Al Gore goes on tirade at the Aspen Institute of Technology

#2
#2
I'd be as passionate as Al about the subject if I stood to make as much money off of it.
 
#7
#7
On the one hand Gore is bat**** crazy.

Gore Unhinged! Loses it on skeptical claims: 'It may be volcanoes.' ********! 'It may be sun spots.' ********! 'It's not getting warmer.' ********!' -- Climate Depot Responds! | Climate Depot

Former Vice President Al Gore sounded a defeated tone and lamented the utter failure of the man-made global warming movement during a speech to the Aspen Institute in Colorado on August 4, 2011. Gore used multiple curse words in an emotional speech that revealed his deep frustration and all but conceded defeat to global warming skeptics.

Defeated Gore unleashes: 'It's no longer acceptable in mixed company, meaning bipartisan company, to use the damn word 'climate'...we cannot possibly come to an agreement on it' economically.

Gore Unhinged! Loses it on skeptical claims: 'They pay pseudo-scientists to pretend to be scientists to put out the message: 'This climate thing, it's nonsense. Man-made CO2 doesn't trap heat. It may be volcanoes.' Bull****! 'It may be sun spots.' Bull****! 'It's not getting warmer.' Bull****!” Gore exclaimed'

Gore also compared today's global warming skeptics to the "evil, evil, evil" tobacco promotion campaigns of decades ago.

Climate Depot's Point-By-Point Rebuttal to Gore's Highbrow Scientific Arguments:

Gore Claim: 'It may be volcanoes.' Bull****!'

Reality Check: Gore has not been keeping up on the latest data and peer-reviewed studies. Yes, volcanoes can and do have a big impact on global warming. See:

Flashback 2008 Study: 'Lack of observed [volcanic] dust in atmosphere could be responsible for as much as .18 to .36 degrees F rise (about 1/3rd) in avg. temp since the 1960s' -- 'Earth's atmosphere is comparatively free of volcanic dust, and that relatively large amounts of sunlight are being refracted through the Earth's atmosphere'

New study in PNAS suggests that the volcanic impact on climate may be significantly underestimated

New NASA paper in peer-reviewed Geophysical Research Letters contradicts Kaufmann et al saying it's volcanoes, not China coal: 'Observed trend is mainly driven by a series of moderate but increasingly intense volcanic eruptions'

Gore Claim: 'It may be sun spots.' Bull****!'

Reality Check: Gore simply is trapped in the Co2 or bust mode of thinking. See:

2009 Peer-Reviewed Study: 'Sunspot cycle has a big effect on the earth's weather'

Latest 2010 Peer-Research: Solar/Cosmic Rays Combo Is Driving Climate Change, Not Human CO2 Emissions

Indian study shows climate change is probably caused by natural factors: 'Most of the observed temperature fluctuations could be attributed to cosmic rays'

Flashback Sept. 2009: 'Sun Sleeps': Danish Solar Scientist Svensmark declares 'global warming has stopped and a cooling is beginning...enjoy global warming while it lasts' -- Svensmark called it 2 years ago! Sun is 'heading towards 'a grand minimum' as we saw in Little Ice Age'

Flashback: UN IPCC Global Warming Scandal: 'Consensus' on Sun is One Expert -- 'The IPCC relied on evidence supplied by just only one Solar Physicist, Judith Lean, to create their "consensus that solar influence upon the climate was minimal'

Progress! New Scientist permits the sun to join the climate club: Runs an editorial today grudgingly admitting that 'The sun's activity has a place in climate science'

Stagnating Temperatures: Climatologists Baffled by Global Warming Time-Out -- Global warming appears to have stalled. Climatologists are puzzled as to why average global temperatures have stopped rising over the last 10 years. Some attribute the trend to a lack of sunspots, while others explain it through ocean currents. – 'The fact is that the sun is weakening slightly. Its radiation activity is currently at a minimum, as evidenced by the small number of sunspots on its surface. According to calculations performed by a group of NASA scientists led by David Rind, which were recently published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, this reduced solar activity is the most important cause of stagnating global warming'

Forget Coal use in China; Warmists now claim the sun has stopped global warming!

Goodbye Sunspots?: Sun may become spotless for decades -- 'a phenomenon that in 17th century coincided with a prolonged period of cooling on Earth' -- 'Sunspots disappeared almost entirely between 1645 and 1715 during a period called the Maunder Minimum, which coincided with decades of lower-than-normal temperatures in Europe nicknamed the Little Ice Age.'

[Climate Depot note: It is not simply, the sun or Co2 when looking at global temperatures, it is the Sun, volcanoes, tilt of the Earth's axis, water vapor, methane, clouds, ocean cycles, land use, etc. Climate change is governed by hundreds of factors, or variables, not just CO2. See: UK Professor Emeritus of Biogeography Philip Stott of the University of London explains the crux of the entire global warming debate and rebuts the notion that CO2 is the main climate driver.

"As I have said, over and over again, the fundamental point has always been this: climate change is governed by hundreds of factors, or variables, and the very idea that we can manage climate change predictably by understanding and manipulating at the margins one politically-selected factor (CO2), is as misguided as it gets," Stott wrote in 2008.]

Gore Claim: 'It's not getting warmer.' Bull****!'

Reality Check: Gore may want to scream 'Bull****' as his pal, UN IPCC Chair Pachauri who has acknowledged global warming has stopped. Flashback 2008: UN IPCC Chairman Pachauri 'to look into the apparent temperature plateau so far this century'

Chinese coal blamed for global warming er... cooling: Curry 'doesn't find statistical theatrics convincing...There has been no increase in aerosols, either globally or over E. Asia, from 2000-2006'-- Prof. Judith Curry: 'The political consequence of this study seems to be that the simplest solution to global warming is for the Chinese to burn more coal, which they intend to do anyway'

A peer-reviewed admission that 'global surface temperatures did not rise between 1998 and 2008'

Shock News: Fox News inspired scientist to study why global warming has stopped! Lead researcher Robert Kaufmann 'inspired by 'skeptical' questioning from Fox News viewer -- Kaufmann: 'Two years ago, I gave a talk to a general audience in New Jersey about climate change. And an older gentleman asked me 'why should I believe in this climate change - I was watching Fox News and they said the Earth's temperature hasn't changed in 10 years and has actually gone down'. So I went back and checked the data and found that was just about right'

Physicist Dr. Lubos Motl: 'Did Chinese coal cause the cooling since 1998?' 'It still shows how incredibly shaky contemporary would-be 'mainstream' opinions about climate drivers are' -- Motl: 'Suddenly, an old Gentleman who watches Fox News is primary cause of a paper that explains away a whole decade of warming by a previously neglected mechanism...the idea that warming predictions failed because of the Chinese coal is just a random guess, one among hundreds of possible explanations...Why don't those people honestly admit that they simply have no clue what was happening since 1998 and what will be happening before 2020, 2030, or 2100?'

Oh My! 2010 tied for 'hottest' year?! Relax, it is 'purely a political statement' -- Even NASA's Hansen admits it is 'not particularly important' -- Prof. mocks 'hottest decade' claim as 'a joke' -- 'Claims based on year-to-year temperature data that differs by only a few HUNDREDTHS of a degree'

Gore Claim: "Gore recalled how not long ago tobacco giants “succeeded in delaying the implementation of the surgeon general's report for 40 years – 40 years! In every one of those 40 years the average number of Americans killed by cigarettes each year exceeded the total number of Americans killed in all of World War II: 450,000 per year. My sister was one of them. ... It was evil, evil, evil.” The model of media manipulation used then, Gore said, “was transported whole cloth into the climate debate.

Reality Check: It is climate fear promoters like Gore who mimic tobacco industry tactics. Like the tobacco industry, [Warmists'] campaigns have: 'Manufactured uncertainty and fear by stridently proclaiming certainty and consensus based on dubious and uncertain modeled results predicting disastrous consequences of a warmer climate'

Related Links:

Note: Other Dems have ran from using words climate and cap-and-trade: War is Peace: Sen. Reid: 'We don't use the word 'cap-and-trade'. That's something that's been deleted from my dictionary' -- Sen. Kerry: 'I don't know what 'cap and trade' means. I don't think the average American does. This is not a cap-and-trade bill, it's a pollution reduction bill'

Climate Depot on Gore: 'He's presiding over the greatest collapse of a modern environmental movement in history, and this is what he has now -- 24 hours to try to regenerate it and start over' -- Morano on Gore: 'He thought he was on the winning side of science and history. And now, in 2011, he raises the white flag and says basically, 'I have to start all over. We've have failed' -- 'He's morphed the movement into extreme weather because this is a much easier case for them to emotionally make...now, every time there's a hurricane, a tornado, a flood, a drought [or] a heat wave, they can just say, 'Ha, ha -- further proof of manmade global warming'

Climate Depot's Morano: 'A movement that had Al Gore – one of the most divisive political figures -– as the face of the movement, was bound to fail' -- 'A movement that utilized the scandal ridden United Nations – which is massively distrusted by the American people -- as the repository of science, was doomed to fail'

Climate Depot Comment: 'This is psychologically healthy development for Gore. He needs to face the reality that despite his film, an Oscar, a Nobel, a compliant shoddy news media despite the UN, Hollywood, untold tens of billions of dollars spent, propaganda directed at school kids, and twisted science - the movement Gore helped found, is dying scientifically, politically and economically.

It is time to celebrate the utter and complete failure of the sub-prime science of man-made global warming.'



OTOH he is a highly successful modern day Goebels.

Aimed at students in grades 5 through 8, it helps
teachers explain how so-called "greenhouse gases"
warm our planet Earth.

Astro-Venture: Astro-Venture Atmospheric Science Training

Lesson 3: Green house Gases: Carbon Dioxide and Water Vapor

Students explore the unique properties of greenhouse gases, which allow these gases to influence the surface temperature of a planet.

Archived-Articles: The Hidden Flaw in Greenhouse Theory

Anyone who has a student in school in grades 5 through 8 needs to read this link and refute this bullcrap being indoctrinated in their children.

Read the link and understand.

Observe how NASA describes this relationship, however.

Question: What is the relationship between light and heat?

Answer: Things that are hot sometimes give off light. Things under a light source sometimes heat up.


Utterly false.

Heated masses always emit light (infrared).

Always.

That's a direct consequence of molecules in motion. And while it's true that some substances may be transparent to infrared light, it doesn't follow that they can't be heated or, if heated, might not emit infrared. Yet NASA's misleading formulation implies precisely that.

So now NASA which was once a program devoted to exploration of space and the gaining of knowledge has been perverted into a program to indoctrinate children in false propaganda and an outreach program to the world of islam which will use any information gained to try to defeat our own society.

But a mixup like this raises a deeper question: Why does NASA go wrong? Because it has a flimsy yet lucrative theory to foist on the taxpaying public, that's why. As the space agency explains in the Main Lesson Concept, the core idea of greenhouse theory is that downward radiation from greenhouse gases raises the earth's surface temperature higher than solar heating can.
------------------------------

To make this idea seem plausible, therefore, it's crucial to fix people's attention on the 1% of the atmosphere that can be heated by radiant transfer instead of the 99% and more that is heated by direct contact with the earth's surface and then by convection. NASA is stacking the deck, you see. If they made it clear that every species of atmospheric gas gets heated mainly by conductive transfer, and that all heated bodies radiate light, then even a child could connect the dots: "Oh. So the whole atmosphere radiates heat to the earth and makes it warmer. All of the atmosphere is a greenhouse gas."

Crash, boom, there goes the theory. And there goes the abundant funding that this fear-promoting "science" attracts so well. For what CO2 and water vapor emit is miniscule compared to the buzzing multitude of heated nitrogen, oxygen, and even argon, all of it radiating infrared, too. Keep in mind that thermal radiation from this forgotten 99% has never been proposed or imagined to increase the earth's temperature, although by the theory's very tenets, it should.
-----------------------------

Accordingly, any heated gas emits infrared. There's nothing unique about CO2. Otherwise, substances like nitrogen and oxygen would truly be miracles of physics: Heat 'em as much as you wish, but they'd never radiate in response.


Yet this amounts to a double-whammy. For meteorologists acknowledge that our atmosphere is principally heated by surface contact and convective circulation. Surrounded by the vacuum of space, moreover, the earth can only dissipate this energy by radiation. On one hand, then, if surface-heated nitrogen and oxygen do not radiate the thermal energy they acquire, they rob the earth of a means of cooling off -- which makes them "greenhouse gases" by definition. On the other hand, though, if surface-heated nitrogen and oxygen do radiate infrared, then they are also "greenhouse gases," which defeats the premise that only radiation from the infrared-absorbers raises the Earth's temperature.

Either way, therefore, the convoluted theory we've been going by is wrong.
 
#8
#8
I have addressed almost every one of the distortions above, but wanted to hit the new one:

infrared is longwave radiation, not light.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#9
#9
al-gore-superhero.jpg
 
#12
#12
Al probably has some discounted carbon credits he could sell you.

He would probably even sell you the whole carbon exchange since it is now defunct.



IPorange
I have addressed almost every one of the distortions above, but wanted to hit the new one:

infrared is longwave radiation, not light.

Try addressing even one of the so-called distortions again.

And I have addressed all of yours as well, including all of Al Gore's nutcase talking points.

All light is radiation somewhere on the spectrum.

Infrared Waves

Infrared light lies between the visible and microwave portions of the electromagnetic spectrum.

Infrared light has a range of wavelengths, just like visible light has wavelengths that range from red light to violet. "Near infrared" light is closest in wavelength to visible light and "far infrared" is closer to the microwave region of the electromagnetic spectrum. The longer, far infrared wavelengths are about the size of a pin head and the shorter, near infrared ones are the size of cells, or are microscopic.

Far infrared waves are thermal. In other words, we experience this type of infrared radiation every day in the form of heat! The heat that we feel from sunlight, a fire, a radiator or a warm sidewalk is infrared. The temperature-sensitive nerve endings in our skin can detect the difference between inside body temperature and outside skin temperature
-------------------------

Humans may not be able to see infrared light, but did you know that snakes in the pit viper family, like rattlesnakes, have sensory "pits", which are used to image infrared light? This allows the snake to detect warm blooded animals, even in dark burrows! Snakes with 2 sensory pits are even thought to have some depth perception in the infrared! (Thanks to NASA's Infrared Processing and Analysis Center for help with the text in this section.)

All you do is indulge in semantics then say global warming theory is for real.

Face the facts, the AGW theory has been thouroughly refuted using science that shows some of the most basic aspects of the theory are false.
 
#14
#14
bsiloveyou.jpg


BLOG.BILLLAWRENCEONLINE.COM: The Polar Bears Are Not Drowning

A keystone in the claim that gases produced in the production of energy are causing global warming has been shown to be laughably overblown.

Despite millions of public school children being taught it as an unquestionable truth.

The polar bears are not drowning as famously described in Al Gore's Nobel-Prize-winning, Oscar-winning film An Inconvenient Truth.

Human Events is reporting that Charles Monnett, the author of the study widely cited as establishing this as fact, has been placed on administrative leave from the U.S. Department of the Interior after serious problems were found with the earthshaking claims he made in his 2006 paper in Polar Biology regarding drowning polar bears.

It appears that Monnett's claim was based on observing from a plane four, what-appeared-to-be-dead polar bears in the Beaufort Sea after a major windstorm, and assuming that they were dead, and had died from drowning, and had died from drowning due to be unable to reach pack ice.

The paper was peer reviewed but the reviewing was done by Monnett's wife and a Canadian who is under investigation in his country regarding bias in his papers.

grondahl.jpg
 

VN Store



Back
Top