Circumcisions may be banned in Frisco

#1
Rasputin_Vol

Rasputin_Vol

"Slava Ukraina"
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
72,056
Likes
39,845
#1
#3
#3
A doctor performs an abortion, no problem.

A doctor performs a circumcision, $1000 fine and a year in jail.

Makes perfect sense to me... :unsure:
 
#4
#4
Wow, so Jewish boys are supposed to be circumcised around the 8th day, right? What happens to Jewish parents who have their boys circumcised?

This is totally the choice of the parents. What a joke.
 
#6
#6
VolFan32 said:
Wow, so Jewish boys are supposed to be circumcised around the 8th day, right? What happens to Jewish parents who have their boys circumcised?

This is totally the choice of the parents. What a joke.
Click to expand...
Parents don't have any choice once the child is born.

Liberals are pro-choice only before they are born.
 
Last edited:
#9
#9
JTrainDavis said:
You'd think they'd be encouraged as an anti hiv measure.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

HIV/AIDS Resource Center for Gay Men: Barebacking & HIV Disclosure: What's the Law? - The Body

California's "Willful Exposure" Law

The law makes it a felony punishable by up to eight years of imprisonment for an HIV-positive person to "willfully expose" another person to HIV through unprotected sex.

The law is narrowly drafted, however, so that it only applies to individuals who intend to infect others with HIV through sex. It is designed to prosecute cases like one in New York, where one man infected more than a dozen young women, not to police every sexual encounter engaged in by people living with HIV.

To be prosecuted under the law, you would have to do all of the following:

1. Have anal or vaginal sex. You cannot be prosecuted for oral sex. As to anal and vaginal sex, the law applies equally to men and women; tops and bottoms. The law punishes exposing someone to HIV through these types of sex. Your sexual partner does not have to actually become infected.

2. Know that you are HIV-positive. You cannot be prosecuted for sex that you had before you knew that you were HIV-positive.

3. Fail to disclose your HIV status. If you disclose before insertion, you cannot be prosecuted.

4. Fail to use a condom. Even if you do not disclose, you cannot be prosecuted unless you have "unprotected sex." The law defines "unprotected sex" as failing to use a condom. This means that every inserting penis has to be covered. Even if you are on the receiving end, you have a legal obligation to make sure that your partner wears a condom.

5. Have the "specific intent" to infect the other person. Most likely, this element will prevent the statute from being used to harass people living with HIV. To be prosecuted, you have to engage in the sexual activity with the specific intention of infecting the other person with HIV. Just knowing that you had HIV when you had sex will not be enough. The law explicitly states that: "Evidence that the person had knowledge of his or her HIV-positive status, without additional evidence, shall not be sufficient to prove specific intent."
Because of this specific-intent requirement, the law is narrowed in scope to only cover individuals who want to infect other people, and who are probably expressing that desire. If you slip up one time, it's unlikely that you will be prosecuted. However, the best way to stay clear of this law, and other legal liabilities, is to always disclose your status and/or practice safer sex.
Click to expand...

Not sure if this satisfies you or if you think the US should take the "must wear a condom" approach to gays like Sweden does to all sex?
 
#10
#10
#12
#12
VOLatile said:
Oh, I see. How is circumcision a preventative measure?
Click to expand...

Supposedly it drastically lowers female to male transmission, or catcher to pitcher, you could say.

Saw it on a national geographic show about Africa.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#15
#15
VOLatile said:
1. Have anal or vaginal sex. You cannot be prosecuted for oral sex. As to anal and vaginal sex, the law applies equally to men and women; tops and bottoms. The law punishes exposing someone to HIV through these types of sex. Your sexual partner does not have to actually become infected.
Click to expand...

Why do they make that distinction? :blink:
 
#16
#16
#17
#17
I see a surplus of duck butter in San Fran's future.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#25
#25
Maybe it makes sex feel better leading to more kids being born to help them take over the world.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top