Bowl Payouts

#1

JWVol

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2004
Messages
929
Likes
46
#1
Did anyone hear a number that the SEC earned in the bowl games this season? And from this number, it is distributed equally between all of the schools? I thought I had heard in the past that Vandy actually earned more money than a school that actually competed in a bowl since Vandy did not have any travel expenses. Is this correct? I bet they get to Destin a week early and camp outside of the SEC treasurer's room so they are first in line.



 
#2
#2
Sugar Bowl (Auburn) $14.4m
Music City (Alabama) $780k
Peach (Florida) $2.15m
Citrus (LSU) $5.125m
Cotton (Tennessee) $3m
Outback (Georgia) $2.75m

Total $28.2m


from various sources
The SEC's bowl revenue distribution formula divides the 28 bowls into four tiers, said Charles Bloom, an assistant commissioner with the SEC. The higher the tier, the more money a school gets off the top.

"The reasoning for that is that the bigger the bowl, the more it costs you to go," said Ole Miss' athletic director, Pete Boone. "There are a lot of additional expenses for the BCS bowls."

Under the current format, the SEC's representative to the BCS game gets $1.7 million of the payout and receives a travel allowance determined by the league office. If it’s the national championship game, the team gets to retain $1.8 million plus the travel allowance.

The remainder of the payout goes into a pool and is split 13 ways, one share each to the 12 conference members and one to the league office, which would result in about $1 million.

.......................

I would guess that Vanderbilt takes home close to $2 million dollars from the bowl revenue sharing in the SEC? And Vandy's expenses are even lower because they don't have an athletic department.

To compare, Notre Dame's cut from its bowl was only $750k (minus travel expenses).
 
#3
#3
this is why they do not get out of the conference and don't mind getting their players killed every week. they are in for the cash, sad but true.
 
#4
#4
I bet that 2 Mil goes along way for Gordon Gee's bowtie collection. It is funny how he found education once he got to Vandy. I don't remember him grandstanding up at Ohio State while his star athlete Katzenmoyer graduated while flunking those "gimmie" classes.(Basket weaving, etc . . )

At one time I took pity on Vandy. Now, due to Gee and his cronies, I just don't like them one bit. Especially after they charged more for the UT/Vandy game this year than for any other SEC game including the SEC Championship. All because they knew UT fans would pad their pockets with their attendance. They don't care about winning in football, they just want to cash the checks.
 
#6
#6
I want them in the SEC. . . it never gets old beating people who think they are smarter than you.
 
#7
#7
I want them in the SEC. . . it never gets old beating people who think they are smarter than you.



The key work there is THINKS. I cant believe they continue to take money away from winning programs.

Oh well someone has to be the punching bag :dunno:
 
#8
#8
I guess if they let us play men's basketball they have to let Vandy play football.
 
#9
#9
I would not call what UGA is doing this year actually playing. Like Vandy does in football we show up, get beat and go home.
 
#10
#10
Originally posted by GAVol@Jan 13, 2005 5:47 PM
I guess if they let us play men's basketball they have to let Vandy play football.

LOL!!!!! :dlol: :dlol:
 
#11
#11
Doesn't Vanderbilt help the SEC's GPA? I thought there was some quota of conference GPA's as far as the student athletes go...
 
#15
#15
Originally posted by BWeller18@Jan 13, 2005 6:41 PM
I'm sure if we think hard enough, we can think of something vandy is good at athletically.

Isn't their basketball team so-so?
 
#17
#17
Originally posted by milohimself@Jan 13, 2005 8:31 PM
Doesn't Vanderbilt help the SEC's GPA? I thought there was some quota of conference GPA's as far as the student athletes go...

They helped tremendously under the old formula. However, the NCAA has revised the formula to truly reflect graduation rates and the rest of the SEC has almost caught up to Vandy.
 
#19
#19
Previously, a graduation rate (percent) was based on a comparison of the number of students who entered a college or university and the number of those who graduated within six years.

It is important to note that graduation rates are affected by a number of factors: some students may work part-time and need more than six years to graduate, some may leave school for a year or two to work or travel, some may transfer to another college or university, or some may be dismissed for academic deficiencies.

Transfers of any kind (coming and/or going) were not included in the calculation.

Coach Philip Fulmer as well as other coaches across the country have made this argument: (1) Players become professionals and delay their graduation, (2) The statistics don't accurately reflect the academic achievements of the players, (3) Players who transfer and graduate from another institution still count against us, and (4) Players who transfer in from another institution and graduate don't count either.

The report that came out recently for players that entered school in 1997 had the Vols with a graduation rate of 50%. The national average was 57%. The overall student body at UT had a 59% graduation rate based on the 6-year formula.

For players entering school in 1996, the graduation rate was 47%.

One of the problems is basing graduation rates on a one-year period. For players entering school in 1991, Tennessee had a graduation rate of 11%, but for those entering in 1992, the rate rose to 59% (national average was 51% that year).

Here's a good illustration of how statistics can lie. According to the formula designed by the NCAA, the Vols’ graduation rate for the 1991-92 class was an awful 11%. Indeed, of the 18 student-athletes entering Tennessee that year, only two graduated within the six-year NCAA limit. That figure doesn't tell the whole story, though. According to Carmen Tegano, Tennessee’s assistant athletic director for student life, 10 of the 18 1991-92 freshmen were on NFL rosters at the start of the season. More importantly, four of those 10 players graduated with their degrees after the NCAA’s six-year cut off. In fact, six of the 18 (33%) student-athletes in Tennessee’s entering 1991-92 football class have received their college degrees. Of the rest, six are playing in the NFL and one is playing professional baseball. So one could say that six have graduated and several others are gainfully employed.

Tennessee's seemingly low graduation rate actually says more about how the NCAA measures graduation rates and the danger of relying on single year statistics than about the academic commitment of the school's football program. The NCAA graduation rates count only those student-athletes who enter as freshmen receiving athletic grants-in-aid and who graduate within six years. Athletes who transfer from the program, even if they graduate from other schools, count against the graduation rate. At the same time, athletes who transfer into the program and get their degrees do not count in favor of the graduation rate. Look at the academic performance of Tennessee's entering classes for 1992-93 and 1993-94. In the fall of 1992, according to Tegano, 22 recruited freshman joined the football team. According to NCAA criteria, 13 players (59%) graduated. That figure, however, is misleading. While those 13 students were working toward graduation, five other student-athletes transferred into the program. Four of them graduated. So, counting the 1992-93 class and transfers, 17 of 27 (63%) players finishing their athletic eligibility at UT graduated. And it gets better. For the 1993-94 freshman class, coach Phillip Fulmer's first at UT, 12 of 17 (70.5%) graduated according to NCAA measurement. Of the five players who did not graduate from UT, three had transferred to other schools where they did graduate. Also, another three players transferred into Tennessee, and they graduated. So, of the 20 student-athletes entering college in 1993-94 who either began or ended their collegiate football careers at Tennessee, 18 of 20, exactly 90%, graduated from college. And that's a long way from 11%.


The rates are often lowered by athletes who transfer or leave early for the pro ranks. The NCAA will change its statistics next year to take into account transfers and not penalize schools if athletes leave in good academic standing.
 

VN Store



Back
Top