I concur. Why visit a school, with your family no less, on the weekend before your Monday announcement, if the decision hasn't already been made.
I see it as the exact opposite. Why make the trip now if someone didn't still need further convincing? If the decision has been made, they could simply wait for the 16th, announce and then come out to check it out any time after.
Why do you think that Bryce is upset that the rumor is out?
Maybe because he anticipated that people would act exactly the way that they are and that if he doesn't go to UT, people will have gotten their hopes up for nothing.
Good point, Wheaton. Here are some reasons which I believe deserve strong consideration in the continuing discussion of Bryce Brown's recruitment, as it relates to his possible choosing between Oregon and Tennessee. I don't see where a comparison between Tennessee and Oregon is even open for reasonable debate at this point. In fact, other than the intrusive posters incessantly stating (read: hoping) otherwise, it likely wouldn't be. In almost every conceivable category of either significance or importance, there just is no comparison between Oregon and Tennessee - and the facts which support this conclusion are both inarguable and unavoidable.
Thank you for taking your time to put these posts together, D. However, at this point, I have to be a little concerned about you. You seem to be making arguments for why Tennessee fans have more bragging rights than Oregon fans. For all of your efforts with fancy font and coloring, you have failed to make any argument that is substantial toward why a recruit would pick either program for their current and relevant merits.
For your convenience, I will include links to the descriptions of the various logical fallacies you have employed in your posts so that you might understand better and move on to more substantial arguments (if you can think of any).
Overall All-Time W/L Records, Conference Championships, National Championships, Bowl Game Appearances, All-Time Team Rankings, Team Rankings in the "Modern" era (1975 - Present), Hot Dog Eating Championships
Logical Fallacy Employed:
Genetic fallacy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Past accolades are great for fans. However, they are a small consolation to players if no accolades are achieved while the player is actually on the team.
Logical Fallacy Employed:
Association fallacy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Brown can not play for the entire SEC. He must play for one team. Therefore, the record of current teams he is choosing is far more substantial than any cumulative conference records. This is due to the simple fact that, within every conference, there often exist weaker teams. Being on the weak team is not made any better for an individual player by the fact that the other teams are relatively stronger on average.
It also ignores the specific way in which they might be stronger. If a conference is strong due mostly to defensive play, those statistics become even more irrelevant. Since Brown is an offensive player, he is presumably looking to play in the most productive offense, right?
NFL Draft Picks, TOTAL (1936 Present)
Logical Fallacies Employed:
False analogy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Tennessee has an impressive cumulative history of NFL players. However, those players were coached by different people under different circumstances. That some lineman was drafted by the NFL from UT in the past will be of little consolation if Brown were to go as a lower pick than he hopes to.
All-American Selections, College Football Hall of Fame Inductees, Miss USA Runner-Ups
Logical Fallacies Employed:
False analogy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Awards specific to other players, coached by different people are not relevant to determining what awards the current players might achieve while being coached by the new staff.
Home Stadium Seating Capacity
It's true that the seating capacity is higher at UT. However, for lack of seating capacity, Oregon fans makes up for with well-known intensity (Brown has experienced this first hand and it may be one of the reasons he has said that Oregon "sells itself").
Additionally, there are plans in the works to expand Autzen stadium to a greater seating capacity. That could conceivably happen while Brown is at Oregon, if he chooses to go there. I think it could be seen as a plus to have the opportunity to establish a legacy at a school that involved making it possible to expand the stadium.
Not only is Oregon not comparable to Tennessee they never have been, and if they havent closed the distance at this point (their record over the last eight years doesnt reflect that they are), they never will. The sad reality is that outside of the last 8-10 years or so (their best time, by far
.but where they still didnt win anything), Oregons statistics make them relatively indistinguishable from the likes of Colorado, Mississippi and West Virginia. In fact, Oregon is historically shown to be the 5<SUP>th</SUP> best team in the Pac-10, cowering to the likes of arch-rivals Washington, USC, UCLA, Cal, and even Oregon State to some degree. I would concentrate on making up ground and offering the associated comparisons to those schools, first, before ever worrying about anyone else
.especially Tennessee, or anyone in the SEC. In fact, given your overall losing record to all major Pac-10 opponents outside of Oregon State (theres a feather in your hat), this should be more than enough of a challenge for a mid-tier program, in a mid-tier conference. [/FONT][/SIZE] You can hope, pray, argue, lament, yell, scream, rationalize, prod, cajole, attack, become passive-aggressive, put on a new pair of Nikes, hoot, holler, stomp or whatever else you want to do in order to convince yourself or others that all of this is somehow untrue. Guess what? It is. Perhaps you dont think that all of this accurately reflects the true state of your program. Guess what? It does.
I'm sorry. But, it doesn't. In all of your effort, you have avoided reference to the statistics that are most relevant to what Brown will most likely experience at either program: recent results. Perhaps you do this because the hopes of UT success, at this point, are based on fan conjecture instead of relevant track record and professional consensus.
Oregon is coming off of a 10-3 season after commanding the #2 rushing offense in the nation and is projected to be a top 25 (top 10 by some) team in all polls. UT is coming off of a 5-7 season and is not projected to make the top 25 in any poll that I'm aware of.
Maybe Tennessee will rebuild over time. But, a recruit only has 3-5 years at a school. It would be unfortunate for Brown to spend his entire college career at a program in rebuilding years when he could have entered the scene with a top team from year one.
Add to that the Kiffin factor. Due to his flamboyant approach, he has drawn an excessive amount of attention onto himself. He believes that the publicity is good. Maybe it will turn out to be. But, if he falters at all, the stage is set (by him) for the media to constantly talk about him not living up to his claims. How long do you think UT alumni will want to tolerate that kind of derision if Kiffin doesn't produce immediately? How annoying might it be for players to be constantly asked by reporters about their coach instead of about them?
Kiffin is a direct contrast to the coaching situation at Oregon. Chip Kelly enjoys widespread respect by the media and fans abroad. He is recognized as one of the top offensive minds in the college game and has proven himself on the field, at UO, with current players and most of the same staff. The concern at Oregon is not whether or not a new coach will last, work out or gain respect but rather how much the program has to do to make sure Kelly stays (and they have shown a commitment to keeping him there).
Thanks again for taking the time to make your list of arguments for why it's awesome to be a UT fan. I'm impressed. I look forward to seeing what you might come up with that would be good reasons for Brown to play there (other than seating capacity and geographical location).
Cliff notes: you got served, wheaton.
I'm your Huckleberry.