ACC approves grant of media rights through 2026-2027

#1

TrueOrange

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2008
Messages
52,011
Likes
7,266
#1
Think what the Big 12 did with its third tier rights only longer term, if I understand this correctly.

ACC media-rights deal to lock in schools OK'd by presidents - ESPN

The Atlantic Coast Conference presidents approved Monday a grant of media rights for the league through 2026-27, effectively halting the exodus of any schools to other conferences.

The move solidifies the future of the ACC, which had several teams that had been speculated as targets of the Big Ten.

The ACC's grant of rights makes it untenable financially for a school to leave, guaranteeing in the 14 years of the deal that a school's media rights, including revenue, for all home games would remain with the ACC regardless of the school's affiliation.

"This announcement further highlights the continued solidarity and commitment by our member institutions," said ACC commissioner John Swofford said in a statement. "The Council of Presidents has shown tremendous leadership in insuring the ACC is extremely well positioned with unlimited potential."

The ACC becomes the fourth league with a grant of rights, along with the Big Ten, Pac-12 and Big 12. The SEC is the only conference among the Power Five leagues that does not have a grant of rights.

"It was pretty cut and dry to unify this league," another ACC source said. "The ACC has been a really good league and now it can become really special."

Last year when the ACC increased its exit fee from $20 million to three times its annual operating budget -- about $52 million -- Maryland and Florida State voted against the increase.

Maryland leaves for the Big Ten in 2014 and has filed a lawsuit, claiming it shouldn't be responsible for the new exit fee. The ACC also filed a lawsuit against Maryland, guaranteeing the Terps pay the full amount.

As far the grant of rights, "Florida State is on board," a source said.

Multiple ACC schools have been speculated as targets for the Big Ten, if that league decided to expand to 16 schools.

With the grant of rights in place at three other power leagues, if the Big Ten wants to add more schools it would have to target schools from leagues that don't have a grant of rights -- the SEC, the American Athletic Conference (formerly Big East), Mid-American, Conference USA, Mountain West, Sun Belt -- or BYU.

On July 1, Pittsburgh and Syracuse join as full ACC members while Notre Dame joins in all sports but football. In 2014, Louisville joins the ACC as a full member.

"People are always speculating about teams leaving the league, but no one has wavered," a source said. "This (the grant of rights) is a good move. A proactive move."

The grant of rights coincides with the ACC's TV deal with ESPN through the 2026-27 season. That deal was worth $17 million per school per year, but sources told ESPN last year it is expected to increase to at least $18 million per school per year with the addition of Notre Dame.
 
#2
#2
Some blog analysis on it

ACC Grant Of Rights Deal Could End Realignment Madness For A While

Now here’s something unexpected…

David Glenn of WCMC-FM in Raleigh — that’s not him at left — is reporting today that the schools of the ACC will soon announce a “unanimous 15 school agreement extending” a grant of media rights to the league office. If/when such a move occurs, it will likely serve as an emergency brake for the runaway train known as conference realignment.

According to Glenn, who is also the publisher of the ACC Sports Journal at ACCSports.com, the deal is expected to run through the conclusion of the current ACC/ESPN television contract in 2027.

ESPN’s Brett McMurphy has confirmed the report through his own ACC sources and David Teel of The Daily Press in Hampton Roads, Virginia has reported that the GOR was distributed to ACC schools three to four weeks ago for their review.

So what does this mean?



* It means John Swofford has solidified his Atlantic Coast Conference. That was a Herculean task with Jim Delany and the Big Ten bearing down on his league. Kudos to the ACC commish.

* It means that any school attempting to leave the ACC prior to 2027 would have to forfeit its rights (ie: television money) back to the ACC regardless of what league it wound up in. Not only would the school lose millions upon millions of dollars, but any league looking to add an ACC school would — theoretically — see no real financial reward from bringing in said school.

* It means the Big Ten, Big XII and SEC won’t be making raids for schools such as Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia Tech, Duke, NC State, Virginia Tech, Clemson, Florida State, or Miami as many had expected and some had hoped.



And before you start wondering, there are already reports that the ACC plans to stand pat at 15 schools (14 full members plus Notre Dame).

Ironically, the last major conference without an official grant of rights deal is the SEC, though with the league buying back most of its schools’ third-tier media rights and rolling them into the league’s new deal with ESPN, it might as well have such a document. Also, while the Big XII might eye Arkansas or the Big Ten might consider Kentucky or Vanderbilt or finally Missouri, there’s really very little chance of any SEC school leaving. As Mike Slive is fond of pointing out, the SEC has no exit fee (because no one would ever want out).

So if the Big Ten truly wants to grow into a 16-school league, UConn and Cincinnati remain available.

If the Big XII wants to expand past 10 schools, BYU, Cincinnati, UConn, or other smaller Midwestern/Western schools (such as Boise State) would appear to be the best bets.

For the SEC, it looks as though the league will remain a 14-school league after all, which is exactly what multiple SEC sources have told us the conference was hoping for lo these many turbulent months. If the ACC’s grant of rights agreement comes about and it is as ironclad as most lawyers believe these types of agreements to be, any SEC move into Virginia or North Carolina won’t occur on Slive’s watch.

And for the average college sports fan who was just praying for an end to the expansion/realignment madness, this shocker of a move should serve as a belated Christmas present.

Big news.

ACC presidents approve grant of rights - ACC Blog - ESPN

The ACC Council of Presidents announced Monday that each of the current and future 15-member institutions has signed a grant of media rights, effective immediately.

ESPN’s Brett McMurphy reports the grant of media rights would run through the 2026-27 season.

The move essentially solidifies the future of the ACC, which has been the subject of rampant speculation regarding member schools as targets for other leagues in future conference realignment.

The grant of rights guarantees if a school leaves for another league in the 14-year window, that school’s media rights -- including revenue -- for all home games would remain with the ACC and not its new conference.

"That ends expansion right there," a source told McMurphy.

The David Glenn Show first reported the ACC was considering the grant of rights.

ACC commissioner John Swofford said in a statement: "This announcement further highlights the continued solidarity and commitment by our member institutions. The Council of Presidents has shown tremendous leadership in insuring the ACC is extremely well positioned with unlimited potential."

The Council of Presidents also released a statement reading: "The ACC has long been a leader in intercollegiate athletics, both academically and athletically. Collectively, we all agree the grant of rights further positions the ACC and its current and future member schools as one of the nation's premier conferences."

Pitt and Syracuse are set to enter the league for the 2013 season, along with Notre Dame in all sports but football. Louisville is set to join in 2014, when Maryland moves to the Big Ten.
 
#3
#3
I just briefly perused your excerpts, but if this is what I'm thinking it is, we might be waiting a little longer than expected on that so-called "super conference." Thanks for the intel!
 
#4
#4
Awesome news. This stuff was confusing. and LOL @ anyone eyeing Kentucky or Arkansas.
 
#5
#5
Awesome news. This stuff was confusing. and LOL @ anyone eyeing Kentucky or Arkansas.

I don't know if this is what you were going for or not, but anyone thinking they were going to raid the SEC is just stupid. I think that part was just thrown in there simply because the SEC doesn't "officially" have such an agreement like the others apparently do.
 
#6
#6
Have to admit, I'm a little baffled this thread isn't getting more play, but the "NCAA" forum has always been one of intervals of high and low volume. Must just be a low volume kind of day. Should pick up.
 
#7
#7
Wow, huge news for the ACC, which is in my opinion, the second most entertaining conference to watch.

It'd be great if Florida State keeps getting better, Miami returns to some form of its previous self, and a couple of other teams join Virginia Tech and Clemson as new big time programs.
 
#8
#8
For the SEC, it looks as though the league will remain a 14-school league after all, which is exactly what multiple SEC sources have told us the conference was hoping for lo these many turbulent months.

???

I don't get what this is supposed to mean. Why has the conference been hoping for what it already has?
 
#10
#10
???

I don't get what this is supposed to mean. Why has the conference been hoping for what it already has?

I presume it's supposed to mean that those in the conference were hoping that they'd get more time to try to acclimate to / digest the two fairly new additions (adjust to scheduling changes, etc, that came with Missouri and A&M) rather than, acting responsively to a massive shift or shifts in conference alignments, have to / be force to take on more additions so soon (relative to the last ones)
 
#11
#11
Gotta admit, I'm not pleased by this. 16 teams is actually more workable than 14.

Isn't 14 workable enough if the conference just agrees to go to 9 conference games a year, like pretty much all the other major conferences will be doing?
 
#12
#12
Another write-up, from SI...probably the last on I'll post

ACC Grant of Rights will end college football conference realignment - College Football - Stewart Mandel - SI.com

Rejoice! ACC Grant of Rights should halt conference realignment

I don't want to jinx it. And I've certainly been wrong on this matter before. But after nearly three years of endless silliness and shuffling, it appears major conference realignment may be over for the foreseeable future.

Really.

The ACC announced Monday that its presidents have signed a Grant of Rights agreement through 2026-27. That means the conference now owns its 15 current and future members' television rights for the duration of that period, effectively blocking those schools from joining another conference (because what conference would add a school if it can't cash in on its television revenue)? The Big 12's own six-year Grant of Rights agreement reached in October 2011 (and since extended through 2025) greatly stabilized that then-tenuous conference, allowing it to add TCU and West Virginia and ink an eventual long-term deal with ESPN and FOX.

While there had been little talk recently of any further realignment among the power conferences, both fans and industry insiders felt another move would come soon enough -- and nearly all speculation centered around ACC schools.

First, the Big 12 supposedly wanted Florida State and Clemson (not true). Then, the Big Ten wanted to continue its eastern push by adding North Carolina, Virginia or (insert message-board speculation subject here), but was waiting to see how Maryland's pending lawsuit over the ACC's $50 million exit fee played out. Even last fall's addition of Notre Dame as a partial member (the Irish will play five ACC teams each football season beginning next year) did not seem to dampen the perception that the ACC was vulnerable in the wake of a television deal that's slightly less filthy-rich ($17 million annually per school) than the Big Ten, SEC, Big 12 or Pac-12 deals, which all net at least $20 million per year per school.

But Monday's news, which reportedly coincides with planning for a possible ACC Network that could help push teams' annual revenue to that $20-million mark or beyond, puts the ACC on the same stable ground as its competitors. Remarkably, of the five aforementioned leagues, only the SEC does not have a Grant of Rights agreement. (The SEC does not even have exit fees. It's not too worried about teams leaving.) While a school that really wants to leave could theoretically test the contract in a court of law, the downside of losing with a Grant of Rights in place would be infinitely costlier than a $50 million exit fee. Hence, this is a pretty big deal.

Now, if you're one of the people who simply can't get enough conference shuffling and can't fathom the end of expansion speculation, you're left holding out hope for one of these less exciting scenarios:

• The ACC, now in a more comfortable spot and eyeing more inventory for a possible conference channel, adds one or two more schools to get to 16 in football and 16 or 17 in basketball. Connecticut and Cincinnati fans eager to ditch what's become the American Athletic Conference (the old Big East) are certainly holding out for this. To this point, however, the ACC has only been interested in those schools as backups in the event that it suffered more defections.

• The Big 12, no longer satisfied with having 10 members, gives BYU and perhaps Boise State another look. However, as hard as it for many to believe, Big 12 leaders have repeatedly insisted that they're happy with 10 and only planned to consider expansion if the other conferences got even bigger, which now seems unlikely. There are no other candidates that would be guaranteed to increase the league's per-team take.

• Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany, undeterred in his quest for East Coast domination, adds Connecticut and maybe Cincinnati. Granted, never in a million years did I think he'd take on financial disasters Rutgers and Maryland, but never in a billion years do I think he'll add two schools with 40,000-seat stadiums in television markets the Big Ten already mostly claims.

It really could be over. Can you believe it?

For all the doomsday predictions, the ACC is once again sitting comfortably. While still lagging in terms of overall on-the-field football quality, it certainly improved itself by adding Louisville, and its basketball league will be a monster. Its members will have plenty of TV money and exposure.

Interestingly, the very conference that's caused much of the chaos over the past decade (twice decimating the Big East, despite no direct threat in either instance) may be the same one that now cements some long-term calm.

If in fact this is the end of movement at the top, let it be noted that things ended with an appropriately clunky result. After three years of impetuous moves made primarily by university presidents who have little grasp of athletics, we're looking at possibly 12-15 years in which three of the five most powerful conferences will be stuck at 14 teams. Twelve is a logical number. Sixteen, while unwieldy, at least provides for symmetry. But as the SEC began to learn last year, 14 is an unnatural number that leads to scheduling headaches and imbalances.

Of course that's how this whole thing would end. But mercifully it's ending, and that's the most important thing.
 
#13
#13
Gotta admit, I'm not pleased by this. 16 teams is actually more workable than 14.

From a traditional fan/rivalry standpoint, I have no urge to make the conference bigger. Heck, we should have just stayed at 12.

But given the new NCAA landscape, and given the money tied to TV, one can make a good case for expanding to 16, with new markets in North Carolina and Virginia.

Which is why that quote about hoping to stay at 14 doesn't make any sense to me.
 
#15
#15
florida state is pissed.

the members of the acc just committed to permanent second tier status and they don't even know it
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#16
#16
9 games is a must at 14. I would have prefered 8 games at 16.

Screw that. 7. Say the SEC goes to 16. Why should Tennessee have their game against Alabama count every year while Ole Miss gets one against Vandy every year? Or whoever is locked in with Kentucky?
 
#18
#18
I'm saying that it's kind of a crock that we've got 8 games in the SEC, two of which are non-divisional, yet everybody's counts the same.

Say team A in the west has to play Florida and Georgia in cross divisional games, while team B gets Vanderbilt and Kentucky. Yet those games count equally in the standings.

I'm saying that the SEC (and conferences in general) need to start using interdivisional records to determine who plays in title games. Otherwise, whoever lucks out with cross-divisional draws is going to have a massive inside edge.
 
#19
#19
I'm saying that it's kind of a crock that we've got 8 games in the SEC, two of which are non-divisional, yet everybody's counts the same.

Say team A in the west has to play Florida and Georgia in cross divisional games, while team B gets Vanderbilt and Kentucky. Yet those games count equally in the standings.

I'm saying that the SEC (and conferences in general) need to start using interdivisional records to determine who plays in title games. Otherwise, whoever lucks out with cross-divisional draws is going to have a massive inside edge.

But that's cyclical. Bama has an easy cross-division draw this year, but LSU will get UK in a couple of years. If inter-division games shouldn't count, they shouldn't be played.
 
#20
#20
So what if it's cyclical? College football can change drastically from season to season. The only way to look at it is on a season by season basis. As it is, the SEC sends teams to the title game when 25% of the games on the schedule can be drastically different.

And how does what I said lead to saying that cross division games shouldn't be played? Everybody plays non conference games that don't count for anything towards conference title games either, yet they are still played. Bama and UT can still play every year, and UGA and Auburn, etc. but it makes absolutely no sense that those games count towards divisional standings.
 
#21
#21
So what if it's cyclical? College football can change drastically from season to season. The only way to look at it is on a season by season basis. As it is, the SEC sends teams to the title game when 25% of the games on the schedule can be drastically different.

And how does what I said lead to saying that cross division games shouldn't be played? Everybody plays non conference games that don't count for anything towards conference title games either, yet they are still played. Bama and UT can still play every year, and UGA and Auburn, etc. but it makes absolutely no sense that those games count towards divisional standings.

If you play a game that does not count toward your conference record, how can you be in a conference with that team? It's like the sound of one hand clapping.
 
#23
#23
If you play a game that does not count toward your conference record, how can you be in a conference with that team? It's like the sound of one hand clapping.

Those games still contribute to bcs rankings and can be played for historical/rivalry purposes.

But it's utterly silly to have them count towards divisional standings.
 
#24
#24
I'm saying that it's kind of a crock that we've got 8 games in the SEC, two of which are non-divisional, yet everybody's counts the same.

Say team A in the west has to play Florida and Georgia in cross divisional games, while team B gets Vanderbilt and Kentucky. Yet those games count equally in the standings.

I'm saying that the SEC (and conferences in general) need to start using interdivisional records to determine who plays in title games. Otherwise, whoever lucks out with cross-divisional draws is going to have a massive inside edge.

I'd be careful what I wish for.

Florida is 93-13 inside the division since 1992.
 
Last edited:
#25
#25
When the conference championship format cannot guarantee that the two best teams in that conference will play each other each time, that is a substantial loss of credibility. How could any CCG fully qualify as a true semi-final game. Conference championship games are often nothing more then tits on a bull.
 

VN Store



Back
Top