Those assembled cited various Bush actions or policies, including "lies that led the U.S. into war."
They also said that Bush--Cheney policies precipitated torture, illegal spying on American citizens, and the curtailment of privacy and civil rights in the name of fighting terrorism.
Clinton's "lies", which he never should have faced impeachemnt for, were made under oath. The concept that people support impeachment for essentially disagreements with policy shows me that a substantial portion of this country is totally ignorant to the underlying precepts of representative democracy.
the case should never have gotten to the point of a grand jury once it veered away from the Whitewater affair. Since it did get there and he did lie to the grand jury, we needed to publicly display the fact that the government, even the king, is accountable to the law. The whole impeachment process was for show, because there was no prayer of getting through the senate.Clinton's "lies", which he never should have faced impeachemnt for, were made under oath. The concept that people support impeachment for essentially disagreements with policy shows me that a substantial portion of this country is totally ignorant to the underlying precepts of representative democracy.
The scope of executive privilege is very nebulous. Its limits, if there are in fact limits, are poorly defined. Essentially, it becomes a case by case review of whether or not privilege is applicable. The Bush Administration's extremely broad interpretation of what is privileged will likely lead to some court decisions that will more specifically define the parameters.