Arizona Election Audit

#2,554
#2,554
BowlBrother85 said:
We have covered this before... just a couple days ago, in fact.... but what the hell? Let's start with this whopper from the comedy team of Doug Logan and Sidney Powell:

per FactCheck.org:

CLAIM:

"Attorney Sidney Powell claimed that widely used voting machines from the election technology company Dominion Voting Systems featured software created "at the direction" of former Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez to swing his own elections results, and that the company has ties to the Clinton Foundation and George Soros".

CONCLUSION: THIS IS FALSE.

None of this is true. Dominion has no corporate ties with Venezuela, the Clinton Foundation or George Soros.
Click to expand...


Its complicated....Dominion and Smartmatic are separate yet they are intertwined.

The link Between Dominion, Sequoia, Smartmatic, and the CCP - GNEWS

While it is true that Soros has no corporate ties with Dominion it would be irresponsible to say that George Soros has no influence on Smartmatic. He was a very close friend to Lord Malloch Brown and they worked together in their roles in the Open Society Foundations. This information comes from Wickapedia.
Lord Malloch Brown is the Chairman of the Board of Directors for Smartmatic. One could start connecting the dots here and see that maybe it's not an outrageous accusation to say that Soros might have a little influence here.

Mark Malloch Brown - Wikipedia

Screenshot_20210603-154041_Chrome.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20210603-154105_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20210603-154105_Chrome.jpg
    556.1 KB · Views: 0
#2,555
#2,555
VolinWayne said:
Its complicated....Dominion and Smartmatic are separate yet they are intertwined.

The link Between Dominion, Sequoia, Smartmatic, and the CCP - GNEWS

While it is true that Soros has no corporate ties with Dominion it would be irresponsible to say that George Soros has no influence on Smartmatic. He was a very close friend to Lord Malloch Brown and they worked together in their roles in the Open Society Foundations. This information comes from Wickapedia.
Lord Malloch Brown is the Chairman of the Board of Directors for Smartmatic. One could start connecting the dots here and see that maybe it's not an outrageous accusation to say that Soros might have a little influence here.

Mark Malloch Brown - Wikipedia

View attachment 371733
Click to expand...
Soros knows a ton of people. Heck he probably has closer ties than that to Trump.
 
#2,562
#2,562
TN Ribs said:
So, we can now add "clinically delusional" to the list of adjectives to describe Trump. It's amazing how quickly one person can drag an entire electorate into the sewer, the GOP may never recover from their cult-like devotion to a sociopath.
Click to expand...
Lol
The mob is fickle. The GOP will be fine and Trump will go away as quickly as he arrived.
I remember when Bush sr was president and freedom was breaking out all over the world. People were saying that the Democrats might as well skip the next election and 2 years later we had president Clinton.
2024 is a long way away. Plenty of time for Tim Scott to become the first black Republican president
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol and StarRaider
#2,563
#2,563
Orangeslice13 said:
Lol
The mob is fickle. The GOP will be fine and Trump will go away as quickly as he arrived.
I remember when Bush sr was president and freedom was breaking out all over the world. People were saying that the Democrats might as well skip the next election and 2 years later we had president Clinton.
2024 is a long way away. Plenty of time for Tim Scott to become the first black Republican president
Click to expand...

DC has waaaay too much power now. There will inevitably be too much bickering now, no matter who.
 
#2,565
#2,565
Orangeslice13 said:
Lol
The mob is fickle. The GOP will be fine and Trump will go away as quickly as he arrived.
I remember when Bush sr was president and freedom was breaking out all over the world. People were saying that the Democrats might as well skip the next election and 2 years later we had president Clinton.
2024 is a long way away. Plenty of time for Tim Scott to become the first black Republican president
Click to expand...
True ... after Desert Storm was over in March of 1991, Bush's approval rating in Gallup was 80%. That is still the highest approval rating that Gallup has ever recorded for a sitting president - and they were founded in 1935. Bush ended up only receiving 39% of the popular vote in 1992 (with a strong 3rd party candidate in Ross Perot also on the ballot). It's amazing how fast things fell apart for him.
 
#2,566
#2,566
BowlBrother85 said:
True ... after Desert Storm was over in March of 1991, Bush's approval rating in Gallup was 80%. That is still the highest approval rating that Gallup has ever recorded for a sitting president - and they were founded in 1935. Bush ended up only receiving 39% of the popular vote in 1992 (with a strong 3rd party candidate in Ross Perot also on the ballot). It's amazing how fast things fell apart for him.
Click to expand...

Or any President..
 
#2,568
#2,568
SlingBlayde said:
Of course. Fraud always happens on both sides. But we're talking about a micro scale with Trump and a macro scale with Biden (only in certain blue states). Just wait, more and more evidence will come out. Propaganda is easy, sounds great and put out daily by the MSM. The truth often takes months and even years to be discovered.
Click to expand...

You do know the difference between 2016 and 2020 was Biden outperformed Crooked Hillary in suburban/exurban counties in swing states. These counties typically lean Republican and are run by Republicans. Had Trump just maintained his 2016 percentages in these counties, he'd be the POTUS today.
 
#2,570
#2,570
BowlBrother85 said:
True ... after Desert Storm was over in March of 1991, Bush's approval rating in Gallup was 80%. That is still the highest approval rating that Gallup has ever recorded for a sitting president - and they were founded in 1935. Bush ended up only receiving 39% of the popular vote in 1992 (with a strong 3rd party candidate in Ross Perot also on the ballot). It's amazing how fast things fell apart for him.
Click to expand...
That’s when the democrats stonewalled everything and the divisiveness really started ratcheting up..... and it’s gotten worse ever since
 
#2,571
#2,571
BigOrangeMojo said:
You do know the difference between 2016 and 2020 was Biden outperformed Crooked Hillary in suburban/exurban counties in swing states. These counties typically lean Republican and are run by Republicans. Had Trump just maintained his 2016 percentages in these counties, he'd be the POTUS today.
Click to expand...
But a dementia patient that hid in his basement and had political rallies attended by 3-4 people managed to get the most votes of any presidential candidate in history.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne and davethevol
#2,572
#2,572
Carl Pickens said:
But a dementia patient that hid in his basement and had political rallies attended by 3-4 people managed to get the most votes of any presidential candidate in history.....
Click to expand...

And a pu**y grabbing misogynistic pig had the 2nd most.

Honestly, both sides have always and will continue to cheat at the margins. The Democratic party isn't smart enough to pull off a multi jurisdictional cheating (primarily in R leaning counties) campaign like those hypothesized by the MyPillow guy.

Trump barely won a handful of swing states in 16 and barely lost a handful in 20. The difference wasn't in the heavily D cities but Trump underperformed (as compared to 2016) with white suburban/exurban women. If he maintained his 2016 percentages with this 1 group, he's POTUS today...
 
  • Like
Reactions: LouderVol
#2,573
#2,573
BigOrangeMojo said:
And a pu**y grabbing misogynistic pig had the 2nd most.

Honestly, both sides have always and will continue to cheat at the margins. The Democratic party isn't smart enough to pull off a multi jurisdictional cheating (primarily in R leaning counties) campaign like those hypothesized by the MyPillow guy.

Trump barely won a handful of swing states in 16 and barely lost a handful in 20. The difference wasn't in the heavily D cities but Trump underperformed (as compared to 2016) with white suburban/exurban women. If he maintained his 2016 percentages with this 1 group, he's POTUS today...
Click to expand...

So simplistic. If suburban women were the difference, are you saying that Abrams and city blacks such had no effect?
 
#2,574
#2,574
Carl Pickens said:
That’s when the democrats stonewalled everything and the divisiveness really started ratcheting up..... and it’s gotten worse ever since
Click to expand...
No, that is not one which can be blamed on Democrats. All of Bush's successes were in foreign policy. The economy was faltering with rising unemployment... and his response (or non-response) to the LA riots in May of 1992 hurt him. And his messaging was all wrong in 1992... he wanted to talk about family values, while the American people wanted to talk about the economy. Bush ran a very poor campaign in 1992.... and he wasn't helped by an inept running mate that couldn't be taken seriously.
 
#2,575
#2,575
Orangeburst said:
So simplistic. If suburban women were the difference, are you saying that Abrams and city blacks such had no effect?
Click to expand...

They did in GA. A combination of the two factors turned GA from light red to purple.

Trump wins AZ, PA, WI keeping the same suburban percentages in 2016.

Throughout the country, red state or blue state, battleground state or no, Trump lost a percentage point or 2 in the suburbs. That flipped small wins to small losses.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top