They also played head to head...
Look at our incoming recruits.
Look at Pearl's.
Even if we assume Tyndall is the better coach, it may not matter soon because Auburn will dwarf us in talent.
So, knowing that, Tyndall has to be a better coach to stay on Pearl's level because so far Tyndall isn't even a blip on the radar in the recruiting world while Pearl just recruited four 4*(three in the top 91) with two other 3* according to rivals, while we in the same class got two 3*.
Also, if Tyndall is a better coach as a whole, why was Pearl more successful at UW Milwaukee than Tyndall was at Southern Miss? Southern Miss is a much better program as far as athletics go. Pearl has been better out of the gate at all 3 schools he's been at(prior to Auburn) compared to the 3 schools Tyndall is at. And after 3 years removed, he has about the same record as Tyndall in his return. Beating Pearl in Pearl's first year isn't a big accomplishment given how bad both rosters are. We already know pearl can beat #1 teams(Kansas/Memphis) and national champion teams(Florida). I'll take that history over a single win against a first year head coach at their current program. Tyndall's win over Pearl this year literally proves nothing.
I'm not saying Tyndall isn't a better coach but I'm saying Pearl's history proves for the time being he's the better coach. Tyndall has literally none of the accomplishments Pearl has. Zero wins over #1 teams and zero sweet 16 appearances, which obviously means zero elite 8 appearances. Time will tell but as far as the entire world can tell, Pearl is better than Tyndall by default. It's not even close as far as perception goes. There is a reason ESPN asked Pearl to join them. To date, ESPN would have zero desire to go after someone like Tyndall because he has a ways to go to even be considered in Pearl's league.
Again, Pearl came back after 3 years removed and immediately brought in a top 10 class to a school that generally sucks ass at basketball. That should also tell you about how both are perceived. People perceive Pearl to be one of the best coaches in the country. People don't even know who Donnie Tyndall is. Go outside of the SEC and ask someone who Donnie Tyndall is and they'll probably think you're making him up that he's the head coach of Tennessee. I'm not kidding, I live in the midwest and I obviously talk about Tennessee with friends while they talk about the Big 10. They have no idea idea who our coach is, who Donnie Tyndall is in general or where he came from. Just throwing that out there...
And as far as Tyndall beating Pearl head to head... Bobby Johnson beat Phil Fulmer once. What does that matter? Fulmer won a championship while Bobby Johnson was lucky just to get a regular season win against any and all opponents. That Lousiana Monroe coach beat Saban in his first year at Bama, I to this date have no idea who that guy was. Him beating Saban is irrelevant because who knows if that guy even has a job anymore while Saban is building a dynasty as possibly the greatest college football coach of all-time. So... it's very possible Tyndall has the same future to look forward to as Bobby Johnson and that dude who coached LA Monroe. A fond memory of beating a bad Auburn team that's almost always bad and somehow being a good win cause it's against our former coach. Whoopty doo.
Edit: Just looked it up, the LA Monroe coach was named Charlie Weatherbie and he was fired a season or two after beating Alabama. He hasn't been hired by anyone since. I don't even think he was 55 when he was fired so that says how good of a coach he actually was seeing as he's 60 now and never coached again. And actually, Alabama wasn't bad that year. Sure their record was but they didn't lose a single game by more than 7 points. They lost to Louisiana Monroe by 7, Florida State by 7, Auburn by 7 LSU by 7, Miss St by 5, and Georgia by 3. Sadly, we along with Vanderbilt and Western Carolina were the only teams they beat by more than 4 points. They beat Vandy by 14, WC by 46 and us by 24.
Anyways, again, my point being that Tyndall's win over Pearl could mean absolutely nothing what so ever. Just like it meant for Bobby Johnson and Charlie Weatherbie. They suck and nobody cares that they beat Phil Fulmer/Tennessee and Nick Saban/Alabama. That means Tyndall's win over a terrible Auburn team(and coach removed from 3 years) isn't even something I myself as a Tennessee fan will remember in the years to come because it meant absolutely nothing. We're gonna be about .500 when the season ends and I don't know which direction our team is headed. Auburn is going to be about .500 when their season ends and I'm pretty sure they're headed for the top 25. If it comes to that, at least we always had that one win over a .500 Auburn team. Let's celebrate!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Smile :) :)"