Rockytoptalker
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2011
- Messages
- 6,929
- Likes
- 3,006
I never said that. Hopefully I’m wrong, but personally speaking I would’ve rather have had Leach instead of Pruitt in the first place. It’s too late to try it now so I’m praying Pruitt comes through.Exactly. Leach in my opinion is no better than those 3. So why would you hand out millions, pay out Pruitt and others just for that
I never said that. Hopefully I’m wrong, but personally speaking I would’ve rather have had Leach instead of Pruitt in the first place. It’s too late to try it now so I’m praying Pruitt comes through.
Right now I just want to get to where we can score 36 on a Power 5 school. Then we can move to leading by 36. After that I’ll worry about whether or not we can hold that lead. Something tells me we won’t see a 36-point lead on a P5 school under Pruitt but I hope I’m wrong.I'll agree, once Pruitt loses a 36 point, 3rd quarter lead to 0-4 UCLA. In year 7.
And then Pruitt follows it up with a blowout loss to a new P5 expansion team. In year 7.
And then, after the best year in program history. Assembles the 61st ranked recruiting class. In year 7.
And has a black cloud over his entire persona for previous abusive behavior and being embarrassingly odd.
When Pruitt accomplishes all of that, I'll be able to forget about his top ranked defenses, national title rings at multiple stops, and blue chip recruiting success.
Would you rather have Butchs soft boys, or Pruitt's dumb ones?Lol, we’ll at least they know how to line up.
Since 2012 he’s 52-42 at a program that was 9-40 the 4 years before he got there.
Context is important. It’s a moot point regardless.Any coach who posted a .587 winning percentage at UT would be fired well before seven years.
I have no idea if he is "better than Pruitt" but he definitely wouldn't cut it on The Hill with a .587. He'd be another name on the ex-coach list.