Ann Coulter sez ....

#1
lawgator1

lawgator1

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2005
Messages
72,745
Likes
42,922
#1
.... radiation can be good for you.

Watching her right now talking about people who lived in some Taiwanese apartment complex. O'Reilly trying to keep her in check.
 
#4
#4
I know bat shat crazy when I see it. Ann Coulter is DEFINITELY bat shat crazy.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
Last edited:
#7
#7
I wouldn't want to lay down beside her. She has 'black widow' written all over her.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#11
#11
I like how the OP cherry picked what he wanted to post. She actually had several facts to back it up including several articles from the NYT.

Starting a thread about this and only saying "Ann Coulter says radiation is good for you," is a huge reach and shows the ridiculous agenda that we all know you have. You've become a joke.
 
#13
#13
VOLinthaATL said:
I like how the OP cherry picked what he wanted to post. She actually had several facts to back it up including several articles from the NYT.

Starting a thread about this and only saying "Ann Coulter says radiation is good for you," is a huge reach and shows the ridiculous agenda that we all know you have. You've become a joke.
Click to expand...

Meh he took a page out of gsvol's playbook
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#16
#16
rmsmith said:
Meh he took a page out of gsvol's playbook
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Lol. Obviously an attack on Coulter. However, it doesn't change the fact that she is bat shat crazy.....
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#18
#18
VOLinthaATL said:
Welcome to AnnCoulter.com

Article is right on the front page. She had several professor's and scientist giving their research findings. Instead of just believing what the clown OP posts why not read it for yourself?
Click to expand...

She's wildly misrepresenting facts. The doses that those scientists she is referring to are no where near the scale we are talking about in reference to those plants.

Saying "radiation doesn't cause cancer" is as useless as saying "water doesn't cause drowning." Of course it does. Context matters.
 
#19
#19
IPorange said:
She's wildly misrepresenting facts. The doses that those scientists she is referring to are no where near the scale we are talking about in reference to those plants.

Saying "radiation doesn't cause cancer" is as useless as saying "water doesn't cause drowning." Of course it does. Context matters.
Click to expand...

Well of course at the actual plants it's going to be different...

Not sure that is what she is referring too...
 
#20
#20
VOLinthaATL said:
Well of course at the actual plants it's going to be different...

Not sure that is what she is referring too...
Click to expand...

She's trying to say that certain doses of radiation build an immunity. However, the potential amounts in the evacuation zone are well above that.
 
#21
#21
VOLatile said:
She's trying to say that certain doses of radiation build an immunity. However, the potential amounts in the evacuation zone are well above that.
Click to expand...

Okay, how far out is the evacuation zone? What kind of potential amounts are we looking at outside of that?
 
#22
#22
VOLatile said:
She's trying to say that certain doses of radiation build an immunity. However, the potential amounts in the evacuation zone are well above that.
Click to expand...

Also known as being bat shat crazy. She probably thinks that a nuclear induced mutation can result in some cool shizz like turning into The Hulk or something like that.

BAT. SHAT. CARAZY!
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#23
#23
VOLinthaATL said:
Okay, how far out is the evacuation zone? What kind of potential amounts are we looking at outside of that?
Click to expand...

29 miles radius has been evacuated and 100 miles have been recommended to stay inside, IIRC. I'm not sure what the potential amounts of radiation are because the plant hasn't really been very forthcoming with information and that leads me to believe it's higher than we think.
 
#24
#24
When it's setting off radiation detectors from aircraft flying 30,000 feet in the air near it, when arriving in Chicago, it's worth worrying about.

Question: Why is she even making this argument? What's her point?
 
#25
#25
IPorange said:
When it's setting off radiation detectors from aircraft flying 30,000 feet in the air near it, when arriving in Chicago, it's worth worrying about.

Question: Why is she even making this argument? What's her point?
Click to expand...

Duh, bat shat crazy....
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top