Hmmm, a lot of people on this forum want to call names and argue, but when asked to actually think about something and come up with something that doesn't involve running someone down.....no one participates.
Hmmm, a lot of people on this forum want to call names and argue, but when asked to actually think about something and come up with something that doesn't involve running someone down.....no one participates.
You posted this at 1AM how many responses did you expect?? :crazy:
Also your suggestion about Lieberman is just lol: never gonna happen. He will never get on a GOP ticket. He stands for very little that the Repubs agree with. Besides his support for the war he is Ted Kennedy minus the martini.
I think Lieberman is all but a New England Republican now. He is actually a little more conservative than Rudy on a few issues.
I think now more than any time in recent history the country could elect a split ticket.
I would be interested to know if this little Obama/Hillary 'feud' is actually designed to keep attention on them for a while. For all we know, they've already agreed to their ticket and they are just stirring up the press to keep the attention away from Rudy, Mitt, and McCain. COuld be a stretch but with Hillary anything is possible.
Also your suggestion about Lieberman is just lol: never gonna happen. He will never get on a GOP ticket. He stands for very little that the Repubs agree with. Besides his support for the war he is Ted Kennedy minus the martini.
The next issue of Time magazine, due on Friday, features several takes on the Iraq war and domestic politics.
"Independent" Sen. Joe Liebeman receives a mini-profile titled "What Joe Wants," a key question since he is "the Senate's one-man tipping point." Republicans, the magazine says, are "courting him" and Lieberman "has been indulging in some fairly immodest political footsie."
Lieberman calls jumping to the Republican side, and tilting the Senate, "a remote possibility," which means there's at least a chance of that. Time seems to push Lieberman in this direction, as the article concludes: "Lieberman's GOP flirtation has its risks--and a time limit....The longer he waits to capitalize on his moment, the greater the danger that he'll be tagged as one of those politicians for whom having power is more important than using it."
Oh?
Care to rethink your criticism of my idea?
I never said he would "win over the base". There are very good candidates that won't "Win over the base" of the republican party.
I said there is a chance he could align with McCain. You stated that he is a democrat and would never do it. I provided you with text from an article saying he is considering doing it in the Senate, thus proving that there IS a posibility of it happening. Which makes your criticism of my original thought less powerful.