Arizona Election Audit

#2,403
#2,403
Weezer said:
I don't consider anyone who votes by party sensible. As far as a better outcome, he could have left out the part about exonerate/does not exonerate.

None of that changes that Mueller is clearly anti-Trump. The GOP is split.
Click to expand...
That couldn't possibly be based on Mueller's conclusive findings contained in the report. It could have been left out, but it doesn't accuse Trump of any wrongdoing. You are doing some hardcore nitpicking if you consider that to be proof that Mueller is "anti-Trump". The Mueller report was fair to Trump.
 
#2,404
#2,404
BowlBrother85 said:
That couldn't possibly be based on Mueller's conclusive findings contained in the report. It could have been left out, but it doesn't accuse Trump of any wrongdoing. You are doing some hardcore nitpicking if you consider that to be proof that Mueller is "anti-Trump". The Mueller report was fair to Trump.
Click to expand...
The Mueller Report was the product of a witch hunt. Given that, it's hard for me to say it was "fair". But where did I say that report was my basis for stating Mueller is clearly anti-Trump?
 
#2,405
#2,405
Weezer said:
The Mueller Report was the product of a witch hunt. Given that, it's hard for me to say it was "fair". But where did I say that report was my basis for stating Mueller is clearly anti-Trump?
Click to expand...
The Russia probe is the only time that an anti-Trump bias on the part of Robert Mueller would have been relevant.

Then why don't you come out and say what the basis is? Mueller doesn't do interviews. It's not easy to find a record of him speaking to the media at all. You aren't going to find any political opinions of his on the internet.
 
#2,406
#2,406
BowlBrother85 said:
The Russia probe is the only time that an anti-Trump bias on the part of Robert Mueller would have been relevant.

Then why don't you come out and say what the basis is? Mueller doesn't do interviews. It's not easy to find a record of him speaking to the media at all. You aren't going to find any political opinions of his on the internet.
Click to expand...
It's not hard to see by his actions and limited words where he falls. I'm sorry you are unable to read people like most of us can. Must make social situations a real pain in the ass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#2,407
#2,407
Orangeslice13 said:
uhhhh
If something went wrong, you recount the hard copies.



So which is it?
The computer system is or isn’t easily audited?
The pro Biden would be just as irrelevant as their results will be just as subject to review.
Click to expand...
If hard copies go missing, or get damaged, stored some place and forgot, lost in physical transport, there is absolutely zero way to check/validate them.

It's more complicated the Crtl+F but there are ways to comphresively search digital files without boring some volunteer to death individually collating paper ballots.

Paper makes a great back up option if something goes wrong, or if it needs to be verified, as then you have two separate sources to compare. Relying on one makes no sense. Especially something as easy to fake as printed out ballots.

Heck that was one of the concerns, remember that bamboo paper was going to invalidate thousands of votes. Sounds real secure.
 
#2,408
#2,408
LouderVol said:
If hard copies go missing, or get damaged, stored some place and forgot, lost in physical transport, there is absolutely zero way to check/validate them.

It's more complicated the Crtl+F but there are ways to comphresively search digital files without boring some volunteer to death individually collating paper ballots.

Paper makes a great back up option if something goes wrong, or if it needs to be verified, as then you have two separate sources to compare. Relying on one makes no sense. Especially something as easy to fake as printed out ballots.

Heck that was one of the concerns, remember that bamboo paper was going to invalidate thousands of votes. Sounds real secure.
Click to expand...
If hard copies go missing the someone goes to jail for a long long time.
 
#2,409
#2,409
Weezer said:
It's not hard to see by his actions and limited words where he falls. I'm sorry you are unable to read people like most of us can. Must make social situations a real pain in the ass.
Click to expand...
You haven't posted a link to anything that Mueller has done or said which implies an anti-Trump bias. What is there to read? Specifically, what words and actions are you talking about? I think if you had something specific in mind, you would say what it was. I can read just fine... I just think you're full of $hit.
 
#2,410
#2,410
BowlBrother85 said:
You haven't posted a link to anything that Mueller has done or said which implies an anti-Trump bias. What is there to read? Specifically, what words and actions are you talking about? I think if you had something specific in mind, you would say what it was. I can read just fine... I just think you're full of $hit.
Click to expand...
For example. when Mueller wanted Barr to release more of the report than he had. Happy now?
 
#2,411
#2,411
BowlBrother85 said:
You haven't posted a link to anything that Mueller has done or said which implies an anti-Trump bias. What is there to read? Specifically, what words and actions are you talking about? I think if you had something specific in mind, you would say what it was. I can read just fine... I just think you're full of $hit.
Click to expand...
And we all know you're full of **** spewing your liberal bias. You don't even pretend to take a rational, non-partisan look at situations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#2,412
#2,412
Weezer said:
For example. when Mueller wanted Barr to release more of the report than he had. Happy now?
Click to expand...
Simply wanting a more thorough summary of the report to be made public, isn't proof of a bias. You are really straining to make a case for Mueller being "anti-Trump" ... after saying that he was "clearly" biased.
 
#2,413
#2,413
BowlBrother85 said:
Simply wanting a more thorough summary of the report to be made public, isn't proof of a bias. You are really straining to make a case for Mueller being "anti-Trump" ... after saying that he was "clearly" biased.
Click to expand...
He is clearly anti-Trump. I'm not the only one to see it. But you keep doing you. You clearly see the world as the left tells you to see it.
 
#2,414
#2,414
She's been removed. What's the point of hounding her?

More proof these guys wont even attempt to deliver a fair report.
 
#2,415
#2,415
BowlBrother85 said:
Simply wanting a more thorough summary of the report to be made public, isn't proof of a bias. You are really straining to make a case for Mueller being "anti-Trump" ... after saying that he was "clearly" biased.
Click to expand...

The Muell wanted a more detailed summary of the report released so he could see what was in it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hUTch2002
#2,418
#2,418
Weezer said:
He is clearly anti-Trump. I'm not the only one to see it. But you keep doing you. You clearly see the world as the left tells you to see it.
Click to expand...
Then why can't you give me at least one example of Mueller expressing dislike or disrespect for Donald Trump? You keep saying its clear... if that's true, then you should be able to explain why you feel that way.
 
#2,419
#2,419
BigOrangeTrain said:
What if there were a ton of fraud in favor of Trump? Wouldn’t you want to know that? I know I would.
Click to expand...
The problem is, even if that did happen, there isn't a chance in hell "Cyber Ninjas" would come out and say it. If it were a neutral party doing the "audit" then I would agree. The only reason "Cyber Ninjas" was hired is because they already publicly stated they are on team Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128, LouderVol and BowlBrother85
#2,422
#2,422
K-town Vol Fan said:
Sounds exactly like you guys the past 4 years.
Click to expand...
Who is "you guys"? I'm neither Republican nor Democrat. I wasn't a fan of Trump, nor am I fan of Biden.

I think a lot of people on this board read things into posts that aren't there based on their own biases and what they believe response will be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hUTch2002
#2,423
#2,423
BowlBrother85 said:
Then why can't you give me at least one example of Mueller expressing dislike or disrespect for Donald Trump? You keep saying its clear... if that's true, then you should be able to explain why you feel that way.
Click to expand...
Do you think I'm saying Mueller let his anti-Trump feelings influence his investigation? I didn't make that claim. Between his actions, his testimony to Congress, other snippets here and there, even just his overall demeanor and personality, Mueller does not like Trump. I stand by that. I don't have the ability to have him call you up and confirm.
 
#2,425
#2,425
BowlBrother85 said:
Judge Stephanos Bibas did give attorneys for the 2020 Trump Campaign the opportunity to present evidence of fraud... and they didn't. However, those attorneys did make allegations of fraud in Pennsylvania while appearing on Fox News just a few days earlier. That could easily lead a reasonable person to conclude that those attorneys were just blowing smoke on cable news. They wouldn't make the same allegations in court, that they were making on tv, and that is because there could be repercussions for their law licenses if they were caught making false allegations and/or lying to a court. Such an observation isn't a false statement. It's conjecture based on facts.

There isn't a good explanation as to why the Trump legal team never alleged fraud in court, after being so eager to do so on cable news.

Even Sidney Powell's defense has been something like: No reasonable person would believe me anyway.

However, we know better than that on this forum. You, and that @NCFisher guy and @VolinWayne were lapping up everything that crazy loon said in November and December.
Click to expand...

You’re a blatant liar and a stupid, petty person.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top