HotlantaVol
Polymath
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2006
- Messages
- 1,528
- Likes
- 0
(HotlantaVol @ Mar 19 said:UNC just lost to #11 seed George Mason in the second round. Considering we lost to a #7 seed, I have to think that this improves Pearl's stock for Coach of the Year. Roy Williams got no farther than Pearl in the tourney. What does everyone else think?
Yes he did just not in the coach's poll!!!!!(thunder5 @ Mar 19 said:I don't think either has a real chance at it. Pearl's team dropped five of the last eight and Williams just lost to an 11 seed. Both did great jobs this year and extremnely exceeded expectations. They just didn't get far enough to be seriously considered for coach of the year. Pearl didn't even get it in the SEC.
(thunder5 @ Mar 19 said:I don't think either has a real chance at it. Pearl's team dropped five of the last eight and Williams just lost to an 11 seed. Both did great jobs this year and extremnely exceeded expectations. They just didn't get far enough to be seriously considered for coach of the year. Pearl didn't even get it in the SEC.
(oklavol @ Mar 19 said:More likely the winner of the george mason vs. WSU game since that team makes the elite 8.
I don't know about you, but Dickie V. has seemed relatively quiet to me this season.(Vol423 @ Mar 19 said:No chance. Either Roy or Pearl wins it. I still say it will be Roy, but Pearl could win it. Having his very own ESPN special sure helps. Of course, Roy has Vitale pimping his name every time he gets on the air and he decides to discuss anything not associated with Duke.
Duke was UNC's bitch this year.(Vol423 @ Mar 19 said:Definitely a tough loss for my beloved Heels today. Much like UT, while the Heels far exceeded my expectations that I had for them before the season started, they certainly didn't play up to their full potential or their seeding in the NCAA tournament. Still, both teams were loads of fun to watch this season, and I'm eagerly looking forward to next season. Duke is going to be UNC's bitch next year.
(Vol423 @ Mar 19 said:Definitely a tough loss for my beloved Heels today. Much like UT, while the Heels far exceeded my expectations that I had for them before the season started, they certainly didn't play up to their full potential or their seeding in the NCAA tournament. Still, both teams were loads of fun to watch this season, and I'm eagerly looking forward to next season. Duke is going to be UNC's bitch next year.
(milohimself @ Mar 19 said:Duke was UNC's bitch this year.
(volinbham @ Mar 19 said:You are much kinder to a team that lost to a much lower seed than the 7 seed loss for UT. How about some equal time trashing?
(tidwell @ Mar 19 said:I'd be surprised if Duke doesn't have a top class coming in next year as well... McRoberts is looking like he'll be really good. Paulus just needs more experience running the point as well. Nelson should be turned loose more on the offensive end with Redick and Williams gone. That will be tough for them to recover from though.
Considering where each team was coming from this season, I'll give the split to UNC.(Vol423 @ Mar 19 said:They split this year. You ain't seen nothing yet. Reddick and Shelden Williams will be gone next year. UNC has the #1 recruiting class in the nation coming in, and Hansbrough and the rest of Carolina's freshmen will be better next year than this year. Seriously, if Carolina can keep Hansbrough from leaving before the end of his junior season, I don't think Duke is going to get a win off of the Heels for several years. The cupboard is going to be unusually bare at Duke next year.
(Vol423 @ Mar 20 said:I've never trashed the Vols. I've stated that they had a great season and played above their talent level for most of the season; however, due to their late season collapse they didn't deserve a #2 seed. In addition, they didn't live up to their seed in the NCAA tournament. I've stated that UNC didn't live up to its seed either. Where's the inconsistency here?
(volinbham @ Mar 19 said:Here's a sampling of quotes:
Lofton is a good player, but he isn't in the same class as Reddick, and Carolina shut him down on his home court. I love the comments about Carolina being inconsistent. They're not the ones that have dropped 4 of their last 6 games.
That is honestly the most ridiculous seed that I've ever seen the selection committee produce. I could see UT getting a #4 seed, but honestly, they deserved a #5 seed. A #2 seed is totally inexplicable.
You heard it here first, folks. UT goes down in Round #1 to Winthrop. Winthrop has a lot of NCAA tournament experience over the last few years.
As I said before, I would have no real issue with a #4 seed. #3 seeds, however, don't drop 4 of their last 6 games. UT didn't deserve a #3 seed, and the only logical explanation for the Vols getting a #2 seed is the selection committee hitting the crack pipe.
If UT can survive to get to the Sweet 16, though, Roy and the boys will be more than happy to boot the Vols back to Knoxville.
The great thing about the Vols getting the #2 seed is that it clears the path for the Tarheels to get to the Elite 8 without having to play a real #2 seed.
Bilas on ESPN Bracketology just said that UT better come ready to play because Winthrop has some great players and they are more than capable of beating UT.
I beat him to the punch and went on record first, though. Winthrop over UT in Round 1.
Your posts consistently were negative against UT - no crime - but I never saw the corresponding negative quotes about UNC. Perhaps they are on another board.
Given your predictions it is clearly UNC that underachieved moreso than the Vols and should be getting many more negative comments from you than you've spent on UT. After all, UNC would have beaten UT (your quote) and UNC lost to an 11 seed while UT lost to 7 seed.