Fine Vol
Go Vols
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2006
- Messages
- 19,849
- Likes
- 2
Baseball is the most constant of all the major sports. The greats would be great in any era. Ruth's greatest value in today's game would be as a 25 game winning lefthanded starter.
I was thinking the same same thing. If anything it is much easier to hit home runs these days. Parks are smaller, equipment is better, strike zone is smaller too.
Walter Johnson threw every bit as hard as Nolan Ryan. There were knuckleballers, as well as spitballers in Ruth's era. He got Ty Cobb and Jimmy Foxx out. I don't think anyone you list is significantly better than those guys. It's still 60 feet 6 inches to the plate and 90 feet between bases. Ruth would be dominant in any era.Could Ruth have hit a Nolan Ryan 103mph fastball or one of Phil Niekro's knuckleballs?
As a pitcher, could Ruth strike out Pete Rose, Ichiro, A-Rod, Jeter, Reggie Jackson, Bonds?
I think the game has changed a lot more than some of you are implying. I don't think Ruth would last very long in today's game.
This I am in agreement with 110%.Walter Johnson threw every bit as hard as Nolan Ryan. There were knuckleballers, as well as spitballers in Ruth's era. He got Ty Cobb and Jimmy Foxx out. I don't think anyone you list is significantly better than those guys. It's still 60 feet 6 inches to the plate and 90 feet between bases. Ruth would be dominant in any era.
with these scrawny handled bats (compared to his bowling ball weighted jobs), Ruth could've hit a 140 mph fastball. He was the best hitter the game has seen, apologies to TWilliams fans, of which I'm one. Had Williams not lost his best years to the Air Corps, his would likely be the first name off our lips, but I still don't think he could hit it like Babe.Could Ruth have hit a Nolan Ryan 103mph fastball or one of Phil Niekro's knuckleballs?
As a pitcher, could Ruth strike out Pete Rose, Ichiro, A-Rod, Jeter, Reggie Jackson, Bonds?
I think the game has changed a lot more than some of you are implying. I don't think Ruth would last very long in today's game.
Muscle mass really only matters on balls hit away from the sweet spot like jam shots are balls off the end of the bat. Otherwise, hitting is about bat speed, hand/eye coordination and timing. I'd much rather have a hitter that repeatedly hits the ball solidly over a guy that can muscle the ball out of the park. Strength plays a part in the equation, but it's probably the least important of the factors. Strength will determine the size of bat a player can swing and the inertia of a heavy bat is much higher, but in the upper echelons of the great hitters, everyone has the power to swing enough stick to get the job done.How could a guy like Babe or Williams hit as good as Bonds or Mcguire and not have half the muscle mass?
Great point, I wonder how Babes HR distance compares to the hitters of today?Muscle mass really only matters on balls hit away from the sweet spot like jam shots are balls off the end of the bat. Otherwise, hitting is about bat speed, hand/eye coordination and timing. I'd much rather have a hitter that repeatedly hits the ball solidly over a guy that can muscle the ball out of the park. Strength plays a part in the equation, but it's probably the least important of the factors. Strength will determine the size of bat a player can swing and the inertia of a heavy bat is much higher, but in the upper echelons of the great hitters, everyone has the power to swing enough stick to get the job done.
Great point, I wonder how Babes HR distance compares to the hitters of today?
THAT IS INTERESTINGAccording to baseball historian Bill Jenkinson Ruth hit a home run 600 to 650 ft. in an exhibition game.
Babe also has the longest home run in world series history at 510 ft.
Needless to say he hit them just as far if not farther than the guys today.
On Mickey Mantle's website it says he hit one like 640 ft. if it wouldn't have hit the top of the facade in right field at Yankee Stadium, almost going out of the park. It says the ball bounced all the way back to the infield.