golfballs
Mostly Peaceful Poster
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2009
- Messages
- 75,414
- Likes
- 57,668
Then why aren’t the coaches paid with tuition/scholarships? Both groups are adults. It’s amazing to me the number of people who are pro capitalism and think it’s some how reasonable.What people forget is that the football players (as well as many other athletes) are being paid. I will use Stanford as an example sense it is in California. It costs $75,000 per year to go to Stanford. Let’s say an athlete spends 20 hours a week every week for a year. That is basically 1,000 hours of work a year. So a Stanford football player is making $75 an hour. This does not include the cost of the benefits they get which are far above what other students get.
The per hour figure would vary greatly across the country but to say athletes are not getting paid is totally inaccurate.
The down side to this, the NCAA has said, they will not be eligible for any bowl games. I'll be curious to see how this works itself out.Starting in 2023, recruits will be flocking to UCLA, USC, and other California colleges. Will this be the end of all of the 543 star recruits for the SEC?? Due to the players getting paid??
Yep. They will not be NCAA athletes then. California will have its own league then.The down side to this, the NCAA has said, they will not be eligible for any bowl games. I'll be curious to see how this works itself out.
They're about to drop a bill in the Georgia legislature...
Bill seeks to pay college athletes in Georgia
This would mark the end of college sports. Too bad. Should have limited the amount college coaches can be paid to protect the sport. Once those guys start knocking down 90 million dollar contracts of course the players get restless. The whole thing will come crashing down on their heads very soon.