4th timeout

[B81]

Did the sec comment on the 4th timeout they gave OU in the second half?

They were charged a time out to avoid a ten second run off due to a review, and then used 3 on the final drive while we were killing the clock.

 

[Volador]

I hate time outs

 

[Switch 625]

 

[KoachKrab127]

There were quite a few questionable calls, but that one was just a downright blunder.

 

[tnburban]

Hmmm....

 

[TennesseeTarheel]

Just introducing them to SEC officiating.

 

[tennesseeduke]

Did the sec comment on the 4th timeout they gave OU in the second half?

They were charged a time out to avoid a ten second run off due to a review, and then used 3 on the final drive while we were killing the clock.

I was curious if anyone else caught that!

 

[Orangeslide]

They definitely gave an extra time out. I heard the white hat say to avoid the 10 second run off OU would be charged a time out.

 

[Thunder Good-Oil]

Oklahoma wasn’t charged a time out at 01:18. The ref made an incorrect announcement about them taking one to avoid a 10 second run off. They didn’t. The officials initiated the review as it was under 2:00 remaining. The clock started running before the snap after the overturned touchdown ruling. The refs got it right OK’s time out count right.

 

[DaddyChad]

Oklahoma wasn’t charged a time out at 01:18. The ref made an incorrect announcement about them taking one to avoid a 10 second run off. They didn’t. The officials initiated the review as it was under 2:00 remaining. The clock started running before the snap after the overturned touchdown ruling. The refs got it right.

Well at least they got one thing right.

 

[Thunder Good-Oil]

Well at least they got one thing right.

There needs to be a rule to run some time under that scenario. Had the refs not called it a touchdown initially then Oklahoma wouldn’t have had an opportunity to (1) unpile the scrum, (2) have the refs spot the ball, (3) lineup the offense, and (4) snap the ball with only a fraction of a second running off of the clock. So TN got screwed by the refs by initially ruling a touchdown.

 

[B81]

There needs to be a rule to run some time under that scenario. Had the refs not called it a touchdown initially then Oklahoma wouldn’t have had an opportunity to (1) unpile the scrum, (2) have the refs spot the ball, (3) lineup the offense, and (4) snap the ball with only a fraction of a second running off of the clock. So TN got screwed by the refs by initially ruling a touchdown.

There is a rule. The refs got it right, but forgot to actually charge them the time out.

The rule states that if the play would have resulted in a running clock, then there is a 10 second run off. All reviews under two minutes are from the booth as the coach can not challenge.

They messed this up bad. It ended up not mattering, but it could have been a big problem.

 

[B81]

Oklahoma wasn’t charged a time out at 01:18. The ref made an incorrect announcement about them taking one to avoid a 10 second run off. They didn’t. The officials initiated the review as it was under 2:00 remaining. The clock started running before the snap after the overturned touchdown ruling. The refs got it right.

This is not accurate.

 

[S.C. OrangeMan]

Oklahoma wasn’t charged a time out at 01:18. The ref made an incorrect announcement about them taking one to avoid a 10 second run off. They didn’t. The officials initiated the review as it was under 2:00 remaining. The clock started running before the snap after the overturned touchdown ruling. The refs got it right.

Correct. The refs fixed their own mistake...for once.

 

[S.C. OrangeMan]

This is not accurate.

It is 100% accurate.

 

[WillisWG]

Hmmm....


View attachment 680890

 

[Thunder Good-Oil]

This is not accurate.

The 10-second run off rule comes into play after a penalty, an injury, or a helmet coming off. There isn’t a rule to run off 10 seconds when refs make a wrong call and reverse it after it’s reviewed.

Oklahoma benefited by being lined up and ready to snap the ball immediately after the refs blew the whistle to start the clock.

 

[B81]

It is 100% accurate.

Here is the rule. I am right you are wrong na na nabooboo

 

[Thunder Good-Oil]

Here is the rule. I am right you are wrong na na nabooboo

You’re right. The refs should have taken the clock from 1:18 to 1:08 and started the game clock. They did start the clock, so they counted OK’s use of time outs correctly. Last year the 10-second run off came into play in the last minute. This year it’s the last 2 minutes.

4 refs got together at the spot before starting to run the clock and were discussing something.

NCAA Publications - 2024 NCAA Football Rules Book - ONLINE ONLY

 

[Thunder Good-Oil]

A mistake by Heupel’s staff for not demanding the 10-second run off.

 

[reecetn]

Who needs timeouts against UT's offense. Fake injuries work better.

 

[esarmstrong]

Who needs timeouts against UT's offense. Fake injuries work better.

They also work good on extra points when your team scores too quick for the defense to rest.

 

[lukeneyland]

OU did another ******** injury to stop the clock

 

[Boca Vol]

When the ref announced the review there was also a UT player down with an injury. That's why there was no run-off. The ref even announced it.