Allen West: Angel of Death

#1

therealUT

Rational Thought Allowed?
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
30,347
Likes
4,191
#1
My statement to the United Nations would have been, ‘The future does not belong to those who attack our Embassies and Consulates and kill our Ambassadors. The Angel of Death in the form of an American Bald Eagle will visit you and wreak havoc and destruction upon your existence

Read more: Allen West to U.N.: U.S. 'Angel of Death' - Kevin Cirilli - POLITICO.com

GS, this is your boy; nothing like trotting out one of the most sadistic parts of the Old Testament and implying that he will make sure the U.S. 'wipes the map' of its enemies' existence (is there another way that I should interpret, 'wreak havoc and destruction upon your existence'; or, does the quote that is often attributed to Ahmedinejad suffice?)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#2
#2
Thank God for Col. West.

To Romney—appoint Col. Allen West to Secretary of Defense!

West is right on...as usual
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#8
#8
We need a bald eagle and American flag smiley

Close to a bald eagle.
oldfogey.gif
 
#10
#10
GS, this is your boy; nothing like trotting out one of the most sadistic parts of the Old Testament and implying that he will make sure the U.S. 'wipes the map' of its enemies' existence (is there another way that I should interpret, 'wreak havoc and destruction upon your existence'; or, does the quote that is often attributed to Ahmedinejad suffice?)

Allen West vs Barack Obama on Embassy Attacks | FrontPage Magazine

"In his speech today to the United Nations, President Obama stated six times that the attacks across the Islamic world are attributed to a silly video. Furthermore, he refused to use the words terrorist attack in referring to what occurred in Benghazi Libya at our US Consulate on the 11th anniversary of 9-11. He continues to offer up apologies instead of defending our hard earned First Amendment right to freedom of speech and expression… When tolerance becomes a one way street it leads to cultural suicide. I shall not be tolerant of the intolerant."
(Alan West)

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam."
(Barack Hussein Obama)

Which one do you side with?

Don't tell me, I already know.

To publicly state most any Christian doctrine is to slander the so-called prophet of islam.

Leave Chritianity out of it entirely.

Look at the life of muhammed recorded in the books moslems consider holy and the perfect example for the way a man should live.

The facts:

Muhammed was a thief and robber, a murderer and a very deceptive liar and a pedophile.

If anything, muhammed was the devil personified.

But we have a president who says we should not criticize this false prophet?

Your indictment of West is very weak unreal and furthermore West's crititique of what we sadly have to refer to as our president is right on the money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#13
#13
Maybe our foreign policy should be based on a 1 for 10,000 ratio. Kill 1 American we take out 10,000 of yours, otherwise we leave you alone.

It's pretty evident every inch we give the extremists's want to take a mile, every inch we give makes the US look weaker and more vulnerable.
 
#14
#14
GS taking a big sip of that fallacy cocktail.

Stinky has been butt chugging straight tequila again.

StopBlowing****Up.jpg








Maybe our foreign policy should be based on a 1 for 10,000 ratio. Kill 1 American we take out 10,000 of yours, otherwise we leave you alone.

It's pretty evident every inch we give the extremists's want to take a mile, every inch we give makes the US look weaker and more vulnerable.

Turn Mecca into a parking lot and cover it with hog lard.

PleaseKickOurAsses.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#15
#15
Maybe our foreign policy should be based on a 1 for 10,000 ratio. Kill 1 American we take out 10,000 of yours, otherwise we leave you alone.

It's pretty evident every inch we give the extremists's want to take a mile, every inch we give makes the US look weaker and more vulnerable.

How about we just come home?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#18
#18
Maybe our foreign policy should be based on a 1 for 10,000 ratio. Kill 1 American we take out 10,000 of yours, otherwise we leave you alone.

It's pretty evident every inch we give the extremists's want to take a mile, every inch we give makes the US look weaker and more vulnerable.

How many inches have we given? Seems to me that we have been taking and doing as we please in the Middle East for the past sixty years.

Also, why arbitrarily pick 1:10,000? Almost 3,000 Americans were killed on 9/11/01, and 6,500 more have been killed in Iraq and Afghanistan. In Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Yemen, we have killed at least 126,000, 13,000, 36,000, and 600 civilians (these figures do not include the amount of "enemy militants" killed), respectively. Thus, for every American killed we have killed at least 18 of "theirs".

However, if you still want to a kill ratio of 1:10,000, enjoy supporting the decimation of 95,000,000 individuals (yes, that is 95 Million persons that you and GS are calling to be killed).

In other words, you are a sick ****.
 
#19
#19
How many inches have we given? Seems to me that we have been taking and doing as we please in the Middle East for the past sixty years.

Also, why arbitrarily pick 1:10,000? Almost 3,000 Americans were killed on 9/11/01, and 6,500 more have been killed in Iraq and Afghanistan. In Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Yemen, we have killed at least 126,000, 13,000, 36,000, and 600 civilians (these figures do not include the amount of "enemy militants" killed), respectively. Thus, for every American killed we have killed at least 18 of "theirs".

However, if you still want to a kill ratio of 1:10,000, enjoy supporting the decimation of 95,000,000 individuals (yes, that is 95 Million persons that you and GS are calling to be killed).

In other words, you are a sick ****.

Just a point of debate my friend, step back from the ledge.

I'm all for getting the heck out of the ME, let them do their own thing (can't abandon Israel). We develop our own energy, buy from friendly partners ext and quit shipping $$$ over there. BUT should this not work and we are attached again, major retribution.
 
#21
#21
Just a point of debate my friend, step back from the ledge.

I'm all for getting the heck out of the ME, let them do their own thing (can't abandon Israel). We develop our own energy, buy from friendly partners ext and quit shipping $$$ over there. BUT should this not work and we are attached again, major retribution.

Calling for the deaths of 95 million persons is not "just a point of debate"; negative, ***hole, it is the endorsement of genocide on a scale never before seen. Further, you made the statement twice, and then again here say that if some other plan does not work, we better respond with major retribution (which, you have defined as the killing of 95 million individuals).
 
#22
#22
Calling for the deaths of 95 million persons is not "just a point of debate"; negative, ***hole, it is the endorsement of genocide on a scale never before seen. Further, you made the statement twice, and then again here say that if some other plan does not work, we better respond with major retribution (which, you have defined as the killing of 95 million individuals).

Never once did I call for killing 95 million people. My point was to pull the heck out of the ME with it known that if we are attacked again there will be hell to pay.

Nothing eles has worked in that part of the world outside of colonization, they want us out so lets get out.

The 1:10,000 ratio was just a number.
 
#23
#23
Just a point of debate my friend, step back from the ledge.

I'm all for getting the heck out of the ME, let them do their own thing (can't abandon Israel). We develop our own energy, buy from friendly partners ext and quit shipping $$$ over there. BUT should this not work and we are attached again, major retribution.

Israel can take care of Israel. If we would back off, they would be much better off.
We are not the policeman of the world. It only takes one to take a look at our national debt to realize we cannot and should not continue these policies.

Its time to cut ALL foreign aid be it military or monetary and worry about America.
Free trade with all, friendship with none. We simply cannot afford it any longer.
Eisenhower warned us what would happen and we DID NOT listen.

Flame away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#24
#24
Israel can take care of Israel. If we would back off, they would be much better off.
We are not the policeman of the world. It only takes one to take a look at our national debt to realize we cannot and should not continue these policies.

Its time to cut ALL foreign aid be it military or monetary and worry about America.
Free trade with all, friendship with none. We simply cannot afford it any longer.
Eisenhower warned us what would happen and we DID NOT listen.

Flame away.

Flame away hell, thumbs up!
 
#25
#25
Allen West vs Barack Obama on Embassy Attacks | FrontPage Magazine



Which one do you side with?

Don't tell me, I already know.

To publicly state most any Christian doctrine is to slander the so-called prophet of islam.

Leave Chritianity out of it entirely.

Look at the life of muhammed recorded in the books moslems consider holy and the perfect example for the way a man should live.

The facts:

Muhammed was a thief and robber, a murderer and a very deceptive liar and a pedophile.

If anything, muhammed was the devil personified.

But we have a president who says we should not criticize this false prophet?

Your indictment of West is very weak unreal and furthermore West's crititique of what we sadly have to refer to as our president is right on the money.

1) Why do you have to make this a religious issue?

2) Why do you hate Islam so much? Misguided hate is the reason 9/11 happened in the first place. One would think that you could realize that and break the cycle.
 

VN Store



Back
Top