and Bama number 2 based on the strength of each teams conference schedule.In the event of a tie between teams competing for a place in the Conference championship game, the following procedures will be used in descending order until the tie is broken:
1.Head-to-head competition among the tied teams
2.Record versus all common Conference opponents among the tied teams
3.Record against highest (best) placed common Conference opponent in the Conference standings, and proceeding through the Conference standings among the tied teams
4.Cumulative Conference winning percentage of all Conference opponents among the tied teams
5.Capped relative total scoring margin versus all Conference opponents among the tied teams
6.Random draw of the tied teams
The loser of the SEC championship game is definitely in a 12 team playoff.
I still think the loser of the SEC CG is screwed. Because they have to play that game and they don’t earn a bye in the playoff. The 3rd place SEC team is much better off. Because the championship game week becomes essentially a bye.
I'm not sure but I think they go by the scores. If that is correct, we may regret going conservative on Okl.What happens if this happens;
We go 11-1, loss to UGA
Bama, 1 loss, to VOLS
Texas, 1 loss, to UGA
UGA, 1 loss, to Bama
This is CRAZY! Who would go the SECCG and how would all 4 teams be seeded in the playoffs?
I think Post 3 is correct.What happens if this happens;
We go 11-1, loss to UGA
Bama, 1 loss, to VOLS
Texas, 1 loss, to UGA
UGA, 1 loss, to Bama
This is CRAZY! Who would go the SECCG and how would all 4 teams be seeded in the playoffs?
It'll never happen because of money, but They should just eliminate the conference championship games with they new expanded playoff. For some teams playing in it, it won't be worth the risk.The loser of the SEC championship game is definitely in a 12 team playoff.
I still think the loser of the SEC CG is screwed. Because they have to play that game and they don’t earn a bye in the playoff. The 3rd place SEC team is much better off. Because the championship game week becomes essentially a bye.
Hmm, wouldn't Texas be knocked out first, though, by rule 1? "Head-to-head competition among the tied teams"For the scenario in the OP, I think it gets decided by number 4. UGA would likely be number 1 and Bama number 2 based on the strength of each teams conference schedule.