I was reading a blog from last year and the guy had an interesting observation. UT's defense gave up a lot of points in several losses; 27 to Georgia, 41 to Notre Dame, 28 to Vandy, and 20 to South Carolina.
If UT could have held all of those teams to 14 points, UT could have been 8-3, losing only to Alabama 6-3 and Florida 16-7. And going to overtime against GA instead of losing 27-14.
For the most part last year, Sanders, Fulmer, and the rest of the offense took most of the blame for UT's 5-6 season. Granted the defense spend a huge amount of time on the field, and a lot of points where the result of poor field position, special teams, etc. But maybe the defense wasn't as good as everyone thought it was last year? Maybe it is asking too much to expect the defense to hold Notre Dame and Georgia to 14 points. But what about South Carolina and Vandy?
If UT could have held all of those teams to 14 points, UT could have been 8-3, losing only to Alabama 6-3 and Florida 16-7. And going to overtime against GA instead of losing 27-14.
For the most part last year, Sanders, Fulmer, and the rest of the offense took most of the blame for UT's 5-6 season. Granted the defense spend a huge amount of time on the field, and a lot of points where the result of poor field position, special teams, etc. But maybe the defense wasn't as good as everyone thought it was last year? Maybe it is asking too much to expect the defense to hold Notre Dame and Georgia to 14 points. But what about South Carolina and Vandy?