dukes_of_maggard
VNFL
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2012
- Messages
- 2,313
- Likes
- 50
Can we add a column for "bang for your buck"? There's spending money, and then there's money well spent.
After stinking it up since the mid-90s, you successfully shattered the bank for a winning coach. Congrats on your sudden good fortune.
I would consider UT's Wins/Recruiting Budget to be more a result of the circumstances of the past four years than anything else.
Since Saban's arrival at Bama, I'm betting that UT's budget for paying head coaches hasn't been significantly lower than Alabama's, given that UT has been paying people to not coach football.
The same could've been said for Bill Curry, Mike Dubose, Mike Price, Dennis Franchione and Mike Shula.
We can only hope it won't take that many coaches to finally get it right.
According to ESPN:
Tennessee: $1.4M
Alabama: $980K
Auburn: $950K
Arkansas: $666K
Georgia: $623K
Florida: $602K
Mississippi: $495K
Missouri: $363K
Kentucky: $336K
LSU: $302K
Mississippi State: $306K
South Carolina: $248K
Texas A&M: $240K
Vandy doesn't have to report
Thoughts?
Actually, Curry and Franchione quit, so we didn't pay them a buyout. And Price was fired for cause, so no buyout there, either. And as bad as Dubose sucked, he has a more recent SEC championship than Fulmer.
I can understand LSU being low due to the fact that they have no competition for the in-state talent and they can basically hand pick who they want.
Yeah Louisiana has top talent - but Florida produces that same talent in a much large quantity.. So I still don't get it - they get who they want in Florida for the most part right now as long as the guy didn't grow up a Seminole or Cane and isn't one of the "I want to leave the state" kids. There's enough for all three big Florida schools to stay home and barely leave the state to get guys. I guess it's due to UF choosing to recruit more nationally rather than needing to.