Getting manhandled in trenches and you are a fool if you don't think this affects those kids and message he has been preaching. He needs great half time speech and good 2 nd half results
I suspect the bad judgment of the QB coach, OC, and HC results from their inferior perspective of seeing players everyday instead of only Saturdays from your couch.As far as coaching, after seeing what Dobbs can already do it's clear he should have been starting for a while (he looked more comfortable and in command on his first series than Worley has at almost any time this season). Also, it was clear by watching some of the replays that our OC did not call a good game. For example the pick 6 at the end of the half was obviously a designed play to throw deep down that sideline but there was nothing available there (even Worley with healthy finger had no business throwing that pass) - the CBS analysis's clearly showed the replay where our receivers on both sidelines were double teamed before the play so the passing play was probably available in the middle (some type of screen) - I would expect our OC to see that and make adjustment if the CBS analysts were able to so easily pick it up.
I suspect the bad judgment of the QB coach, OC, and HC results from their inferior perspective of seeing players everyday instead of only Saturdays from your couch.
Dobbs might've found the field earlier by not practicing like the #3 QB, and only being pressed into service by necessity where gameday onlookers then declare the staff negligent. If he'd played like he's been practicing, we'd hear little acclaim. The staff might know a bit more.Also, some players are "gamers" and some mostly only good practice players - that is for coaches to figure out (and based on what everyone saw yesterday our coaches seem to have misjudged how far Dobbs has actually progressed and what he is already capable off).
] The staff might know a bit more.
Isn't questioning staff decisions one of the purposes of these "democratic" forums? Or should no staff decisions ever be questioned?
Anyhow, I'm sold on CBJ so far but still undecided on the rest of the staff (and while they may be ok, I do know one thing that was over-sold for sure - they are NOT the best stuff in America).
Isn't questioning staff decisions one of the purposes of these "democratic" forums? Or should no staff decisions ever be questioned?
Anyhow, I'm sold on CBJ so far but still undecided on the rest of the staff (and while they may be ok, I do know one thing that was over-sold for sure - they are NOT the best stuff in America).
Y If you're sold on him, by extension you must agree with me. :acute: