Daughter's Facebook Post cost Daddy $80,000

#1
Rasputin_Vol

Rasputin_Vol

"Slava Ukraina"
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
72,056
Likes
39,845
#1
Daughter's Facebook Brag Costs Her Family $80,000


According to the Miami Herald, Patrick Snay, 69, was the headmaster at Gulliver Preparatory School in Miami for several years, but in 2010, the school didn’t renew his contract. Snay sued his former employer for age discrimination and won a settlement of $80,000 in November 2011. The agreement contained a standard confidentiality clause, prohibiting Snay or the school from talking about the case.

However, Snay’s daughter, Dana, now at Boston College and a part-time Starbucks barista, couldn’t resist bragging about the case on Facebook. “Mama and Papa Snay won the case against Gulliver,” she wrote. “Gulliver is now officially paying for my vacation to Europe this summer. SUCK IT.”
Click to expand...


32783920-a0a3-11e3-8766-efc3a3c3f836_dana-snay-facebook.jpg
 
#6
#6
VOLatile said:
It prohibited her to talk about it, too? Hm... sucks to be them.
Click to expand...

If it prohibited him from talking about it, that means he couldn't tell his daughter. When she posted that blurb on facebook, it proved that he broke the confidentiality agreement.
 
#7
#7
He's got no shot, especially when his excuse was he had to tell his daughter because she has “psychological scars” from her time at the school.

Yeah.....good luck with that horsecrap excuse.
 
#9
#9
Could you even imagine how that conversation went down between her and her parents after that?

Would you even have a conversation with your daughter after that?

What daughter?
 
#14
#14
...does not read like she was part of the agreement. Is over 18 and not bound by anything her parent agree to. It will be interesting to see which way the state supreme court goes. Which opens the door for all kinds of these agreements to confuse judgments for these type of institutional crimines. It would open the door for far to much B>S> down the line in almost any area of judgement.







IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#15
#15
orangeblooded2 said:
...does not read like she was part of the agreement. Is over 18 and not bound by anything her parent agree to. It will be interesting to see which way the state supreme court goes. Which opens the door for all kinds of these agreements to confuse judgments for these type of institutional crimines. It would open the door for far to much B>S> down the line in almost any area of judgement.







IMO.
Click to expand...
She doesn't have to be part of the agreement. Her opening her mouth is proof that the information was leaked from the original party.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#16
#16
9296potsguy said:
She doesn't have to be part of the agreement. Her opening her mouth is proof that the information was leaked from the original party.
Click to expand...

I don't know how you can reasonably expect someone to not tell their family that they'd won the case.

However, a simple sit down conversation with the daughter should have prevented this. "Don't f***ing tell anyone we won that f***ing case or you won't be going to Europe to sleep with those cool European guys you've been swooning after."
 
#17
#17
VOLatile said:
I don't know how you can reasonably expect someone to not tell their family that they'd won the case.

However, a simple sit down conversation with the daughter should have prevented this. "Don't f***ing tell anyone we won that f***ing case or you won't be going to Europe to sleep with those cool European guys you've been swooning after."
Click to expand...

I imagine they don't expect them not to tell the family.

However they probably do reasonably expect that the family doesn't broadcast it on the internet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#18
#18
However, Snay’s daughter, Dana, now at Boston College and a part-time Starbucks barista, couldn’t resist bragging about the case on Facebook. “Mama and Papa Snay won the case against Gulliver,” she wrote. “Gulliver is now officially paying for my vacation to Europe this summer. SUCK IT.”

32783920-a0a3-11e3-8766-efc3a3c3f836_dana-snay-facebook.jpg
Click to expand...



No vacation for you. Suck it!


Gonna have to if you still want to take that trip.
 
#20
#20
I don't see how parents can't discuss a legal case they are in with their dependent when the dependent already knows that litigation is underway.

"Mom, dad, where are you going?"
"I'm not at liberty to divulge that information"
 
#21
#21
VOLatile said:
I don't know how you can reasonably expect someone to not tell their family that they'd won the case.

However, a simple sit down conversation with the daughter should have prevented this. "Don't f***ing tell anyone we won that f***ing case or you won't be going to Europe to sleep with those cool European guys you've been swooning after."
Click to expand...
Exactly, anyone that it could ever be mentioned to, better be trusted not to say a word about it, family members included. It should have been made clear.
 
#22
#22
crusse10 said:
I don't see how parents can't discuss a legal case they are in with their dependent when the dependent already knows that litigation is underway.

"Mom, dad, where are you going?"
"I'm not at liberty to divulge that information"
Click to expand...

just to add.... if she also went to the school, she knew her dad was dismissed and also that there was a lawsuit. Doesn't mean dad told her the amount when it settled. $1 or $100,000, technically if daddy said "case is over, you can go to Europe" Gulliver did pay the bill. How much though she didn't know. Possibly.
 
#23
#23
Got a tongue on her that's for sure and you know what they say about chicks with big tongues........
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top