Bush is on the power-grab again

#4
#4
The problem is that Bush is so stupid that he actually believes this:

"The legislature's job is to write law. It's the executive branch's job to interpret law." --George W. Bush, Austin, Texas, Nov. 22, 2000
 
#7
#7
I think it is nothing short of dangerous to think of him as dumb. What he is not is curious, and that is even more dangerous.
 
#8
#8
I think it is nothing short of dangerous to think of him as dumb. What he is not is curious, and that is even more dangerous.

I don't think that Bush is bright at all. However, he is very calculating, and he's been on a power-grab since the day he first stepped foot into the oval office.
 
#10
#10
I don't think that Bush is bright at all. However, he is very calculating, and he's been on a power-grab since the day he first stepped foot into the oval office.
Right, a bunch of very dense people have Yale undergrad degrees and Harvard grad degrees...
 
#12
#12
Bush is a complete moron who, according to the left, is more than capable of pulling off numerous very sophisticated conspiracies.
 
#14
#14
Bush is a complete moron who, according to the left, is more than capable of pulling off numerous very sophisticated conspiracies.

Sophisticated? I'm not sure to what conspiracies you're referring, but the man planned on invading Iraq from the time he set foot in the office, and it wasn't the least bit difficult to see that.

This may put your mind at ease about my comments about Bush not being very bright. The American public, in general, is not very bright either. That is one of the big factors that helped Bush get elected. He resonates with the common man because he is at the average American's level.
 
#16
#16
Just because you have a degree from an Ivy league school, it doesn't mean you're smart.
 
#17
#17
This may put your mind at ease about my comments about Bush not being very bright. The American public, in general, is not very bright either. That is one of the big factors that helped Bush get elected. He resonates with the common man because he is at the average American's level.

:jpshakehead:
 
#19
#19
Not being eloquent has absolutely nothing to do with being smart or intelligent.
 
#20
#20
Not that I'm calling any of you stupid. You're the exceptions. :)
 
#21
#21
It's partly true and you know it. Bush speaks stupid and many relate to him because they completely understand what he says.

It's the suggestion that those who may have voted for Bush aren't intelligent is the part I reacting to.
 
#22
#22
Not being eloquent has absolutely nothing to do with being smart or intelligent.

Not being eloquent is one thing. However, Bush is without a doubt the worst public speaker that I have ever witnessed for someone that speaks in public on a regular basis.
 
#23
#23
Not being eloquent is one thing. However, Bush is without a doubt the worst public speaker that I have ever witnessed for someone that speaks in public on a regular basis.
Besides the fact that people who monitor and score debates for media outlets, have given the nod to Bush more often than not in Presidential debates. So, yes, there are worse public speakers.

Even so, being the worst public speaker in history still would not equate into stupidity. The connection is thus, to be a great public speaker one must have adequate knowledge of what it is they are speaking on. However, one can have adequate knowledge of a particular subject and not be able to articulate their thoughts orally.
 
#24
#24
Besides the fact that people who monitor and score debates for media outlets, have given the nod to Bush more often than not in Presidential debates.

Yes. You would be referring to those test groups of average Americans that the media outlets would gather together to score their reactions to the debates. This goes back to my point about the average American not being particularly bright.
 

VN Store



Back
Top