Defense and time of possession

#1

HooahVol

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2017
Messages
1,807
Likes
4,331
#1
According to the following website: College Football Stats - College FB Team Average Time of Possession (Excluding OT) | TeamRankings.com Tennessee ranked 130 out of 131 in time of possession averaging 24:58 a game. While that is an impressive number from an explosive offense perspective it does mean our defense was on the field a lot. For comparison, Georgia's time of possession is 33:19. Almost 10 more minutes per game for the defense to rest. Do you guys think this is an issues with Heupel's high tempo offense? Is it something we can fix just with depth on the defensive side of the ball?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NcVolfan24
#2
#2
Here we go again.

Its not just the offense. If the D got more stops our time of possession would go up too. Even with the obvious exceptions included our D did not give up a lot of points.

In this case the ToP probably resembles yards per game pretty closely. I wouldnt feel any better about our team if we held the ball for 30 minutes but gave up the same out of points.

Points wins games. I am pretty sure how many points per game we give up vs the opponent ToP is a pretty good ratio.
 
#6
#6
This is something I think is fascinating about Heupels gameplan, our fast pace offense defies the rules of football, we hardly ever have the ball the longest yet we score the most points, I think the defense does get tired to a degree but in most games we played this year the second stringers were playing by the third quarter because we were so far ahead, it may even its self out in some way, also Heupel slows down the tempo when he feels the defense is getting tired.
 
#7
#7
According to the following website: College Football Stats - College FB Team Average Time of Possession (Excluding OT) | TeamRankings.com Tennessee ranked 130 out of 131 in time of possession averaging 24:58 a game. While that is an impressive number from an explosive offense perspective it does mean our defense was on the field a lot. For comparison, Georgia's time of possession is 33:19. Almost 10 more minutes per game for the defense to rest. Do you guys think this is an issues with Heupel's high tempo offense? Is it something we can fix just with depth on the defensive side of the ball?

It is up to the defense to get up off the field. Give up fewer first downs. It is not the fault of a high tempo offense. Just get more 3 and outs. Pretty simple to understand. I can't understand why fans don't comprehend this.
 
#8
#8
Good points.

Just a fun, scary thought. What if our defense does start getting 3 and outs and our offense stays high octane? We will be scoring 70 or 80 points a game!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Southeastern VFL
#10
#10
Good points.

Just a fun, scary thought. What if our defense does start getting 3 and outs and our offense stays high octane? We will be scoring 70 or 80 points a game!
Yep, several more possessions per game = several more tds per game. Plus better field position.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
#13
#13
Here we go again.

Its not just the offense. If the D got more stops our time of possession would go up too. Even with the obvious exceptions included our D did not give up a lot of points.

In this case the ToP probably resembles yards per game pretty closely. I wouldnt feel any better about our team if we held the ball for 30 minutes but gave up the same out of points.

Points wins games. I am pretty sure how many points per game we give up vs the opponent ToP is a pretty good ratio.
This. Get occasional stops on 3rd down and you get to rest. This in turn leads to more possessions and time of possession for the offense. These lack of 3rd down stops don’t just occur late in games. It’s been been consistent throughout the entirety of 4 quarters far too often.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HalfullVol
#14
#14
We also had a 9 minute drive against LSU this year. We can go slow when we want to. Like others have said, defense needs to get off the field on their own.
 
Last edited:
#15
#15
Until the game is changed to award points for each minute you possess the ball, Time of Possession will remain a useless stat.

There was a time (many of us weren't alive then) when time of possession mattered. I mean, truly mattered. Games ended with scores like 7-3 and 10-7. Scoring points was a rarity; you might only get to do it once or twice in the entire match. Because holding the ball longer meant you had a better chance at one of those rare scoring opportunities, the key was to hold the ball. Just find a way to stay on offense. Do that long enough, and you would win. Maybe 3-0, but you could win!

Those days are gone.

Stop worrying about time of possession as a stat. Today, the game is all about scoring regularly and "breaking serve."

Now as a concept, ToP is worth being aware of, if only because yes, we have to recruit and develop defenders who can play 35-40 minutes a game. And still be effective on the final play.

That's all ToP tells us. That's all it will ever tell us. Having it, or giving it up, has zero other effect on the game. You can safely ignore it, because our coaches are on the case.

Go Vols!
 
#16
#16
Here we go again.

Its not just the offense. If the D got more stops our time of possession would go up too. Even with the obvious exceptions included our D did not give up a lot of points.

In this case the ToP probably resembles yards per game pretty closely. I wouldnt feel any better about our team if we held the ball for 30 minutes but gave up the same out of points.

Points wins games. I am pretty sure how many points per game we give up vs the opponent ToP is a pretty good ratio.
Exactly! Get some 3rd/4th down stops and get the hell off the field.
 
#17
#17
That is why I don't mind all the fake injuries to slow our offense down. It gives our D more time to rest.
 
#18
#18
According to the following website: College Football Stats - College FB Team Average Time of Possession (Excluding OT) | TeamRankings.com Tennessee ranked 130 out of 131 in time of possession averaging 24:58 a game. While that is an impressive number from an explosive offense perspective it does mean our defense was on the field a lot. For comparison, Georgia's time of possession is 33:19. Almost 10 more minutes per game for the defense to rest. Do you guys think this is an issues with Heupel's high tempo offense? Is it something we can fix just with depth on the defensive side of the ball?
If Georgia could score TDs in 2 minutes, I am sure they would. One would like to be able to score on every offensive play if possible. If defenses can quickly get the other guy's offense off the field, time of possession means nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HalfullVol
#19
#19
Like Rodney Garner said, you want to rest get off the field on 3rd down!!! Our offense has nothing with the defense being terrible!
 
  • Like
Reactions: HalfullVol
#21
#21
According to the following website: College Football Stats - College FB Team Average Time of Possession (Excluding OT) | TeamRankings.com Tennessee ranked 130 out of 131 in time of possession averaging 24:58 a game. While that is an impressive number from an explosive offense perspective it does mean our defense was on the field a lot. For comparison, Georgia's time of possession is 33:19. Almost 10 more minutes per game for the defense to rest. Do you guys think this is an issues with Heupel's high tempo offense? Is it something we can fix just with depth on the defensive side of the ball?

If our defense was as good as Georgia's, we would've averaged 70 a game and our ToP would've mattered even less than it did this year.

ToP doesn't matter if our defense is getting stops and our offense is scoring. Only one of those two things happened this year and we still almost made the playoffs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VOLINVONORE
#23
#23
Until the game is changed to award points for each minute you possess the ball, Time of Possession will remain a useless stat.

There was a time (many of us weren't alive then) when time of possession mattered. I mean, truly mattered. Games ended with scores like 7-3 and 10-7. Scoring points was a rarity; you might only get to do it once or twice in the entire match. Because holding the ball longer meant you had a better chance at one of those rare scoring opportunities, the key was to hold the ball. Just find a way to stay on offense. Do that long enough, and you would win. Maybe 3-0, but you could win!

Those days are gone.

Stop worrying about time of possession as a stat. Today, the game is all about scoring regularly and "breaking serve."

Now as a concept, ToP is worth being aware of, if only because yes, we have to recruit and develop defenders who can play 35-40 minutes a game. And still be effective on the final play.

That's all ToP tells us. That's all it will ever tell us. Having it, or giving it up, has zero other effect on the game. You can safely ignore it, because our coaches are on the case.

Go Vols!
I'd call an "overrated" stat more than a useless one. If a team can control the ball AND score points it's pretty devastating, especially late in a game. Shortening the game is a good plan if you take advantage of your offensive opportunities.
 
#25
#25
I'd call an "overrated" stat more than a useless one. If a team can control the ball AND score points it's pretty devastating, especially late in a game. Shortening the game is a good plan if you take advantage of your offensive opportunities.
Tennessee had the ball for less than 14 minutes and scored 45 points against Kentucky in 2021. Meanwhile, Kentucky had it for 46 minutes and scored 42 points. TOP is useless.
 

VN Store



Back
Top