Can someone explain this to me?

#2
#2
I certainly don't oppose in principle. Would have to see the language of the bill to see if there are reasons to object to some specifics.
 
#3
#3
volinbham said:
I certainly don't oppose in principle. Would have to see the language of the bill to see if there are reasons to object to some specifics.
Click to expand...

That is what I have been trying to find. Surely there is something crazy in there.
 
#7
#7
(a) None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be used for any existing or new Federal contract if the contractor or a subcontractor at any tier requires that an employee or independent contractor, as a condition of employment, sign a contract that mandates that the employee or independent contractor performing work under the contract or subcontract resolve through arbitration any claim under title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 or any tort related to or arising out of sexual assault or harassment, including assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment, or negligent hiring, supervision, or retention.
Click to expand...

.
 
#13
#13
I can understand why a vote here would be tough.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#15
#15
volinbham said:
I certainly don't oppose in principle. Would have to see the language of the bill to see if there are reasons to object to some specifics.
Click to expand...

agreed, and why is this amendment being tacked on to a Defense appropriations bill?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top