Check this out

#1

indyvol15

Bleeding orange in Indy!
Joined
May 12, 2005
Messages
545
Likes
0
#1
Blame Fulmer instead of Sanders
Ryan Callahan -
Tuesday, November 01, 2005 issue
Click here to print


Phillip Fulmer stepped back in front of the podium, momentarily taking the spotlight from a misty-eyed Randy Sanders.

It was the least he could do on the day Sanders announced his resignation as offensive coordinator. After all, the offense is partly Fulmer’s responsibility, too.

Scratch that. It’s all his.

With Sanders stepping down Monday after almost seven years on the job, Fulmer took the time to reiterate his role in Tennessee’s offense.

“It starts at the top, and we’re all accountable,” Fulmer said. “We will go from here, and we will do what we have to do to get our football program back to where it’s competing for championships.”

In that case, maybe he should take his own advice and step aside from the offense.

Tennessee fans undoubtedly will be smiling today, more than they ever thought they might with the Vols under .500 seven games into the season.

But don’t celebrate just yet. The much-maligned coordinator might be on his way out — he’ll remain quarterbacks coach for the rest of the season — but the often-in-the-way head coach isn’t going anywhere.

It doesn’t matter who replaces Sanders. The face of the offense will change, but the results will not. At least not as long as the evidence of offensive ineptitude has Fulmer’s fingerprints all over it.

Take, for example, his idea for calling plays the rest of the season.

“We’ll share in that,” Fulmer said. “Randy’s a very vital cog in coaching the quarterbacks and the plan, and has been.”

Of course Sanders has been a vital cog in the offense. As long as his title was offensive coordinator, that was his job.

Apparently, though, it’s Fulmer’s job, too.

Therein lies the problem. Fulmer was offensive coordinator until he took over as head coach at the end of the 1992 season. He’s an offensive-minded coach, so he believes he should to put his own signature on the offense.

Just the same as Steve Spurrier runs South Carolina’s offense all by himself, it’s Fulmer’s right to have whatever input he wants on play-calling, scheming and coaching changes.

There is, however, one big difference.

As you might have noticed Saturday night — or over much of the last decade — Fulmer is no Spurrier. For that matter, Tennessee’s offense isn’t South Carolina’s.

Do you really think Sanders wanted to run all those draw plays on third-and-long? Or the 17,000 variations of screen passes to wide receivers used over the last seven years?

There’s no former quarterback in America (yes, Sanders was a backup here at UT) that wouldn’t love to go five-wide and sling it downfield all day long, just like there’s no former offensive lineman that wouldn’t love to pound an opponent into submission with run play after grinding run play.

That’s why we’ll never know if Sanders might have been a decent offensive coordinator.

And it’s why Tennessee’s offense won’t be the same until Fulmer steps out of his coordinator’s way.


— Ryan Callahan is the sports editor of The Daily Beacon. He can be reached at callahan@utk.edu.

All site content © The University of Tennessee 2005
Website design © Jeremy Tunnell


Thought You all might like to read this....This was on ndnation
 

VN Store



Back
Top