VolunteerHillbilly
Spike Drinks, Not Trees
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2005
- Messages
- 40,778
- Likes
- 15,192
There's one factor that seemed to escape the discussion ...
Things weren't really that bad.
Of the six losses, the first was at Florida. No shame there. The second was against Georgia. Didn't the Dawgs win the SEC title? The third came on a few fluky late plays in a 6-3 heartbreaker at Alabama. What's wrong with that? The fourth was on a last-second field goal against South Carolina, and the fifth was against a Notre Dame team that played in the BCS. Yeah, losing at home to Vanderbilt is unacceptable, but by that point the team was so mentally beaten down after such a disappointing season that it was a shadow of its former self.
You make your own breaks.(crazyguy @ May 10 said:just to add to that...remember all the crazy breaks we got in 98? I mean we could have lost 3 of those games very easily...last year we didn't get any breaks, and that was a huge part of the problem. sometimes you just gotta get the breaks.
(VolunteerHillbilly @ May 10 said:a few quotes I liked from the articles:
"...things have to change in a big way this season of there will be a new coaching era beginning next year at this time."
I agree wholeheartedly with that sentiment.
(hatvol96 @ May 10 said:Is Jimmy Hyams now working for CFN? That article is pure Fulmer apologist blather. CFN has always been a second rate website, but this is a new low.
(hatvol96 @ May 10 said:Is Jimmy Hyams now working for CFN? That article is pure Fulmer apologist blather. CFN has always been a second rate website, but this is a new low.
(VolBeef88 @ May 10 said:"...things have to change in a big way this season of there will be a new coaching era beginning next year at this time."
I agree wholeheartedly with that sentiment.
Way to go Hillbilly. I knew that you could find the negative. Thanks for not letting us all down.
(VolunteerHillbilly @ May 10 said:Thanks for finally admitting that you care more about retaining Fulmer than you do about the success of the program.
It is a reasonable inference from your assertion that it is "negative" to say there will be a new coaching regime without bigtime improvement. Based on you statement, you think it is postive to stay with what we've got with little or no improvement. I think I'll get some back-up on this one.(VolBeef88 @ May 10 said:OK hillbilly. Show me where I said that retaining anyone is more important. Go ahead and show me. You can't because all I did was show that you look for the negative in anything UT.
I agree on this point. Its great to have skill players that are speedburners and consistant, but if the big men on the Offensive Line arent gettin it done, its hard to move the chains. IMO the #1 factor for the Vols this upcoming season with Ainge being retooled, the wr's reloading with catch confidence, and a solid RB group is 'will we have an o-line that performs? Or will Ainge and Foster be looking at a team photo of the opponent on every snap? In the SEC its all about moving the chains, take what they give you and be patient...move the chains and the victories will come.(duckman398686 @ May 10 said:Anybody look at the offensive starting projections? Michael Frogg at center????? What happened to the McNeil(I think that was his name) guy that we recruited... The offensive line and the linebackers are the areas that scare me the most. We lost alot of expereince in these two areas.