lawgator1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 72,765
- Likes
- 42,933
Given Romney's popular vote totals, I'll stick with my previous comment.
Can't wait until Mitt becomes Obama 2.0
It's gonna be a hard reset, my friends. We're not changing course until there's no other choice.
I'll take Sarah Palin's endorsement over those of Van Jones, Bill Ayers and the editorial board of the New York Times.
Romney has a good chance of winning simply because Obama has proven to be an incompetent buffoon whose leadership "style" is akin to the 18 year old who has just been promoted to shift leader at the local McDondald's.
Regardless of your personal preference, do you not agree that the trend in the polls is substantially towards reelection of Obama and that a significant reason for that is that Romney is uninspiring?
Absent some major catastrophe, Romney's chances are bleak, and dwindling every day.
Even the "big news" event that everyone anticipates-- the SCOTUS striking down the individual mandate -- will be tough to turn into much since it was Romney who first did it and said it should be done at the federal level.
He wrote an op-ed in USA Today in '09 that basically suggested that Obama dump the public option and model his health care reform after the Massachusetts system... Which is exactly what he did.
so why is Ron Paul allowed to change his mind but Romney isn't?
You can change your mind. Admit you were wrong. But he claims Romneycare is different because it was on the state level. Lo and behold he advocated it on the Federal level.
What are you referring to with regard to Ron Paul?
I, in fact, wish Romney would change his mind. His mind is set on whatever will get him elected.
You can change your mind. Admit you were wrong. But he claims Romneycare is different because it was on the state level. Lo and behold he advocated it on the Federal level.
What are you referring to with regard to Ron Paul?
I, in fact, wish Romney would change his mind. His mind is set on whatever will get him elected.